Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can trust deed affect ppi claim !!


royalscot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Im assisting my brother in law in trying to reclaim his PPI
link3.gif
from the Clydesdale Bank

 

We have had the SAR
link3.gif
returned and there are four loans , they are consolidation loans one paying the other off , culminating in a loan for nearly £20,000 .

 

After a time he couldnt meet the £260 monthly repayments so entered into a trust deed which he has just completed after three years

 

I would like to know if it is possible to claim some of the PPI back under these circumstances

 

regards

 

rs

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I've not got a clue, wondered if this link might help..................

 

http://www.trust-deed.co.uk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=637

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Scott ,

 

Dunno wether to claim or not , if hes out of the trust deed then surely they have nothing more to do with his finances

 

Just surprised they never issued a claim on his behalf during the life of the trust deed , as suggested this has been known to be done .

 

I`ll hang off for the moment to see if any fellow caggers can advise further .

 

regards

 

rs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If the trustee has not already claimed the ppi, then your brother is free to do so.

 

B

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for getting back to me Bluedogx

 

Based on this document.....http://s876.photobucket.com/albums/a...scan0001-3.jpg

 

On what basis could he claim back his PPI , hes not self -employed and i havent came across such a document .

 

Regards

 

rs

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to check the policy document itself for terms, exclusions etc.

 

Also - did he request the insurance when he took out the loan?

 

Was he told he could get insurance elsewhere, possibly cheaper?

 

Did he take the insurance because he was given the impression he would not get the loan without it?

 

Any or all of these would mean the ppi was mis sold and can definitely be reclaimed

 

Looking at the document, were all the statements against the tick boxes explained to your brother? It looks like a standard 'disclaimer' type document the bank would keep to 'show' that all was well with the ppi sale :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
can we claim back ppi if we had cleared our Trust Deed since June 11

 

Shouldnt be a problem ....my brother got all his back ....sorry i should have finished this thread off by letting you all know of the end result .

 

regards

rs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've made claims on some debts I had which were paid off via a Trust deed discharged in 2005. RBS have agreed to refund PPI but have retained the £1100 as payment towards the debt. The financial ombudsmen is now involved and whilst RBS have asked for confirmation the Trust deed is discharged, and I have sent this to them, they replied they now wish to wait for the FOS to tell them what to do.Ironically another debt in conjunction with the same Trust Deed is a Halifax loan, and they have already issued a cheque for £2,820.So there appears to be no seet approach across the banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've made claims on some debts I had which were paid off via a Trust deed discharged in 2005. RBS have agreed to refund PPI but have retained the £1100 as payment towards the debt. The financial ombudsmen is now involved and whilst RBS have asked for confirmation the Trust deed is discharged, and I have sent this to them, they replied they now wish to wait for the FOS to tell them what to do.Ironically another debt in conjunction with the same Trust Deed is a Halifax loan, and they have already issued a cheque for £2,820.So there appears to be no seet approach across the banks.

 

Well done Paul , i would expect the fos to ask RBS to cough up in the near future ......RBS digging the heels in whilst HBOS pay up

 

regards

 

rs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...