Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Car repossessed, only 1 month behind, not received Termination letter..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok,

 

Am about to put together my letter of complaint, so it can go recorded first thing in the morning - I also intend to fax it to their collections dept.

 

I think I should be doing the following:

 

 

  1. Request that no sale of the the vehixcle takes place until this complaint has been dealt with in full.
  2. Point out that no DN was ever received.
  3. Point out that they collected a payment on 14th Jan, therefore account was not in 2 months arrears on the date they said they sent out the DN (07th Jan) And that surely the taking of such payment would have indeed rectified said unreceived DN?
  4. Point out that we received 2 letters dated 31st Jan, confirming that ALL outstanding monies would be collected on 14th Feb via the (live) DDMandate.
  5. Point out that no Termination notice has been received.
  6. Point out that repo agent coerced me into handing over the keys, after threatening to get a truck and have the vehicle opened and towed in front of my neighbours, incurring a further £400 charge.
  7. Point out that their removal of my vehicle from my PRIVATE driveway without a Court Order is, in fact an illegal act.
  8. Point out that I was not given the chance to remove over £1400 worth of accessories that I have fitted to the car since purchase, and that these remain my property, nor do they have my permission to interfere with, remove or dispose of these items.
  9. Demand immediate return of my vehicle and it's fitted accessories OR repayment of all sums paid to date since May 2010 (circa £4800) failing which I will issue proceedings in the County Court without further notice, for the above sum, plus costs and compensation.

How does that sound?

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, just drafted this to fax over to the collection agents:

 

 

Further to my two telephone calls to you on Fri 11th, during which I was passed through to Brian Rxxxxxx, I am still awaiting contact to arrange for me to attend and remove the following items of my personal property from the above vehicle:

 

 

1. Sunell MDR-4104 multi channel video recording system and associated mounts.

2. Three internal CCTV cameras and associated mounts.

3. 4.3” widescreen TFT monitor and associated cables.

4. Snooper Laser Star twin head system and associated mounts and cables.

5. Prescription driving glasses.

6. Blue “disabled” badge in name of Mr GSMGuy snr and time card.

7. Mini compressor.

8. Taxi radio wiring harness.

 

Please note that you do not have my permission to tamper with, remove or otherwise dispose of my property, and that said property does not form part of the standard specification of the vehicle, having been supplied and fitted by myself.

 

I await your call to arrange a convenient time for myself or my agent to attend. I may be contacted directly on 0xxxxxxx

 

Lets see if I get a call back..

 

Now to draft the letter to Santander..

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps you should have added that all equipment will be tested first prior to removal to ensure that it is still in good working condition and if anything is found to be faulty, they wil be held responsible. Prior to getting into the vehicle to remove anything, have a good walk around ansd take photos if necessary. the same applie son entering vehicle, check back and the front and take photos of equipement if necesary. The onus will be on them to prove equipment was not faujlty prior to removal of vehicle. Hopefully in the meantime you are registered for JSA and benefits as you have been deprived of your livelihood through no fault of your own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will check operation - When I eventually get a call back, just been onto Santander, their collections dept are refusing to speak to me now, saying the recovery agent are handling the account - Theu could not comprehend that, as the agreement is with them, then that is who I wish to speak to...

 

Got a fax No for them though, and the postal address - Just about to draft up letter - Can anyone tell me the exact reference/section of the CCA that I need to quote re the illegal posession, and the fact that we did not receive a DN or terminsation notice AND that they took a payment AFTER the date they say they sent out a DN...

 

Not going to claim jobseekers, have rented a car @ £170 per week, BUT it means that we cannot go anywhere as a family, as we need a seven seater, which ours was...

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will ring TS now - Just as an aside, been checking the payment dates etc, they are as follows:

 

 

