Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You need a back up plan. If you believe that redundancy is very likely, start looking at other employment options.  Don't leave it until you have been made redundant before looking for new employment. I regularly speak to people who have been made redundant and about mental health. Those who have a positive plan, get into employment quickly following redundancy and manage to maintain their finances. Those who don't have a plan, decide to accept redundancy and a period of unemployment. They end up in a downward spiral, with redundancy money spent, debts accumulated, mental health decline and difficulty finding new employment.  
    • Interested observer here as I'm in a similar situation. People become conditioned into seeking and maintaining a perfect credit score/file, but if your situation is that you're unlikely to obtain further credit for the foreseeable future anyway due to your other outstanding debts, then tanking your credit file now won't make a difference other than you've took back control of your finances.
    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sky Refusing to Accept BACS/Bank Transfer


TriP
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3994 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As the title says. I have an outstanding bill which someone has kindly offered to pay on my behalf. the money would be coming from a foreign account, and the ONLY way that it will be paid is via bank transfer directly to sky. the other party involved is not willing to first transfer the money into my UK account, or use any other payment method. however this is besides the point -- Sky are simply REFUSING to provide me with bank details, claiming they "only accept direct debit/credit card payments/bank giros."

 

is this even legal? can a company demand payment and then refuse to provide you with their bank details? if you're a business customer, sky has no problem providing you with their bank details -- what's with the fuss for residential customers? i spent the better part of 2 hours speaking to their outsourced minimum-wage slaves and supervisors about this, and always received the same scripted answer. one of them even had the gall to tell me i should have the money transferred into "a friend's account, provided it was a UK account, because as long as the sort code and account number are correct the account holder's name shouldn't be a problem" and then have him pay it out to me, to pass on to sky. meaning basically the 'advisor' told me to try to trick my foreign family member into thinking they were paying sky when in fact the money would be going into someone else's account to pass on to me.

 

on top of this, sky has been threatening me with legal action for about a month now, and i am getting nowhere with them -- if they want their money so badly, then why can't i simply transfer the funds directly? it's rediculous. i've never encountered this problem with any other company.

Edited by TriP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky no longer offer this as an option. Any business can decide in which way they prefer payments.

 

Unless you already have a giro slip with the credit acc no and sort code and use the account number as a reference number but please be aware this may not automatically get allocated to your account and can take some time as it is not a preferred method of payment and you may need to supply copy of your friends bank payments details to trace the payment.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

really? there is something about this that just seems extremely shifty to me. is this just british regulation? the rest of europe seems to have caught on to the fact that electronic bank transfers are the norm by now. why should sky be entitled to my bank details and at the same time be allowed to withold their own? for some reasonn EVERY other bill i have accepts this form of payment (including Virginmedia, who i've now switched to), yet Sky feels the need to add some sort of exception. why am i obligated to provide all of MY details when they can openly refuse to provide theirs?

 

also -- seeing as they are threatening me with legal action -- should it even matter how they receive their money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

amazing. you've logged over 7500 posts here and that's the best answer you can come up with? good job.

 

I feel your post is quite unfair. Members here give their time freely so it most certainly isn't 'a job' Ida has given advice. It is up to you whether you take it or not

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry if i came across wrongly. i just dont see the point of a forum if f all problems are resolved via kiss-assery and any mention of white white knights.

 

i ask the questions i do because i NEED to -- not because i HAVE to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you did a google search you can find all the details of mking BACS payments to SKY, yes its for business, but why can;t you use the same process for private customers, if you read the first line of their instructions it says to FAX in a remit with your account number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now, don't bite my head off as its early in the morning and I have been known to breathe fire at this time of day.....

 

.....how about going online to the Sky site, and paying your account that way? Or rather, gettng your friend to do it? Bill paid, job done, goodbye Sky. My mum paid a bill to Sky for me in this way some time ago, it didn't matter that her card details were in a different name to the account holder, they took the dosh and that was the end of it. After they had argued the toss with me on the phone about using her card to clear the account in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the person making the payment is an 86 year old woman that doesn't speak any english. debit card payments are out of the question. it HAS to be a bank transfer or the bill isn't getting paid.

 

@topcat: the business account can't be used for private customers. i asked sky about this and it is a different account. they're simply refusing to give me their account info. i had a direct debit set up with them when i was a customer, so i have now had to resort to my bank to see where the money was going. it's rediculous that i would have to take such measures just to be allowed to pay a bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have to accept sometimes the answer is no to something we might want to do.

 

Wether a response is what we want to hear or not, should not lower a poster to get personal with someone who is offering free help. I find that very rude.

 

Never know a court judgement might accept a BACS payment, who knows, but sky not accepting it wont be a defence to non payment by a companies prefered choice.

 

Surely family member could transfer to your bank account and then you pay it by an accepted means.

 

If no help, well I give up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was pretty upset. IdaInFife -- you have my sincere apologies for being so rude. this damn sky thing has got me all befuzzled. i meant no offense. well... i did, but i didn't mean it. =D

 

i do rely on this site for a lot of questions so i hope i didn't ruin things by getting snappy.

 

@watchinginvestigation2010:

 

the person paying will not transfer the money into my own account for personal reasons -- she's only willing to pay the company directly.

Edited by TriP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your a little stuck then, sorry.

 

Have you thought of offering a token payment to sky on a montly basis till you can get the funds. If you pay such a payment it is looked apon better by the courts. Also if sky take you to court when paying a regular payment you can afford, then a court will not look kindly on them. If the worst comes to the worst and court it is, they will only make you pay what you can afford and then that will be through the court directly monthly and you will not then have to deal with sky again as long as pay regulary.

 

Hope you get sorted one way or other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If ou have a bill from Sky then you probbaly have their bank accounts details as they will be on the 'Bank iro Credit' at the bottom of the bill. I don't subscribe to Sky so I can't confirm this but certainly most of the blls I have received from other companies have this information on them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

As of June 2013, Sky UK's bank details are as below. Remember to include your account details if you are paying through online banking. The details are as supplied on the giro payment slip provided by Sky.

 

Sky Subscribers Services Ltd

Royal Bank of Scotland

Address: St. Andrews Square

Edinburgh

EH2 2YB

 

Sort Code: 83:06:08

Account Number: 10567117

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...