Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
    • totally immaterial. time to now start reading up. Programmable Search Engine (google.com) Clickme^^^ do not miss your defence filing date no matter what dx  
    • Programmable Search Engine CSE.GOOGLE.COM clickme^^
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

chipsandsausages v halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys.

 

There was a letter in your library until recently, which seemed to quote the law and used past examples of litigation when you write to your bank asking for your money back.

 

I can't find it now. I sent my preliminary letter requesting repayment, which stated ...." I will write to you again, giving you a further 14 days to reflect....." Am I right in thinking that this 2nd letter is, more or less, worded the same - pointing out that their charges are unlawful etc. and that they have 14 days to give a 'positive' response?

 

Just checking really, as I didn't want to send the same letter twice.

 

Thanks for all your help. You guys are great - I will definitely nominate y'all for some kind of award - perhaps a little MBE....?

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

That seems correct - i.e. that there is only one letter to send.

 

If you have your statements, then go to - "Letter - Preliminary approach for repayment."

 

otherwise you would need to request via DPA - "Data Protection Act Request -- Letter - List of charges"

 

Once you have the standard response from the bank, you use the - "Letter before action"

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got my statements about 10 days ago, after going through them I wrote telling them "the charges that have been levied are unlawful etc... please refund all monies within 14 days. If not, I will write again giving you a further 14 days to reflect before court action blah blah......"

 

It was just that the prelim letter and the LBA were both worded very similarly.

 

I remember reading another letter that isn't in the library any more, it tells of 2 previous claims that have been successful and also quotes the fact that the charges are brought by estimating the number of customers who will exceed their OD limits etc, and is there to cover the banks costs re: loan defaulters etc. Do you know the one I mean?

 

Just thought that might be better to use as my LBA.

 

Thanks for any help you can offer!!! x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just stick with the LBA currently in the library - if there was another then it will have been removed/ amalgamated with good reason, probably to avoid this confusion....

 

You only need to point out that they have 14 days or court action will follow.

 

To quote BankFodder... "This letter warns your bank that they owe you money and that you will be suing them unless they pay.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only speak personally on that one - and it's because I didn't know the law!!

 

You tend to expect that when a bank tells you it can do something, then it can. Until now.....

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know how I am progressing.

 

March 27th prelim letter req repayment sent for 1471.25.

March 30th - letter rec'd advising they paid 14.99 debit card which caused me to exceed OD by £6 for 2 days. Further £30 please.

 

April 6th 2 letters received. One said, we have paid the amount below even though it meant you exceeded your OD limit. We will have another £30 thankyou. The other said 'Sorry you are not happy with the service we provide - we will get back to you. Meanwhile, here's a leaflet.' Followed by a computer generated signature.

 

???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, my child benefit was paid in today, plus another £60 I managed to scrape together, which will all go into the Halifax's pot - as my total charges up to now for April will be £157. My letter before action is printed and ready to post today. I have also told them that charges I am expecting over the next couple of weeks will be included in my claim. Am I okay to do that if they haven't actually taken the money yet, but have written to say they will take it in seven days time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same problem, in that I knew an additional charge would be taken later in the month. I mentioned it in my letter, but when I issued claim, I had to go with what was the actual amount taken at that point.

 

I just see it that when I get the 1st lot back, if they contact me 1st to offer settlement, I will ask that they include the latest charges, or I will immediately start a 2nd round of letters, and hopefully, this time, they'll relaise I mean business and settle before it goes to Moneyclaim. Either way, they will pay me every penny. With interest, if that's the way they want to do it.

 

Why aren't you diverting your CB into a different bank account? That will stop them getting their grubby paws on it before you do, and any charges they heap on your account, well, they can always add to your overdraft, and you reclaim later. Meanwhile, you might use the CB for what it's actually meant to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bookworm, never actually thought of that. Although I need every penny I can get at the moment to go into the halifax a/c to avoid exceeding my overdraft.... it's like a vicious circle.

 

I would divert my CB, but that combined with my wages, pays for my bills and if I diverted it now, it would mean diverting all my direct debits too. I want to try to do all this together so I will take your advice on board and start the ball rolling as soon as I get a full day to myself to sort it all out. (PROMISE!)