  • 01/11/10 Normal payment £368.33 made by DD - Account fully up to date, no previous payments late or missed.
  • 01/12/10 1st payment missed.
  • 17/12/10 Letter received, dated 14/12/10 advising of missed payment and late payment charge totalling £393.33 (not a DN).
  • 24/12/10 Letter received, dated 21/12/10 reminding of overdue payment of £393.33 (not a DN) enclosing a new DDM, although still live on account.
  • 03/01/11 Letter received, dated 31st Dec advising of late fee, and saying "Any amount that remains outstanding on or after 14th Jan will be collected via DD" - So we made sure there would be 2 payments plus fees available, as we knew thats what we owed.
  • 10/01/11 Letter received, dated 07/01/11 saying they had not collected Jan 1st payment, making total £786.66 (2 x payments + 2 x late charges of £25) and enclosing yet another DDM, filled in and returned (2 DDM's now live on account).
  • 11/01/11 Single monthly payment of £368.33 taken via one of the DD mandates funds were funds available for 2 payments plus the fees, so don't understand why they only took £368.33, when their letter dated 31st Jan said they would collect full amount.
  • 18/01/11 Letter received dated 15th Jan advising arrears were £443.33, ie one payment plus 2 x £25 late fees.
  • 24/01/11 Letter received, dated 21st Jan, exactly same as letter received 18th Jan, BUT now advising arrears of only £368.33 ie one month only also included, was yet another DDM saying please enclose a cheque for the o/s payment of £368.33 when you send back the DDM - Checked with bank, and they had TWO live DDM's for Santander, one of which had been used for the payment taken on 11/01/11! Did not send back the third DDM.
  • 03/02/11 Letter received, dated 31st Jan again advising of late fees and again stating "Any amount that remains outstanding on or after 14th feb will be collected via DD" So once again, we made sure there were sufficient funds available.
  • 10/02/11 Repo man turned up and took car from driveway.

That's the story to date, with all the letters etc thrown in, just so that someone can clarify, if possible that they are definately in the wrong?

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

It reads as if you are totally in the right. Perhaps your letter to Santander should be a "Letter before Action" listing the above and also claiming back the illegal £25 charges in addition to the claim for compensation, however if you go down thsi route be prepared to follow it through to the small claims court. You will need to demonstrate proof of all of th above and also the losses and inconvenienc that was casued to you by Santander.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Surfer01 - Just waiting on a call back from TS - Have spoken to "Which Legal Services" and they advise writing to them, saying they have breached the contract due to their maladministration and trespass, and as such demand the car back within 7 days, after which I will issue in the small claims court, BUT what am I issueing for?? total amount paid to date under agreement is £4854.98, so am I after that much plus compensation, or suing for the return of the car?

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be issuing for return of car etc, as soon as possible, however on return of car you should still be suing for out fo pocket expenses and also compensation. I am surprised that this was not mentioned to you by Which legal line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So,

 

Letter before action, demanding return of car within seven days, or I will commence proceedings in the county court for return of vehicle, plus costs and compensation? Should I mention my equipment & belongings still being with the car, and their value, and also that I hold them liable for the safekeeping of those items?

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok,

 

Drafted this so far - As the agreement is actually in my Wife's name, I have included an "authority to act" paragraph..

 

 

Santander Consumer South

3 Princess Way

Redhill

SURREY

RH1 1SR

By Recorded Delivery & Fax to 0871 5225958

Letter before Action - Re: Agreement No: 100-1001-xxxxx-xx

 

This letter before action is being issued because:

 

  • You have breached the above agreement due to your maladministration.
  • You have illegally repossessed the goods from private property, with neither a Court Order, nor my informed consent.
  • You have failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement, specifically those relating to missed payments, default notices and the actions you will take.

·

As such, I demand the return of the goods to myself within SEVEN days of the date of this letter. Failure to return the goods will result in me commencing legal proceedings without further notice. Such proceedings will include, but not be limited to;

 

  • Requesting an order to return the goods forthwith.
  • Repayment of all monies paid by myself under the agreement.
  • Reimbursement for personal possessions and equipment still with the vehicle, and therefore taken illegally which constitutes theft, and has been recorded under Crime Reference No: xxxxxxxxxxx with Merseyside Police, list of items enclosed.
  • Costs of hiring alternative transport.
  • Compensation for inconvenience and other costs incurred.

As the agreement is now in dispute, then in accordance with OFT guidelines, you should instruct the recovery agent not to dispose of the vehicle, pending possible Court Proceedings.

 

I hereby authorise you to deal with my partner, Mr GSMGuy, in relation to this matter, and furthermore, you may disclose to him, any personal information relating to this account, or myself without further authority from me. Mr GSMGuy also has my full authority to act on my behalf in this matter.

I trust that Court Action will not be necessary, and look forward to the prompt return of both the goods, and my personal possessions and belongings.

Comments?

 

 

Mike

 

PS - Just had a call back from the recovery agent - Apparently the car has now been deposited at the Auction, COMPLETE with all of my equpment and posessions!!!!!

Edited by GSMGuy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Include that no default notice was issued in accordance with regualtions. Consider wording "as such, I demand the return of the goods (plus suitable compensation yet to be determined) to myself within SEVEN days of the date of this letter." This will then still allow you to pursue for damages and compensation. Obviously amend the above as you wish as I am no expert legal jungle etc. Don't let them give back your vehciel adn walk away. Nail the b.......ds for the inconvenience as the law is on your side.

