Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

JSA firs tthree days denied


wishface
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4276 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I havejust had my first proper signing session following the start of my claim on the 3r (the interview was on the 4th). In the process of verifying my bank details it turns out that i won't get paid for the first 3 days of my claim. I was told this is standard practise now (since when I don't know). Is this right? That's a significant sum of money to arbitrarily deny someone for no apparent reason. The letter i got at the start of the week telling me my claim has been processed and that I can receive JSA makes no mention of this either. This can't be right, surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I havejust had my first proper signing session following the start of my claim on the 3r (the interview was on the 4th). In the process of verifying my bank details it turns out that i won't get paid for the first 3 days of my claim. I was told this is standard practise now (since when I don't know). Is this right? That's a significant sum of money to arbitrarily deny someone for no apparent reason. The letter i got at the start of the week telling me my claim has been processed and that I can receive JSA makes no mention of this either. This can't be right, surely?

 

 

Hi,

It's almost certain that your claim will only be payable from the date in which you fill in a Jobseekers Agreement form which clarifies that you agree to undertake the requirements neccessary in order to be elegible for Jobseekers Allowance. Where this same agreement (until signed by both you and an employment officer \ personal adviser, is where you actually confirm that you are actively seeking work. Therefore it may only be payable from the day in that benefit week to whuch you declared yourself as being available for work.

 

If you have been required to provide evidence in that you can show that you have actively been seeking work, or have actually made yourself available for work from day 1, then I can see no reason as to why you should not be entitled to claim for those 3 day's in question.

 

However, that said, I am in no way an expert on the benefits system yet, but I can tell you that you will need to keep a close eye as to what they are doing with regards to payments. I have recently been stopped 1 weeks JSA money after signing on 1 day later then I should have, after I had my days changed from a Tuesday to a Monday, which I had been previously signing on for for a few years, so it was my mistake, and I fully admit that, but to be penalised 1 weeks pay over a smple mistake in signing on 1 day late is way too harsh, (especially considering that this was the first time I had "caused" such a dispicable offence.:-). I would not of minded, but if it was that they were suspecting that I was working on the side, in which the "doubt" was raised, then I would of made sure I continued working that full week to make back the money they stopped had I of know it was going to be that harsh!

 

You have to be very careful with these people, 9 times out of 10, they hide behind the Governent abd don't guve two tosses who's lives they mess up in the process, it's just them looking after number 1.

 

So, with that in mind I would definetley get more then 1 or 2 peoples opinions on the issue, you may even be able to get a direct answer to your question if you simply phone the CAB. Either that, or do some Deep Underground Google Searching on Jobseekers Regulations. The only one other piece of advice I can give, is that you should never take what the job centre tell you at face value, and some people may criticize me for saying that, but obviously I have my reasons, and evidence to suggest there's alot of shady stuff going on, but of course, who in their right minds will go up against the government lol no win situation really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first three days of a JSA claim are known as "waiting days" and no money is payable during this time - but there are exceptions - as outlined below.

 

Claimants do not have to serve waiting days if:

1.their entitlement to JSA begins within twelve weeks of the end of their entitlement to IS, IB, ESA or CA or

2. they are young people who are only entitled to JSA because of a severe hardship direction by the Secretary of State or

3. they claim JSA and an award cannot be made because the claimant or their partner has an existing award of IS or JSA and the DM ends that award by supersession on the day immediately before the date the award on the new claim takes effect

 

(my emphasis)

 

It's in the Decision Makers Guide, paragraphs 20901 - 20904. If they are relying on the old version then they need to read the version amended in October 2009 - which is the one that I have linked to.

 

Legislative Sources:

Jobseekers Act 1995, schedule 1 paragraph 4

 

Jobseekers Allowance regulations 1996 - reg 46

 

If I remember you correctly, wishface, you have claimed ESA within the last twelve weeks. You therefore should not have to serve the waiting days.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noting Erika's qualification as above, yes, it's correct and has been standard since the year dot. In the time I worked for the DWP I was never able to get anyone to give me a satisfactory explanation as to why it's done other than "well, it's always been that way".

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same on old IB cases and SSP claims you dont get paid for the first three days, dont know about ESA

 

ESA is the same, subject to the usual rules about linking claims.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

going back to the dark ages, when it was income support (IS) and unemployment benefit (UB). (if you had NI contributions you qualified for UB and got more money as a result) but the first 3 days of UB was not paid, so if you didn't have savings, you claimed IS for those 3 days. However when JSA was introduced, both the extra money for contributions was lost, and the 3 day wait was applied to people who had no savings.

 

Hlowever, the extra £10 you got from being on UB was then docked from your housing benefit and council tax benefit, so you felt little real benefit for being on UB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 3 days waiting period actually stems back to when welfare payments first started. It was to stop people finishing work on a Friday then walking into the welfare office Friday afternoon to claim welfare payments during the weekend before returning to work on the Monday morning!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

ive just come off esa benefit after numerous operations but now im fit for work again, i phoned them on 17th of september to tell them this and a new claim was set up for jsa. my last esa payment was on the 17th monday, and my new claim has carried on from then without any breaks in claim, so my next payment was due on monday the 1st of october, but because ive switched benefit to jsa they have told me that i have to sign on on monday the 1st but wont get a payment till thusday the 4th i asked them what i will recieve they said two weeks money, so i explained that recieving my payment on thursday the 4th would mean that its 2 weeks 3 days since i last had any money, theyve told me thats just the way it is , so i have lost 3 days benefit because of this, i told the man on the phone i should of just changed over benefit on thursday the 20th from esa to jsa and maybe i wouldnt have lost any money he said it would not have made any difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...