Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

FPN for getting stuck in a (council?) field


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am new to forums so let me know if I brake any rules, I apologise in advance if I do.

 

Ok the other day I received a FPN from the police & I believe it is unfair & probably not actually plausible.

Basically I drove down a tight road but wante to turn back around & I found myself near an opening leading onto a field, now I nomally would have reversed but as it was tight I did not feel confident so I just drove forward onto the grass/land to turn around but as I did on my way back I got stuck in a boggy part.

Anyway as I was making the necessary calls to get help the police happened to drive past & spot me so decided to pull over to have a chat & eventually give me an FPN & still left me stranded there with my 1yr old son in the back

 

Now there are no signs to say do not enter the field & no gates or anything to block the way.

 

So I am wondering if anyone has any advice on how to argue this if I choose to let a magistrate decide the outcome.

It is only a £30 fine but it is the principal, there were 3 police there & 2 of them were fine until one stepped forward & decided he did not like me/had a bad day/was bullied in school or all of the above. I could tell from his collegues even they thought he was being a bit of a jobsworth.

 

Any advice help appreciated :)

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the FPN actually issued for?

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the FPN actually issued for?

Ahh sorry, basically all the officer has written is: 'used vehicle on land/elsewhere other than road'

Which is also what my drivway is isnt it? ;)

He did say I caused damage to the field which was nothing really, just a couple of black marks where my tires sunk but there were alot worse marks around the field made by other vehicles which he did not seam to care about as I said he was akward. However it does not say anything about this on my FPN but I did not know the process of what happens if I went to magistrates, will he try to add information other that what is on the ticket or is what he has written final?

Apologies for putting in the wron thread at first :S

Link to post
Share on other sites

if this was not behind a fence then its part of the highway just like pavement parking

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if it has been repealed or amended but S36 of the RTA 1972 says:

 

36.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, if without Prohibition

lawful authority a person drives a motor vehicle on to or upon

of driving

any common land, moorland or other land of whatsoever descrip-

'des

tion, not being land forming part of a road, or on any road

than on roads.

being a footpath or bridleway, he shall be guilty of an offence.

(2) It shall not be an offence under this section to drive a

motor vehicle on any land within fifteen yards of a road, being

a road on which a motor vehicle may lawfully be driven, for

the purpose only of parking the vehicle on that land.

(3) A person shall not be convicted of an offence under this

section with respect to a vehicle if he proves to the satisfaction

of the court that it was driven in contravention of this section

for the purpose of saving life or extinguishing fire or meeting

any other like emergency.

(4) It is hereby declared that nothing in this section prejudices

the operation of section 193 of the Law of Property Act 1925

(which relates to the rights of the public over commons and

waste lands), or of any byelaws applying to any land or affects

the law of trespass to land or any right or remedy to which a

person may by law be entitled in respect of any such trespass

or in particular confers a right to park a vehicle on any land.

 

So, if you said you were turning around you may find yourself stuffed and the parking exemption does not apply.

However, you could clarify in that what you intended to say was (provided it is true!) along the lines of "I pulled off the road to park so I could consult my map. I established I needed to turn around and in so doing became bogged down".

 

If you contest, I cannot see that there will be evidence to convict or that there will be a will to prosecute.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an odd one! Can you give us the location so we can take a look on street view. Sounds like a civil matter to me.

Basically I drove down the roand & ended up in a similer position to the red van & my intention was to reverse back & to the left but I had made it awkward as there was car parked to the right of me & I was too close, I aslo did not want to scuff my wheels where I needed to reverse as the street narrows & the kerb is really high etc. I should have reversed I know now I have learned a valuable lesson! It was just a lazy moment where I just thought I was taking the easy way out but the outcome could have only happened to me :) so anyway I drove on to turn around, there were nobody on the field, I did not drive fast (probabley should have eh) & did not beleive I was doing any harm but on my way back off I got stuck in a really small boggy patch which was not visible.

 

I cannot post links yet as I am new but if you google brookside crescent, walkden then you should find it. basically I went north up whittle st. do the 1st right onto the crescent & see the opening infront of the red van!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if it has been repealed or amended but S36 of the RTA 1972 says:

 

 

 

So, if you said you were turning around you may find yourself stuffed and the parking exemption does not apply.

However, you could clarify in that what you intended to say was (provided it is true!) along the lines of "I pulled off the road to park so I could consult my map. I established I needed to turn around and in so doing became bogged down".

 

If you contest, I cannot see that there will be evidence to convict or that there will be a will to prosecute.

So who thinks I should go for it :) I dont want to take too much of a risk though, I did stop to consult my map actually, did not think that was worth mentioning :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This appears to be a short crescent with access at each end so why would you want to turn around at that point? That area appears to be common land so pay the FPN is my advice. It's clear to me that the police didn't think that you were just 'trying to turn around'.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would say if you did not actually go into the field past the opening

then turn

then comeback out through the gate already facing the correct way

but got stuck doing a three point turn into the gateway

then its part of the highway and the FPN is correct.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This appears to be a short crescent with access at each end so why would you want to turn around at that point? That area appears to be common land so pay the FPN is my advice. It's clear to me that the police didn't think that you were just 'trying to turn around'.

Fair enough but it is not as open as it looks. where it bends to the left it is very narrow & I was not even sure how long it was or where it would lead me to so initially I decided to everse & turn around, not a proble, until I got a bright idea

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough but it is not as open as it looks. where it bends to the left it is very narrow & I was not even sure how long it was or where it would lead me to so initially I decided to everse & turn around, not a proble, until I got a bright idea

 

Not that I feel you should have got this ticket but rest assured the fuzz will win the day as the Magistrates Court (Formally Police Courts) tend to side with the Police unless you have a rock solid defense. If you ignore it they may just forget it what with all the cuts but then again its easy money with three of them to contend with.

 

If it were me I'd pay the thirty quid and let it die.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thats all I wanted to know. I really would have enjoyed having the power to get it thrown out just because the officer annoyed me the way he did it. (Edit)

I think my rant is over, thanks all for the help anyway

Edited by maroondevo52
Removed inappropriate language.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...