Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This happened approx 18 months - 2 years ago. I have not been out of pocket. eBay instantly paid the money to me and then investigated once the buyer claimed the item did not arrive. They favoured towards the buyer and therefore made my ebay account minus £9000. Subsequently the ebay account got suspended and I since cut ties with it and no longer have access to it.  
    • Regarding "No breach of contract" where they have used E instead of F and that incorrect post code has always been there in subsequent PCNs including the first one,  does that not make it a valid point? because contract shows different postcode then PCN,  also if valid can this be moved under different section such as "No Locus Standi"? Since there is no mention of EV charging bay or its abuse in contract,  can same fact in point 3.1 be used under "No breach of contract"?  does the grace period of 10 minutes needs to be mentioned in terms and conditions signage?  
    • I am looking to help my father who has received a court summons for a RTA S87 (1) offence for not having a licence when requested to produce it by the police in December 2023 At the time of the alleged contravention my father was in the process of having his licence renewed following him turning 79 years of age in September 2023 (the licence is due for renewal every 3 years as i understand it). On the renewal application my dad disclosed a medical condition (Sleep Apnoea) and naturally, this resulted in a lot of follow up between the DVLA and his doctor, however his Doctor was not aware of any medical reason why he should not drive, and he continued to drive under S88 of the RTA. At no point was his licence revoked by the DVLA, however the DVLA did write to him in December 2023 to advise that they have been advised of another potential medical issue and asked him to provide details within 14 days or his licence may be revoked- he replied with the information and within 6 weeks his new licence was issued (the issue was not current, and is not affecting him now)   The alleged offence took place while the DVLA were processing his renewal, and given my father knew that he was fit to drive, he continued to do so. I am in some ways surprised that this has even progressed to court, because surely the fact that his license was eventually renewed in Feb-24 validates his belief that he was always fit to drive- nothing changed in his medical condition between September 2023 and the licence eventually being renewed in Feb-24.  Does anyone have any advice for how to handle this one? I have written to his doctor with a SAR to request the details disclosed between them and the DVLA, and for any other information that will help his defence. I was considering writing to the court to ask if the case could be held local to my Father, as the alleged offence took place far from his home- is this something likely to be granted?  
    • We tend to square the circle here rather than go along with the general consensus and what the media would have you believe  
    • And incidentally, the fact that you sell things and it's not your main source of income is not so far as I understand it, the legal test of whether or not you are trading.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Black horse vt help needed please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4828 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I recently sent a letter to Blackhorse Finance explaining that I want to VT my agreement for my car finance under the 50% rule. I am going to attach the agreement.

To date I have paid 32 monthly instalments of £208.29 which I get to a total of £6665.28.

In the paragraph headed "Termination your rights" on the agreement it states that I can end the agreement once I have paid £6,175.21. I also paid a £2,000 advance payment but even not including this £2,000 I have still paid over the amount they are saying I need to have paid. I have received a letter from Blackhorse today saying that I still owe them £1,044.48. Could anyone advise me what I should do about their request for the extra money. I do not see how I can still owe them anything.

Any advice or help will be gratefully received. Thank you.

 

blackhorse edited.jpg

 

I'm not sure if I have attached the document correctly but I hope it is viewable :???:

Edited by lisa55
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lisa, welcome to the forums.

 

The 50% volutary termination rule allows an individual to terminate a hire-purhcase agreement at any point. If they do so they limit their liability to 50% of the finance. Since you have paid your 32 instalments AND the deposit you are well over the 50% point.

 

Did you make it clear that you wanted to VT under Section 99 of the Consumer Credit Act? If you have then Black Horse are playing silly buggers and you should consider a formal complaint.

 

If you can let us know about the termination letter we will be able to give you further advice.

 

Best wishes,

 

Seq.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your replies. I have inserted below the letter that I sent to Black Horse regarding terminating the agreement, I did state, as you can see, that I wanted to terminate under section 99. I have since had a telephone call from Black Horse presumably because I wrote to them asking them to explain where they have got the figure that they are requesting from. I did not answer their call as I have requested everything to be put in writing. They left a message for me to call them back but I haven't for the same reason. Do you think I should just wait for them to wrote to me??

