Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Co-op Bank and FOS


paulgmb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4697 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I wonder if anyone can advise?

I have an old current account with the Co-op which I opened in the 1980's.

I did use the account but not for my main banking as the store which had a bank counter in it was closed down so the nearest branch was 16 miles away.

There was no internet banking then so having a local branch was essential.

I last used the account around 1992.

 

The account still has a small balance and I have decided that I now want to use it again, as my main bank.

 

I wrote to the Co-op who said they could not trace it.

I then found my old bank card (Electron) which I sent to them proving I did.

They have repeatedly said they cannot trace any account without the account number.

 

I complained to the FOS who have told me verbally that they accept that Co-op have done everything in their power to find the account.

Really?! They have had every address I have ever lived at, DOB and know which branch my account was held at.

 

I have chased up the bank regarding the card as all they said was that the data on it was too old.

I aksed then about the printed number on the back (it didn't have the indented numbers as cards have today) and they said the 'BIN (now?)related to an account number at the Commonwealth Bank' and the card had been destroyed.

 

I now have a form from the FOS asking if I accept their decision with a tick box option.

They have not put in writing what they told me on the phone.

 

Sorry if this is a bit long winded, but this is the short version.

I thought banks had a duty to trace dormant accounts.

Some people I know have found relatives accounts over 50 years old by just writing with a name and address.

I'm still very much alive and the account was last used less than 20 years ago!!

Thanks for any advise you can offer.

Paul. :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

the first advice I can give you, is to be wary of the ombudsman. We have lots of stories of them wanting to do things on the phone and then the writing doesn't reflect what has been discussed. You haven't actually said what the difference was between the FOS verbal statements and their written statements.

The second piece of advice I can give you is that you shouldn't get into any of these conversations without recording calls. You should always always record your calls.

The third piece of advice I can give you is to consider what your plan is. If you don't accept what the Co-op is saying, and if the FOS is trying to find in their favour, if you don't accept the decision then what you propose to do? Mind you, if you disagree with the FOS decision then you're under no obligation to accept it. The FOS are anxious to be able to mark your file "closed" so that they can get it out of the way. Do not really think that the ombudsman is very much concerned with giving a good customer service experience to the people they deal with. They are under resourced, overstretched, not really independent of the banking industry, mocked by the banking industry and they lack the bottle to really meet the industry head on.

The ombudsman service should be scrapped and replaced with a public sector regulator/system of scrutiny to which you can complain. However, for all their grand talk, the government is scared of the banks and things are unlikely to improve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he

iremember the days of the handy bank too

 

they closed them all down

and yep mine was 24mls away

still use it to this day.

 

i thibk i remember reading somewhere that A/C's with less than £25

they close them and they go to a redundant A/C store somewhere.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this. I have previous experience of the FOS, good and very bad! 2 seperate cases.

I fully intend to reply asking for a copy of their recommendation and ticking the box to say I don't accept their decision. What I'm really after is, is there anything specifically I can say in relation to their duty to find dormant accounts?

I thought I had read a few years ago that there were now guidelines/code of practice to assist relatives in tracing lost accounts and some sort of tracing service? I thought there was certainly a stronger obligation on them to investigate properly. I just get the distinct impression that they just can't be bothered to look as they have every detail about me except an 8 digit account number. The annoying thing is, I'm certain I didn't throw out my old cheque book. If only I could find it!

I certainly don't want my money to be seized for Dave Cameron's 'Big Society.' I believe this is the plan for dormant accounts and is it any coincidence that Co-op Bank are going to run it?:shock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...