Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All I know this a long shot but ha anyone got any advice please? Nearly three years ago (maybe more) my ex took a contract out for a new phone for my birthday that I ended up paying the bills on (lovely present huh) I have always paid the bill for this. The phone number that I have had for most of my adult life was passed over to this contract and I am old now haha We are now divorced and have not been in contact  - he is abusive and I have nothing to do with him. I cannot enter into any dialogue with him whatsoever. I have continued with my phone contract and number etc but am stuck - I have no access to my bills even though they come out of my account - as the contract is in his name I cannot get a pac code to move therefore I will lose my number if I cancel- sky just quote data protection at me which I get but this is soooo frustrating!!!! I know that the sensible thing would have been to just l cancel the dd lose the number get another contract elsewhere and get over myself and move on but I am just asking out there as a final desperate attempt - can anything whatsoever be done??? Thank you in advance :)
    • What's your intent, or interest? I can't see that you have any cause of action regarding bills issued by one third party to another third party. Is the idea to use this as a lever "I'll denounce you to HMRC unless you do blah blah .." That might in fact have no teeth anyway, HMRC will aware of the company's turnover via their other tax affairs.  As a matter of fact a company buying VAT rated supplies and selling to VAT registered customers is actually worse off if not VAT registered themselves. Has your court case reached it's conclusion yet?
    • Hello, welcome to CAG.  I expect people will be along to advise later. We aren't here to mock, this is a serious forum. If you feel you're being picked on  report the relevant post to the site team.  Best, HB
    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Periodic shorthold tenency


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have tried to make head and tail of this but come to no avail, So if anyone can give me a straight answer I will be amazed!

 

Ok back 8 months ago we signed a 6 month 'Assuredshorthold Tenancy agreement'.

 

The contract states; The Term is a fixed term of 6 months from the 9th day of july 2010 for a term expiring at 10am six months from the commencement except if that day is a bank holiday or a weekend and then this tenancy will expire the previous working day.

 

So now the 6 months are up it becomes a periodic tenancy so with that the landlord must give us 2 months notice and we give the agency on his behalf one month.

 

Now on the second page of the agreement it says; the landord or Tenant may end the tenancy by giving to the other not less than two months written notice expiring at any time after the expiration of the term. Such notice cannot expire between 23rd november and 10th Febuary (inclusive) and cannot expire on a weekend or bank holiday.

 

But under section 21 of the housing act 1988 it says; Where the tenancy has become a Statutory Periodic Tenancy (where the fixed-term has ended and no new agreement signed for another fixed-term) the tenant must give the landlord notice

So My question; IS THERE SUCH THING AS A CONTRACTED PERIODIC TENANCY AND ALTHOUGH WE HAVE SIGNED THE CONTRACT SAYING WE WILL GIVE 2 MONTHS NOTICE, DOES THE HOUSING ACT NOT APPLY AFTER THE FIXED TERM HAS BEEN SERVED?

I wait to hear from any response.

Marklamar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont entirely understand the question to be totally honest.

 

The Housing Act is gospel. You need only give one months notice, to expire at the end of a rental period.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Term is a fixed term of 6 months from the 9th day of july 2010 for a term expiring at 10am six months from the commencement except if that day is a bank holiday or a weekend and then this tenancy will expire the previous working day.

 

I don't understand the above clause, appears too prescriptive to be legal, thus making it an unfair Term.

Who compiled it?

What do others think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on info provided, the fixed term AST ended on 8th Jan? and automatically became a statutory periodic tenancy on 9 Jan if T still in occupation. If rent is payable monthly the periodic conditions are precise.T can give 1 months notice provided it is served (received) on or before the day before the next rent payment due, so served by 8th of month. Even if T moves out early rent is due for the full month until the following due rent date

eg next month rent due 9 Apr, T serves notice on 21st Mar moves out 21 Apr, rent payable to 8 Apr. If T still in residence on 9 Apr reset calculator.

