Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Underground prosecution Threat


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4779 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been caught using my causin's disabled freedom pass on tube, i told the checker all details correctly even that the pass belongs to my causin, she told me that i will receive a letter and will get prosecuted, its been 8 hours to that incident and i am so much depressed since then, i am an mba student and doing my last semester and in october i am supposed to apply for my psw( post study work) visa i am afraid that any criminal record will effect my application for that visa, could somebody help me sorting this out plz i have never been to such situation and don't have any criminal record before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey ho

 

no big deal

 

just send the grovelling letter when they send you one

 

have a read of a few threads here

 

i hope there is not a series of you using this card else it could get sticky

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to disagree with DX. This is a bigger deal than just avoiding a fare. Freedom passes are publicly funded, and Tfl are likely to take a pretty dim view of it. It may well be prosecuted as a criminal offence.

 

DX is right to say 'send a grovelling letter', you may be lucky and get an administrative settlement. It is worth trying.

 

As to whether one 'fare bunking conviction' will damage your visa application, hard to say. It doesn't help, but the daily Mail will tell us all about people allowed to stay in Britain with convictions for much more serious offences. I suspect that it would not stop a visa being granted, as long as there are no other issues. I have no expertise with visa and immigration issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, this is a fare evasion matter and misuse of publicly funded Freedom Passes is recognised as a very serious abuse of trust by the TfL Prosecutions team.

 

As Wriggler7 advised, wait for the verification letter and write a grovelling apology, offering to pay all the administration costs and fares involved.

 

There's no guarantee it will avoid a Court hearing, but it might.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

(sch i was trying to calm the patient down) ...three in one night is rare on the ticket/jail dream on the night shift...dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is there any other way to get out of this other then suicide?:(

 

Yes, let's not get too melodramatic. You could start by telling the guys the details that have been mentioned, like whether you've done this before [and it can be checked] and if you've had other problems with the train company/ies.

 

I don't mean to be harsh, but you're obviously an intelligent person if you're doing an MBA. Have you read the terms on the back of said pass? I imagine it says something like 'not transferable'.

 

As an aside, I haven't quite grasped why we see people here nearly every week who desperately want to stay in the UK, but don't feel that following our rules is important until they get into trouble. If I wanted a visa to stay somewhere, I'd be staying squeaky-clean. Maybe I'm missing something.

 

Going back to your question, if you tell the guys everything, they'll try to help you. But no-one incuding you can speed up the arrival of the letter and you may have to be patient. Sorry.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long is a piece of string? The famous 'letter' will arrive when it does. If you think it through, the Inspector has a few enquiries to make, check the Oyster history, and then write his report. He may not have done that yet, but he will in a couple of days or so.

 

He then will give it to some sort of 'boss' to read. If everything is 'ok', that boss will send it by internal post to their prosecution team, who undoubtedly have some sort of backlog, they are all busy people.

 

Of course, it could be that the report was written before close of play yesterday, it may be that the 'boss' was at his desk and said 'can I see that', and then was going to the prosecution office, and chose to take it with him.

 

I suggest that you will be written to 'within 6 weeks'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And suicide is not a good option!

 

The prosecutor I chat with most often would serve a summons in hell itself if he thought the case was solid!

 

You do need to keep a sense of perspective. Avoiding rail fares, even if it involves a wrongful use of a discretionery pass, is not the most serious matter to trouble a Magistrates Court.

 

A few weeks ago, I was in Barking Magistrates listening to the sad tale of a woman from Cote d'Ivoire who, despite being unable to understand English (she had a French Interpreter present) had allegedly worked out methods of cheating housing benefits. (Incidentally, the intrpreter spoke lovely, Parisian, French. I could understand her, the defendant was struggling a bit)

 

Not sure how the case will pan out, it is not over yet, but no one is suggesting sending her 'home'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...