Most other caggers will come Online tonight and will be able to advise better and be able to quote regulations as I am struggling at bit at the moment and can only offer general advice except send everything by recorded mail for a signature so that it can be tracked. Even better if you can addressed it to someone personally rather than a department.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just about to fax and post letter - BUT as car is now at auction - With my possessions... I wonder what will happen when they get the fax/letter.

 

I am tempted to put into the letter that the recovery agent told me that it was at auction, and suggesting that they do something about it - NOW!

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, just spoken to "ebt Recovery Dept" she was very dismissive at first, until I pointed out, that after they "supposedly" sent out a DN (never received) on 07/01/11 - They went on to collect money via DD, AND write to us informing us of future payments and collection dates... She then said "This doesn't make sense to me, will pass you to Mgr" Mgr came on phone and said he would speak to collection agent re car - Came back and told me that they would "see if there is anyone capable of removing the equipment at the auction house" To which I replied - No chance, I want to remove it myself, I fitted it!

 

I then informed Mgr to expect faxed and recorded delivery LBA, and he agreed to notate the account - Fax just gone, so off to the post office....

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheeky b@r steward of a repo man has just been back to house whilst I am at work, to return my sunglasses from the car. Mrs Gsm refused to sign his receipt... That was the first time he had ever seen her, as she was out when they took the car. So I can't wait until they try and say they had her permission to take it, as the agreement is in her sole name..

 

Mike

Edited by GSMGuy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mrs gsm has just had a missed call on her mobile, saying "please call santander on 0844 xxxxxx to arrange collection of your property and belongings from the vehicle before 5 pm today..."

 

Firstly, how are we supposed to get to manchester with 5 children, as they are on half term holidays, to do so, and surely less than 2 hours notice is totally unacceptable, as I am out at work at the moment..

 

I am minded to fax or write, accepting their offer, and asking them to contact me me arrange a time for them to bring our car back here, so that I can remove the equipment in the same way I fitted it, ie my private garage..

 

I am unwilling and unable to travel to retrieve my property, and anyway, why should I, when they have taken it illegally?

 

Also, plod have just been on, they reckon that it's not theft as "the original appropriation was not illegal ( my @rse!) And therefore santander believe they have a right to the property to offset against the debt" I explained that they had taken it from private property without a court order, which IS illegal, their response was.. Civil matter... Bloody waste of space..

Edited by GSMGuy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, well, well...

 

Two letters from Santander received today;

 

 

  • Letter dated 16th Feb, acknowledging our complaint and enclosing complaints procedure etc, inside a franked envelope with Santander logo on it - I have no idea HOW they have managed to mis-spell our surname, it must be on every screen of their system in relation to the agreement..
  • Another letter dated 2nd Feb - Which in fact IS a termination notice - Again posted in a Santander envelope WITHOUT any postage! It HAS been through the postal system though, as it bears the barcode imprint that the rest of todays mail has.. I suspect Santander are trying to cover their backs by issuing a Termination Notice AFTER they have reposessed the car.

2ci75ad.jpg

 

Does this sound strange to anyone else? I am going to get a Solicitors' advice - Friend of family, and gets a lot of work from me so will be FOC - Hopefully..

 

Mikepencil.png

Edited by GSMGuy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok,

Solicitor instructed, he's doing it foc, which is a relief. He had read through the agreement, and also all the correspondence received to date. He feels they have definitely breached the agreement, and as such is writing to them tonight.. Will post contents of letter once I get my faxed copy..

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, just spoken to Solicitor, letters have gone out to both Santander and the repo agent yesterday, along with copies to me..

 

However, received today from DVLA, is a letter telling me they have had an application from a new keeper... I have phoned them and told them the car was taken without permission, and also given them the crime reference number. So it looks like Santander have gone ahead and sold our car along with our posessions and belongings too!

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching with interest, please keep us all updated.

 

This is absolutely criminal! :-x

By day, computer and mobile phone technical support... by night home mechanic and Rover / MG enthusiast!

 

Cars: 1998 Rover 620ti

Computers: HP nc8430 Business Notebook, Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Sol wrote to both of them (Santander and recovery Co) First thing they wanted, was a signed authority to act - Which was already included.. Now they say they need to speak with Mrs GSM on the phone - I have told her to refer them to the Solicitors, if it's anything other than a call to arrange rerurn of the car and contents. We are now £510 out of pocket with vehicle rental alone, and this will increase by £170 come Friday...

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...