Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you mean you did aos on mcol yes? pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.   dx  
    • The Letter of Claim information is not absolutely essential, but it would be useful for two reasons. Firstly, judges take a dim view of companies or individuals who rush to court without giving the other party notice and a chance to settle - the Letter of Claim.  If they didn't send it we could include this point in your defence and it would be detrimental to them. Secondly, we know Countrywide.  They are a very small cowboy company.  The are reluctant to do court, simply becasue they are very bad  at it.  Their record of beating Caggers in front of a judge is exactly 0%.  They have lost every time.  They send the Letter of Claim also to look for people who don't reply, thinking that the person might not reply to a claim form either, giving them an easy default win.  Conclusion - always best to reply to a Letter of Claim and ridicule the PPC's case.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MATC V Natwest


MassesAgainstTheClasses
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello to all, I'm new here and have been advised by my sister (following a successful reclaim herself) to reclaim my charges.

 

I have read the FAQ and know where I need to send my SAR (thanks Kulmeister), but one question I have I cant find anywhere on here so:

 

Over the last six years I have had two main accounts but I'm fairly sure I had another account whilst at Uni (i.e. within the last six years) but I cant recall the account number nor do I have any of the statements (i usually shred them after a few years).

 

It may well be that only my account type was changed (i.e. from "Step" to a normal current account) and not the account number, if you get my drift?

 

So the question is, when sending the SAR I list the known account numbers at the top of the page, can I also add something along the lines of "and any other accounts in my name over the last six years" or do I need the actual account numbers?? If its the latter would the bank disclose this info to me if I were to ask (does that come under the data protection act)?

 

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

MATC

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if you can be that vague but I have one question. was that account "unknown" open in October 2002? If yes then I can help you with the account number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the response, I was just wondering if on my natwest "file" there would be records of older/closed accounts?

 

In response to your question all I can say is that if I did have another account (and remember I'm not sure it was a separate account) theres a good chance it was active in 2002.

 

I do realise how ridiculously vague this answer is!! :)

 

Thanks,

 

MATC

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if I call NW tomorrow they should tell me straight off simply by asking for the details of all other accounts I have held?

 

Whats the relevance of October 2002? Do they only hold 4 years worth of info on the system?

 

Thanks for helping btw.

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) posted 14/09/2006

 

Delivered 15/09/2006

 

"Your item with reference xxxxxxxxxxxxx was delivered from our WEST EDINBURGH Delivery Office on 15/09/06 .

Thank you for using this service.

 

The electronic Proof of Delivery is not available for this item"

 

Do I need to pay for a copy of the signature or is my date stamped receipt sufficient?

 

Thanks

 

MATC

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 14/09/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah it will be fine. Im sure they got it. They haven't argued about this much before. You can called Joyce Tudor whos number is in the contact details for NatWest if you need to chase it up.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...