Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Received reply from first letter


MALCOLMGILL
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6591 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Which letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from Daily Post Friday March 24,2006

Sex Outed

An ESTIMATED 2m people have lost their sex drive as a result of worrying about money,a survey showed yesterday.One in five people who said financial problems had affected their relationship said the issue had hit their sex life..

According to insurance giant AXA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received reply from first letter sent.

Dear Sir

Blah Blah Blah Blah The Bank does not agree with my contention that the charges are unlawful Blah Blah Personal Banking Terms and conditions clause 7.11 in section 2 Blah Blah are clearly stated in published price list blah blah refer to Financial Ombudsman Service this represent our final response on this matter.

Not even a real signature?

Hey did anyone see the article on page 2 in today’s Daily Mail

 

Quote:

The OFT has concluded that the charges are unfair under the Consumer Contract Regulations 1999 coupled with case law dating back to 1914.

Quote:

Clare Whyley, of the National Consumer Council describe the current charges as 'completely unreasonable' She said 'They are a penalty and a punishment rather than a true reflection of the Banks costs.'

Quote:

Consumer group Which? said:'The reality is that these Bank charges are illegal and unenforceable.'

 

 

 

Preparing to send letter before claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I didn't see it. Any chance of a scan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll scan it to you once I get my scanner working, although James has typed it in here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=3235

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont know if this will help anyone my letter before claim will deliver to branch tomorrow.

 

[your address]

 

 

 

[their address]

 

 

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx

Thank you for eventually sending me your standard response letter I note that even the signature is not real!

I now realise that no one has even looked at my statements which also have charges that were taken even though I was in credit, are these lawful as well? Although you might not agree with my contention on this matter I must draw your attention to the article in the daily mail on Sat 1st April which states.

The OFT has concluded that the charges are unfair under the Consumer Contract Regulations 1999 coupled with case law dating back to 1914 these state that charges must be proportionate rather than used as a penalty to punish delinquent customers or a ruse to boost profits.

It will announce a final verdict on Wednesday 5th April with a view to forcing the Banks to slash fees through the courts.

Also I did not receive any terms and conditions when I opened this account.

Therefore there is a doubt that you are in fact correct in your findings.

I wish to clarify this situation through the small claims court procedure and look forward to your defence on this matter.

I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £XXXXX plus £XXX which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken. Total £XXXXX

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

I am unsure whether I wish to remain with a Bank that levies unlawful charges, and would hope that as a long standing customer that you refund these unlawful charges immediately.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I didn't see it. Any chance of a scan?

I scanned it to Bookworm yesterday...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t Panic! The only way I can see that you will get you money back from the Banks is by pursuing it, follow the step by step guide in Library issue court proceedings if necessary their not going to just give it to you?

They have no defence now after today’s OFT ruling their not just back pedalling they have fallen off!

I Hear and I forget, I see and I Remember, I do and I understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received reply from letter before action.

Blah Blah our last letter constituted our final response with regards this matter

(Ok why have you sent me this one?) So strait to money claim then or give them full 14 days? It’s looking to me that the Banks will probably see who will actually go to court and then pay up. Did you know that no letters are opened at the Branch unless they are addressed to a specific person or the Bank Manager by name other wise they are collected and opened at another place. I am opening another account tomorrow but is it with a Bank that has unlawful charges?

Tip) for new members,

Register your names go straight to FAQ and print off,

Go to step by step guide and print off,

You now have hard copy to look at as many times as you like with out having to search site for info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have issued court claim today online have open parachute with another Bank that has unlawful charges! couldnt do spread sheet so have just gone for charges.

Had trouble with Moneyclaim site accepting ammount?

Particulars of claim hmm!

Still lets see what happens best £30 quid ive spent yet and used there card as well to pay! will come up on statement as Moneyclaim tee! hee!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea - I didn't even realise that it had been.

 

Perhaps you could email him and let us know the answer?

 

I hope that he doesn't think that we've trod on his toes with the Consumer part of the site.

 

That wasn't our intention at all - we are all about the legalities of what big firms do to people, not about finding the cheapest way to do something and saving money.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have received Notice of Issue am now waiting for response from HSBC.

