Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFO Services/Barclaycard & Unenforceable Credit Agreements


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4809 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

First time poster so I hope I'm in the right place. HFO services are harassing me at the moment. I have taken all the excellent advice relating to them and requests for information. The agreement was taken out in 1990.

 

Does anyone know if this is likely to be enforceable as I have read that many pre-2007 agreements are not enforceable?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

First time poster so I hope I'm in the right place. HFO services are harassing me at the moment. I have taken all the excellent advice relating to them and requests for information. The agreement was taken out in 1990.

 

Does anyone know if this is likely to be enforceable as I have read that many pre-2007 agreements are not enforceable?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Hi and welcome to CAG,

 

I'm afraid things have moved on since recent test cases have allowed creditors to reconstruct old agreements that were badly stored/microfiched and convince judges that if the money has been lent it should be paid back. The judiciary is certainly looking to enforce anything that will show you have had use of the money and are seeking to get out of your debt. Carey vs HSBC and McGuffick vs HBOS should be looked at for details of what the current situation is imho.

 

That said the water is made murky by the sale of debts to third parties such as HFO and depending on how they purchased it/when it was purchased and who purchased it with this company especiailly it could be vital to any future court action they may take... and do be aware HFO DO take court action if their investigations show you have assets or the potential to pay.

 

Do you know: Who EXACTLY (name of company/address/company registration) the account was sold to? contact Barclaycard to find out.

Do you know: The last payment made on the account? contact Barclaycard to find out.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Barclaycard debt sold to HFO Capital Limited' advised on HFO Services letterhead in 2007.

 

Barclays cannot tell me to whom and when the 'debt' was sold, however, last payment is confirmed as Jan. 2005, default issued August 2006, so would this be SB now?

 

I have my own thread on this, so not hijacking this one, but just a quick visit so not got time to find own thread, apologies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even with Barclaycard’s T&Cs, I reckon end of April at the worst for SB.

 

What’s that about the letter in 2007?

HS can you post up the letter on your HFO thread.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid things have moved on since recent test cases have allowed creditors to reconstruct old agreements that were badly stored/microfiched and convince judges that if the money has been lent it should be paid back

 

s.65 and s.127 (3) still apply of course.

 

Barclays cannot tell me to whom and when the 'debt' was sold, however, last payment is confirmed as Jan. 2005, default issued August 2006, so would this be SB now?

 

So long as you have not acknowledged the debt in writing during the limitation period this debt should be SB.

 

I can't find your thread anyway HS, must be something wrong with the system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...