Link to post
Share on other sites

eg next month rent due 9 Apr, T serves notice on 21st Mar moves out 21 Apr, rent payable to 8 Apr. If T still in residence on 9 Apr reset calculator.

T will still be resident on 9 Apr if he moves out on 21 Apr, rent is therefore payable up to (and including) 8 May.

 

mariner - I think you probably just got confused with dates

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I think there is confusion we have handed our notice in on the 8th of March as our rent comes out on the 9th Of the month so we have given the agency/LL one months notice. But as we have signed a contract stating:

the landord or Tenant may end the tenancy by giving to the other not less than two months written notice expiring at any time after the expiration of the term.

 

Does this mean we still have to give two months notice? or does the housing act over rule the contract?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As stated above. Housing Act is gospel, contract is not. 1 months notice is all that is required.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well an update for all..... But thank you for all your help so far;

 

After being to see CAB (Citizens Advice Bureau) I was given some contacts for free advice, so I spoke to a very helpfull women from South west law (0117 314 6400) And she informed me that because of the contract of the fixed term had expired the clause: The landord or Tenant may end the tenancy by giving to the other not less than two months written notice expiring at any time after the expiration of the term. Still stands, even though it is now in a periodic shorthold tenancy.

 

But nether the less I have a friend who is a layer and he is looking into the whole sinario........ updates will follow!

Link to post
Share on other sites

After being to see CAB (Citizens Advice Bureau) I was given some contacts for free advice, so I spoke to a very helpfull women from South west law (0117 314 6400) And she informed me that because of the contract of the fixed term had expired the clause: The landord or Tenant may end the tenancy by giving to the other not less than two months written notice expiring at any time after the expiration of the term. Still stands, even though it is now in a periodic shorthold tenancy.

 

I will not say that words failed me. Words rarely fail me. However, I did open the window, shake my fist at the sky and cry out to heaven for vengeance. I do not believe it.

 

From what you say it is clear that you have a statutory periodic tenancy. There are occasions where the law is not black and white but this is not one of them. Section 5 (3) (e) of the Housing Act 1988 spells it out clearly:

 

The periodic tenancy referred to in subsection (2) above [i.e. a statutory periodic tenancy] is one [...] under which [...] the other terms are the same as those of the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end, except that any term which makes provision for determination by the landlord or the tenant shall not have effect while the tenancy remains an assured tenancy

 

So, so long as the tenancy is a statutory periodic tenancy and an assured tenancy, any contractual provisions relating to the giving of notice do not apply. Anyone setting themselves up to give advice to tenants, whether they charge for it or not, should know this. It is not an obscure provision contained in or arising under an old act or case that applies rarely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As stated above. Housing Act is gospel, contract is not. 1 months notice is all that is required.

 

As Aequitas said.

 

I shall quote, rinse and repeat my above post.

 

The law is absolutely clear on this.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

What do you make of Section 5 (4) of the 1988 Act?

 

(4) The periodic tenancy referred to in subsection (2) above shall not arise if, on the coming to an end of the fixed term tenancy, the tenant is entitled, by virtue of the grant of another tenancy, to possession of the same or substantially the same dwelling-house as was let to him under the fixed term tenancy.

 

 

Sub-section 4, quoted above, provides for certain circumstances in which a statutory periodic tenancy shall not arise. It refers to "the grant of another tenancy", i.e. the creation of a contractual tenancy.

 

Does it not have the effect of suppressing the creation of a statutory periodic tenancy, if a contractual periodic tenancy arises?

 

 

It seems to me that -

 

a. If there is no provision in the tenancy agreement for the tenancy to continue after the end of the initial fixed term, it would become a Statutory Periodic Tenancy.

 

b. If the tenancy agreement does make provision for the tenancy to continue, on a month by month basis, at the end of the fixed term, it would become a Contractual Periodic Tenancy.

 

c. The Housing Act 1988 does not specify any notice period in respect of a notice given by the tenant, therefore the notice period is of a contractual nature; hence the period of notice agreed in the tenancy agreement would therefore apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...