Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

letter says - HFO got a CCJ against me - real?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Did they actually attach a judgement or give you a claim number? not sure about sending that letter just yet, but if you have sent it never mind. You need to ask TR for the Claim number and judgement. Northampton cannot actually tell you anything, you have to look at Trust Online or Experian (gawd help us) or get the info from the claimants solicitor, Northampton will tell you ithe details if you have the claim number

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

 

Looking at the stattement, I do have a CCJ from 13/06/2008 for £12191. On my statement on the 12th my balance was £12191.93 so I think that is sufficient to confirm they did get a genuine CCJ, up until now unpaid which obviously puts things in a totally different light. Waiting three years to talk about enforcing it or making any contact whatsoever about it still seems somewhat bizarre though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Evening Mould

 

Very Glad to see you on board and back in the fight, appreciated

 

Good evening Coledog

 

Thank you, yes, the fight goes on and on, for good people that is, the bad people? Well, the bad people out-number the good, so we cannot possibly give up.

 

Tingy, sorry about the mini highjack.

 

Kind regards

 

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one attached to the letter today. As far as I know that is all I have, though I'm one of the idiots who buried my head in the sand for a while, so may have got something a while back. Certainly no annual statement - this is definitely the first thing they've sent me like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tingiy

 

You need to find out if there is actually a CCJ. If it is not on your credit file or the the register then there is not one, despite what HFO have said. Sight of the documents they have sent would be useful.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked with Registry Trust to see if the CCJ HAS been awarded, and if they HAVE a CCJ they CANNOT charge 12% interest, they can only charge 8% interest after a CCJ has been awarded. HFO love to totally confuse people and bully them into paying.

 

You wouldn't have had any 'You have a parcel/important documents waiting for verification" card at any time recently?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tingy, why are you even corresponding with them at this point? You need to make enquiries with the relevant courts at this stage to find out if a judgement has indeed been awarded. Start in a logical order for goodness sakes!

 

HFO/TR don't care whether you are close to suicide, are depressed, have other mental health issues etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no reference to this judgement on the registry trust there's a 99.9% chance it doesn't exist, but as a belt and braces exercise you could demand that they prove it's existence & provide the court reference number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE READ POST 31.

It seems like there was a judgment made in 2008, but it also seems strange that absolutely nothing has been done about that judgment until now. In my situation it has probably worked to my advantage as they either accept the £1 per month or make me bankrupt which I've now been waiting three years for someone to do.

 

I do feel if they're going to enforce the judgment it is unfair to keep piling on interest to let it build up to a really large sum before asking you to pay anything back, but cereb posted a link re re-claiming these charges. I'll read it again today as I was shattered last night and it didn't really sink in how I go about doing this. In any case, in my situation it probably is not worth it unless they accept the £1 per month in which case obviously I need to get the debt down as low as possible.

 

It's a tricky one to call. Do they accept the bare minimum or throw good money after bad helping me by making me bankrupt?

 

Everyone has been so helpful - I really do appreciate it thank you all!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, the CRAs may have the CCJ recorded at the old address and may think that is a different person. Funny how HFO/TR managed to find you now.

 

Try Northampton this morning with the claim number and see where the claim was sent. If it wasn't Northampton, then Wandsworth and Croydon were the other courts they used then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think that you need to get proof of this and obtain the judgement itself, if it exists at all. If you are never going to have the resources to pay this off there is little value in them pursuing it at all and £1 a month will be pointless.

 

There is no guarantee that HFO will make you bankrupt, they tend not to do that but tend to go for charging orders, if you own a house.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't own my own house - that went a while ago. Statement was from HFO. Just going to Google Northampton to see if it is genuine.

OK everyone. I have phoned Northampton and the CCJ is genuine. It has now been transferred to Guildford.

Any ideas what to do from here other than what I've already done?

Edited by Tingy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...