Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it a voluntary arrangement, you cant simply stop paying and IGNORE everyone. block and bounce all their email addresses. do not reply! there nothing really legal they can do at all. sorry but you've been had blind from day one. its a real shame you didnt come here when the debts started going legal, you wouldn't have CCJ's at all as i bet all your debts are Credit cards loans etc - all simple consumer credit. and i bet you've not had any bailiffs but powerless DCA claiming to be a bailiff (as they do!) . a bailiff is sent by a court not a DCA. incidentally, even if they were court sent bailiffs,  there not right of forced entry on CCJ debts anyway.... see if you meet the DRO criteria if not just ignore them and stop paying. you can deal with your creditors directly with help from us not thru a IVA.
    • No need to post photos and no need to add names of people you have had dealings with. Just provide a short summary of what problem you are facing and a chronological list of what has happened until now. 
    • If that is the first final notice you have received you can probably expect two or thee more to follow. This to test your resolve. They are hoping that these frightening 😃 letters will scare you into paying. After the third or fourth final demand they then have to decide  whether to actually proceed with a court claim or forget about you for a while. You were not the driver, their PCN is non compliant .No biggy.Slam dunk win for you.
    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Threat of Reposession from First Plus Solicitors **SUSPENDED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4871 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

First off,congratulations and well done! thats the serious bit over with.Now as far as Tesco,s go pay them what you can and by that i dont mean every spare penny you have,they are going to kick up a fuss but we knew that anyway,pay them what you can,"every little helps" its not secured so to be honest theres not a great deal they can do and the main thing is you wont loose your home.Secondly you wont need to check with the courts now because you have a suspended repo order,you would only check if say you came to an agreement before the case went to court.In a few days you will recieve a copy of the order from the court just keep that together with all your other paperwork.F.P,s reps will also have a copy of the judgement so you wont need to do anything,just sit back and enjoy the rest of christmas and the new year,good luck worried6 and once again well done!

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off,congratulations and well done! thats the serious bit over with.Now as far as Tesco,s go pay them what you can and by that i dont mean every spare penny you have,they are going to kick up a fuss but we knew that anyway,pay them what you can,"every little helps" its not secured so to be honest theres not a great deal they can do and the main thing is you wont loose your home.Secondly you wont need to check with the courts now because you have a suspended repo order,you would only check if say you came to an agreement before the case went to court.In a few days you will recieve a copy of the order from the court just keep that together with all your other paperwork.F.P,s reps will also have a copy of the judgement so you wont need to do anything,just sit back and enjoy the rest of christmas and the new year,good luck worried6 and once again well done!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi good to hear from you.

I can hardly believe that this court business is over with. I keep lapsing back into worry mode and then have to pinch myself to remind that it has been sorted out. You really don't realise just how this overtakes every waking moment.

The Housing Rights Counsellor helped me prepare the I&E Statement Tescos wanted and this has been sent off. The next DD to Tescos is due about the 1st Jan so I will let that go. If they don't agree to my proposal I will just cancel the DD and send what I can for the next few months.

Thanks again for your help. You hit the nail on the head the court wanted to see that the priority debt was being attended to first and that negotiations were under way to re-structure payments to unsecured debts. The first hearing was adjourned to give me more time to do that. In fact the FP Solicitor as good as said to me that they felt the adjournment was aimed at them as well to encourage agreement before being heard again.

The Judge was not interested in what was being paid to unsecured debt only that I was following advice given.

Tescos were very unhelpful and it remains to be seen whether they will agree to the reduction I am looking for but the Judge was satisfied that this was how things should be done. As soon as she saw evidence of this and my improved offer she made the suspended order without another word. In fact it was done so quickly I had to take a moment to work out what had actually happened!

Phew!

 

W6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi good to hear from you.

I can hardly believe that this court business is over with. I keep lapsing back into worry mode and then have to pinch myself to remind that it has been sorted out. You really don't realise just how this overtakes every waking moment.

The Housing Rights Counsellor helped me prepare the I&E Statement Tescos wanted and this has been sent off. The next DD to Tescos is due about the 1st Jan so I will let that go. If they don't agree to my proposal I will just cancel the DD and send what I can for the next few months.

Thanks again for your help. You hit the nail on the head the court wanted to see that the priority debt was being attended to first and that negotiations were under way to re-structure payments to unsecured debts. The first hearing was adjourned to give me more time to do that. In fact the FP Solicitor as good as said to me that they felt the adjournment was aimed at them as well to encourage agreement before being heard again.

The Judge was not interested in what was being paid to unsecured debt only that I was following advice given.

Tescos were very unhelpful and it remains to be seen whether they will agree to the reduction I am looking for but the Judge was satisfied that this was how things should be done. As soon as she saw evidence of this and my improved offer she made the suspended order without another word. In fact it was done so quickly I had to take a moment to work out what had actually happened!

Phew!

 

W6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, glad your hearing went in your favour - I told you it would be OK :) judges don't want to take away people's homes if they are able to make payments towards the arrears. I hope you can now relax over the New Year.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, glad your hearing went in your favour - I told you it would be OK :) judges don't want to take away people's homes if they are able to make payments towards the arrears. I hope you can now relax over the New Year.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn

 

I'm glad you had time to come through.

Yes you were right and I am so glad you were.

Thanks to you for the hard work in preparing the Defense Statement and the advice and moral support along the way.

 

Cheers

(Not So) Worried6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn

 

I'm glad you had time to come through.

Yes you were right and I am so glad you were.

Thanks to you for the hard work in preparing the Defense Statement and the advice and moral support along the way.

 

Cheers

(Not So) Worried6

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...