When I sent Preliminary letter I also looked through my credit cards one totted up to £120 in charges one came to £50. I had paid this online 5 days before it was due as required, the payment was taken immediately from my Bank account HSBC in their wisdom didn’t process until the following day ?result £25 slap on wrist !

Rang up credit card Company complained! Unlawful charges told this was their policy so!!!!! Boshed off two letters to them at the same time, received standard reply, Boshed off 2 Letter before action Received standard reply?

Yesterday received 2 letters will pay full refund £120 and £30 back for other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good stuff.......

 

Keep us updated with events

 

John

  • Confused 1

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have received Acknowledgment of service of claim from DG Solicitors signed Deborah D’Aubney. They have indicated that they intend to defend all of this claim.

Question why is it being heard in Northampton County Court and not in my local Court? Letters were sent to Branch and Mr Pretty in Leeds I live in the Northwest can I have this County Court changed? I shall ring up and find out.

I have realised how important this site is there are many people anxious over taking there Bank to court and are looking for many answers to questions I agree sometimes people are lazy or don’t have time to post comments or successes, but hey make time any information will certainly help someone? If you have gone through the process and was successful don’t just send a book token give help and encouragement to others on this site.

I never thought that I would see the day when I would be taking my Bank to Court even if I lose I am glad that I caused them some stress they have robbed me blind for years. I remember going 68p overdrawn once and received a letter which they charged me £12 telling me I was 68p overdrawn! this was in the early 80s when I was unemployed and living on £13 a week yes £13 a week with 2 kids, its been going on for years think of the money they have taken in that time but now the worm is turning and is going to bite them on the a*** Rant over……………

Link to post
Share on other sites

It automatically goes to Northampton County Court when you file with Moneyclaim because that is the court that handles the online claims.

 

If it gets as far as an actual court appearance then the case will be transfered to your local court (because your case is against a company - if it was against an individual then it would be their local court).

Claiming: £1312.50

Prelim Sent: 12 April 2006

Response Received: 21 April 2006

LBA Sent :24 April 2006

Second Response: 26 April 2006

Claim Filed : 28 April 2006

Claim Acknowledged: 2 May 2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received letter from DG Solicitors with dodgy signature and no name of who actually sent it. HSBC are entirely confident charges are reasonable blah blah however mindful of management time blah blah small claims regime, commercial reason, blah blah no liability blah prepared to make payment of xxxxx blah blah ex gratia payment strictly confidential and want me to sign it don’t know whether I can agree to this what do you think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received letter from DG Solicitors with dodgy signature and no name of who actually sent it. HSBC are entirely confident charges are reasonable blah blah however mindful of management time blah blah small claims regime, commercial reason, blah blah no liability blah prepared to make payment of xxxxx blah blah ex gratia payment strictly confidential and want me to sign it don’t know whether I can agree to this what do you think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received letter from DG Solicitors with dodgy signature and no name of who actually sent it. HSBC are entirely confident charges are reasonable blah blah however mindful of management time blah blah small claims regime, commercial reason, blah blah no liability blah prepared to make payment of xxxxx blah blah ex gratia payment strictly confidential and want me to sign it don’t know whether I can agree to this what do you think ?
This is really your own call. If they are offering you the full amount, are you prepared not to discuss that with anyone? I'm not sure that I would be able to agree to full confidentiality, but then I've not had such an offer as yet. Maybe that will come later? The ideal would be to write back, thanking them for the money which I'm happy with but can't accept any confidentiality agreement. Others here can probably give you a template for such a reply.

 

Neil.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone seen the claim form and response pack that the Banks receive? I have, the claimant receive a single paper Notice of Issue after the court claim is filed, there claim form is the one they sign saying that they intend to defend all of this claim also on this form

Under:

Please read these notes carefully it says

Registration of Judgement: If this claim results in a judgement against you, details will be entered in a public register, the Register of County Court Judgements. They will then be passed to credit reference agencies which will supply them to credit grantors and others seeking information on your financial standing. This will make it difficult for you to get credit. A list of credit reference agencies is available from Registry Trust Ltd. London.

This would be a bit embarrassing for them.

I can’t see any Bank defending in court unless they were 110% sure that they would win……it’s a bluff

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6591 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...