Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4846 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What would you consider is reasonable?

 

It's student accommodation with a 12 month AST which expires in August 11.

 

Landlord tells me it is now prime time advertising for the Autumn and asked whether my offspring is planning to stay, which is the plan but since agreeing that it should be re-advertised, there has been a viewing almost daily! (6 in 10 days)

 

The landlord also arranged a viewing on Sunday without prior agreement and just called to advised that it had been arranged.

 

Can the students refuse the landlord/agent access if it is not a convenient time for them?

 

The agent also has a key, is that reasonable? Are they allowed to access without one of the current tenant being at the house?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The nature of student letting is that it comes in short sharp bursts like this.

 

Under the specific context described, I wouldnt say it is unreasonable.

 

However, reasonable or otherwise, the tenants have a right to refuse access for a viewing without reason, should they so desire.

 

However, my personal advice would be to allow whatever viewings practical, as unfortunately this is the way student lets go. BUT, it would be fair and reasonable to say to the agent that they should not be entering the property under any circumstances if no one is present unless they have the permission of the tenants.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input, Mr Shed.

 

So far, the agent has only been round by appointment, so we will just have to see how it goes.

 

I expect they will have more problems from the landlord, who likes to just let himself in without knocking, he does phone but gives little notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another 2 viewings yesterday but also one today and the estate agent let themselves in!

 

Who do we complain to, the agent or landlord?

 

Unfortunately the LL has a tendency to have a rant (very seriously at times) and I know he will say that it is the interests of the existing tenants that want to stay, to get the house filled up again. But surely we can put a limit or restriction on the amount of viewings per week?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another 2 viewings yesterday but also one today and the estate agent let themselves in!

 

Who do we complain to, the agent or landlord?

 

Unfortunately the LL has a tendency to have a rant (very seriously at times) and I know he will say that it is the interests of the existing tenants that want to stay, to get the house filled up again. But surely we can put a limit or restriction on the amount of viewings per week?

 

It's allways best to try and get on with your LL/Agent and arrange times convenient to you both,But

 

The LL/Agent have to give you at least 24 hours in writing and if it's still not convenient to you the tenant,you dont have to let them in.

 

If the LL/Agent are just letting them self in,Change the locks and make surer you dont cause any damage to the LL locks and door and put them back when you leave.

 

Tenants have the right to privacy and not to have LL/Agent showing strangers around when ever it suits them..

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Changing the locks just isn't a practical option as it is a student share and I know the landlord would be a nightmare if we did this!

 

The LL can be very trying at times, I think I will just point out to them what has happened today and see what sort of reaction we get.

 

The agent could say they knocked first but the students say they did not hear anything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Changing the locks just isn't a practical option as it is a student share and I know the landlord would be a nightmare if we did this!

 

The LL can be very trying at times, I think I will just point out to them what has happened today and see what sort of reaction we get.

 

The agent could say they knocked first but the students say they did not hear anything!

 

If its just one door,change it and get keys cut to the rest of the students,if you dont do anythink your LL/Agent are just going to carry on abusing your rights to privacy.

 

Just because you renting a house/flat/room or what ever doesnt give your LL/Agent to come in when ever they like showing strangers around................

 

What would your LL/Agent say if you had keys to there homes and went around showing strangers around Unannounced..

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear...

 

Is this a student house with seperate lockable rooms and a communal area? Or a house let in its entirety to 1 group of students?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is an HMO let under a joint AST .

 

No locks on individual rooms, which is another bone of contention but I am told by the local housing dept that this is standard practice nowadays. Although my other son is in a house with locks on all their bedrooms.

 

There are communal areas

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so it is a single joint AST?

 

In that case, my personal opinion would be simply to write to them, politely but firmly, stating that they have no permission to enter the property without a tenant being there and allowing access. I wouldnt go to the stage of changing the locks before this.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I think changing locks is extreme unless absolutely necessary.

 

Not sure what you mean by single/joint AST?

 

It's one AST between 5 students with joint and several liability.

 

I will put it in writing to the LL as it may have been a different estate agent to the one that had previously been round

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what I mean by a single joint AST, sorry - basically, that they are all on the one tenancy, not each with seperate.

 

Personally, I would put it to the agents not the LL - it is the agents who are actually entering not the LL. But...likely to have the same result in any event tbh.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dotty50

 

I agree with Mr Shed write to the letting agent pointing out that they need to give you 24hrs notice in writing.

 

Yes your Letting Agent/Landlord is allowed reasonable access to the property but must give you the tenants at least 24hours notice in writing, if they continue to use the clause we gave you a phone call but no one answered put it in your letter that you want notified in writing 24hr minimum in advance and that one of the tenants must be present.

 

Please bear in mind you have a right to privacy and the agent/landlord just letting themselves in wrong because who is to say they havent done this before and went looking at your individual property or worse something is stolen from the property. They are not being reasonable with you the tenants and have no write to let themselves into that property for viewings the way they are doing.

 

As for changing the locks be careful with that as you would have to put that in writing to the letting agent/landlord requesting permission to do this and you would still have to give the letting agent/landlord a set of keys for the new locks.

 

Hope this help

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stu just for some clarity to your post:

 

- The word "must" in terms of 24 hours written notice is a little bit pointles hence why I have intentionally avoided it. They dont really have to, there is nothing mandating this in law. Moreover, agreements can be made between agent and tenant to allow access other than this. Also, if you look at it from the agents perspective in the interests of fairness, giving 24 hours written notice every time they want to view a prospective tenant would make it quite restrictive for them. In any event, 24 hours written notice cant be physically enforced in any way.

 

- Whilst I agree changing the locks shouldnt be done lightly, that is only in order to prevent getting the LLs back up. There is no requirement for written permission, nor do the keys have to be provided. Of course, they should be advised in writing that you have done so.

 

Sorry to pick apart the post, not meaning to ;) just correcting/embellishing a couple of points.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting Stu.

 

No intention of changing locks, the original question was what is reasonable as far as viewings are concerned, as in the amount.

 

All the viewings have been by pre-arranged appointment, apart from one that the LL arranged himself and told the students he was coming and when.

 

It was only once, today that an agent let themselves in and one of the students has always been there so far.

Edited by Dotty50
Removed a sentence due to clarification in further post that crossed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting Stu.

 

No intention of changing locks, the original question was what is reasonable as far as viewings are concerned, as in the amount.

 

All the viewings have been by pre-arranged appointment, apart from one that the LL arranged himself and told the students he was coming and when.

 

It was only once, today that an agent let themselves in and one of the students has always been there so far.

 

It isnt extreme changing the locks,it's to protect your privacy and safely,but if your happy with Agent and strangers come in when ever they like that's your choice..

 

Ask yourself this

 

How many times has the LL/Agent let themself in when you and everyone else where out and have had a nose around at your personal belongings !

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

House has now been re-let to a new group so looks like we have some house searching to do!

 

Not happy, thought we had found somewhere for the 3 years duration which was ideal but that is landlords for you, only one interest........................ THEMSELVES!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...