Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car collections threat from Welcome finance, help!


Dmliverpool
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4760 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I am new to this site, so hello everyone.

 

I have a HP car with Welcome Finance. I haven't paid them since November 2010, which says it all. I was laid off and havent got back into work yet (although I have now had 3 interviews last week and I know I will be in work by the end of this month, fingers crossed).:-D

 

In January they sent me a bogus default letter with no actual date on it as they always do.:jaw:

 

I said to them constantly that I will clear the arrears as soon as I am in work etc.

 

It's a 12k agreement and I have £6k left to pay. Last week they called me and said that I should give them back the car as I have not paid in nearly 5 months and that they are losing value on the car.

 

They also said how they will hold my account until the end of march and then they will start the collection process to terminate my account.

 

I love my car and I will likely need it to work. What should I do considering I have paid so much into it?

 

I know its a common story but its a dilemma. All my family members are saying get rid and only pay them £10 a month for the next 50-60 years, I am conscious now that my good credit is now dead:mad2::| Feel bad as I have acted with too little too late..

 

My head and heart is saying give this car back its only a car but is there anything I can do to hold them off? When I spoke to them it was like they wanted me to VT and give the car back. But as I indicated I wanted an end to this debacle, they sounded disappointed, I guess this was because they now know I wont be giving them more money etc.. haha..

 

My agreement will finish next year (Oct 2012).

 

P.S I am about to be awarded a PPI claim against them anyway (before you ask it will only be peanuts compared to what I owe.)

 

Any bits of advice would help. Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you start work would you be able to make the monthly payments plus something towards the arrears?

 

As you have paid half the balance of the agreement they would have to take you to court to get the car back, at that point you could defend and ask the judge to agree to you making monthy payments + something towards the arrears.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have paid about £2-300 under the half way mark after checking a statement. If this was to happen how long would a court give me to pay.

 

It is likely I can pay them next month, but there is the other half of me thinking the car is not worth it, if you know what I mean. I just dont want to live a fantasy. I also dont want the car to go at auction for about £2k then still owe £4k.

 

Either way I will never get a hp car every again not without getting the car then putting over 50% down in a lump sum making it hard to lose.

 

Whats the minimum about that has to be paid in which they would have to take you to court after a broken default that is farcical any way as it has no date on it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, have a look at your HP agreement - it should give you the figure you need to have paid for them to have to get a court order - should be one third.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Oh I didn't know that you can just reduce the payments they made out to mr they were taking the car. I thought what's the point. Yeah you are right about them falling apart and I think they will hit the wall in a year especially with the backdated ppi claim now being managed by the Fscs in their offices lol. They have also posted so defaults of sister companies via cargoes with by what I can gather is an empty office front with a phone plugged into the wall. I actually won my ppi case so I suggest you and all others out there make there sorry existence even worse by claiming now before a major court case holding claims as with bank charges. I put my ppi refund on the current payment so the sector is paying for their existence.

 

I will get mine reduced to spread it another six months they can moan or try take me to court I have paid over half now any way ha ha.

 

Please can you post that email address? I don't think I will make much of a plea as everyone knows they just need at least token payments so I will dominate any correspondence I make which will put me in a good place with for once.

 

Companies like them should be shut down, another tip is to tell them you are recording calls, it gets you a manager on the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...