Lisa

 

Customer Services

Black Horse

St William House

Tresillian Terrace

Cardiff

CF10 5BD

15th February 2011

Voluntary Termination of Agreement

Agreement Number: XXXXXXXX

Alfa Romeo 147 Diesel Hatchback 1.9 JTD 16v Multijet Lusso

Registration Number: XXXXXXX

Dear Sir/Madam

I am writing to notify you that I am exercising my right to terminate the above agreement under Section 99 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I have now paid over the amount of the termination agreement figure so will not be making any further payments with regards to this account.

Please send me details of how the vehicle can be returned to you.

Please confirm receipt of this request by telephone to me on XXXXXXX or by email XXXXXXXX

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the basis of their demand? You might be liable if it relates to damage to the vehicle. If not and it relates to the balance on the agreement after sale of the vehicle, you aren't liable. Unless, of course, they had already terminated for arrears prior to you exercising a VT.

 

Hi They just state that that is the amount still payable under the agreement. It doesn't relate to any damage to the vehicle because at that time they had not got the vehicle back, nor did they terminate the agreement for arrears prior to me exercising a VT, all payments have been made on time & I have never missed a payment. I have written to them asking to explain what this amount due is due for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that further info, it looks like you're doing things perfectly. Other than damage mentioned by Gaston the other stuff they can charge for could be insurance policies and suchlike. Did you have any of those?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that further info, it looks like you're doing things perfectly. Other than damage mentioned by Gaston the other stuff they can charge for could be insurance policies and suchlike. Did you have any of those?

 

Hi the only other thing on my agreement is for a 'NAC Guarantee' (which is not worth the paper it's written on actually and I would strongly advise anyone thinking about purchasing this NOT TO!)

The cost of this so called guarantee was £1795.00, they charged me £456.20 for the credit so the total cost of the guarantee was £2251.20 (yes I was conned well and truly!)

Now the monthly amount I paid for this was £37.52, however this £37.52 was included in the monthly payment of £208.29 which I paid to Blackhorse for the car finance.

I have paid 31 instalments of £37.52 = £1163.12.

As I stated previously that the guarantee was a total waste of money, I had many many problems with my Alfa and whenever my mechanic telephoned NAC to claim for the repairs they were told "It's fair wear and tear it's not covered" this happened on several occassions and my mechanic did state that I had been ripped off. I was told by the salesman that I would never have to pay for any repairs again and that the guarantee covered everything you could think of, I stupidly believed him and signed on the dotted line.

I have looked up NAC Guarantee on google and it seems many people have had the exact same problem! If it turns out that the amount owing is because of this guarantee then I am seriously considering taking legal action against Carcraft who sold me the guarantee as I believe I was mis-sold it.... any suggestions or advice on this??

Link to post
Share on other sites

SUCCESS!!! :-D

Just an update on my previous posts...

As I assumed the money that Blackhorse said I owed to them was for the NAC Warranty that I was sold (miss-sold). I decided to look at the paperwork properly for this warranty and there was a complaints department for CC Automotive who provide the warranty that the customer could write to if they were not happy with any service or product they had received.

I wrote a lengthy letter to CC Automotive explaining how I felt that I was miss lead when I purchased the warranty from Carcraft and that I had spent well over £1000 in repairs that I was lead to believe the warranty would cover but didn't.

I posted this letter but in the meantime Blackhorse sent me an email saying they wanted to know what arrangements I was intending to make to pay the £1044.48 that was outstanding on my account. I replied to Blackhorse telling them that I was in the process of making a complaint to CC Automotive regarding the Warranty and that I had also been in touch with Consumer Direct, I asked Blackhorse if they would hold off any further action regarding the outstanding money until I had received a reply from CC Automotive.

Within 24 hours I received a reply from Blackhorse asking if I had ever claimed on the warranty and if not then the warranty could be cancelled. I replied stating that I had not made a claim on the warranty (chance would have been a fine thing!) I received an immediate reply from Blackhorse stating that the warranty had been cancelled and that now I did not owe them any money, my balance is ZERO!

I am so relieved at the outcome but it just goes to show that if I had just accepted that I had to pay for the warranty as I had signed up for it then I would be over £1000 out of pocket.

Thank you for all your replies and help.

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...