 

I visited my bank today to hand in my LBA. I am actually excited about the whole thing. Not scared of going to court at all in fact. Bring it on! So they have till April 25th to respond. Will let you know how I get on. Thing is, with opening another account elsewhere - aren't all banks the same???? Is there such a thing as a bank that actually takes care of your money? or would that be asking too much...?!

 

 

Actually worked out in my head - that it's been costing me a little over £60 a month to have my account with the halifax - for the last 2 years - when most of my charges were racked up!

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I got a letter today (I only handed my LBA into my branch 2 days ago!!) - it said that they had tried to contact me but I was not available to take the call. I will ask them when this was, because there have been NO calls made - all calls received are checked!:o

 

They have offered (as a goodwill gesture) £380 if I accept as full and final settlement. Of course, the amount is not negotiable and I will be advising them in due course.:D

 

How much "goodwill" can a bank afford to spread amongst it's customers??

 

Date for moneyclaim remains April 25th.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well guys, it's 3 days before I am due to go to moneyclaim - and guess what?

 

"I am sorry to learn that you are unhappy with our initial offer to refund £380 worth of charges......in an attempt to reach an amicable solution to your complaint, I am prepared to increase my offer to £777...."

 

How do they come to that amount?

 

777?

 

Well - I guess it's the courts for me. A little scared it may come back on me, but hey - I am prepared to go the full journey.

 

Let's gerrem!

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it took blood, sweat and tears but it's done now.

 

Have been to moneyclaim and put my case forward. I hope it is the right thing. Keep thinking about what it would be like sitting at the table with the guy from the Halifax and all his legal papers - and me with my pink and blue ring binders....

 

Hope it doesn't get that far anyway. But if it does I shall be well prepared. (Thanks to everyone on this site).

 

 

The girls I work with can't believe I have gone through with it! Some of them have asked for the website address so that they too can have the chance to reclaim what is theirs.

 

I wrote to the Halifax today to tell them I would accept the £777 but would continue to claim the rest through the courts.

 

They bounced my council tax again today (twice in one month) so they have now charged me £78 for not paying my council tax in April. (?) This means I don't have the money to pay it because my charges for April have exceeded £200. I have said in my letter to them that they have caused me financial hardship - I am a mother of 2 children who need to be clothed and fed - in the hope that they will cancel the charges about to be brought next week. Failure to do this would result in me issuing another claim on them - and more court costs.

 

I'll let you know if I hear anything.

 

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey C&S

 

Good for you for sticking by your guns!

 

I wish you all the best, and hope you get the reply you want very soon, which, I'm sure you will.

 

Haven't done mine yet, skint at the minute... but I'll definitley be doing it this week.

 

Again, good luck... and let me know how you get on.

 

All the best

 

KC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the courts have sent my confirmation letter - I am to "deem it as 'served'" on May 1st which give HFX till May 15th to 'acknowledge'. This buys them another 28 days to put a defence in.

 

Should be paid out by June 12th at the latest me thinks.

 

If it goes to court, hey - what the hell. I'm ready for it.

 

I'll just wait for HFX to write and inform me that they fully intend to defend in court..... tee hee....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi chipsandsausages

 

My claim is running at exactly the same time, deemed to be served on 1st May and 15th May to reply, so i shall keep an eye on your thread.

 

With regard to the 28 days, as i read it, it is only from the date of service which would be 1st may.

I think it only means the 14 days to reply is so they dont default but not to give them another 28 days,28 days is the total.

 

I hope this is correct, in which case we will know what the outcome will be by 29th May.

 

Best of luck to you.

DPA Letter sent 28 Feb

  • Statements Received 24 Mar
  • Prelim sent 24 Mar
  • LBA sent 12 Apr
  • MCOL 26 Apr
  • Acknowledged 3 May
  • Coming soon:

£2810 inc int. Halifax. Done and Dusted 16/05/06

Dont forget to donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont have to wait much longer, my claim went in 12th april.served on the 18th aknowleged on 20th, paid in full yesterday 28th, watch for the posstie.

 

How excited am I right now?

 

Thanks for both of your posts - Brecken, yours really made me smile. So hopefully, I will be able to pay my Council tax in June!!!

 

My parachute is open and ready to collect my salary at the end of May - all Direct Debits accounted for.

 

thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...