Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dismissed after ten years for first minor offence


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4515 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I worked at a famous boarding school for ten years without a blemish on my record. Last year a new deputy head started picking on me and the head supported him, even intimating that I had abused a child. I was so distressed about the constant battering about my competency that I finally broke down and took six weeks off because of stress. On my return they refused to allow me to teach my classes humiliating me in front of the students, telling the students I was not capable of teaching them. Some of the students accompanied by their paying parents insisted I be allowed to resume teaching their children; which was allowed. The group got 1xA*, 4xA, 4xB, 3xC and 1xD (a U was expected and parents warned of this by the deputy head). In June I successfully got the school to hear my complaint about bullying and got an apology from the Head with a written confirmation that I was not accused of child abuse.

In September I returned to a timetable that had 1/3 more lessons and contact time than any other teacher. I asked why and was told that was what the Head wanted. On Fridays I was made to work from 8am until 9pm without a break - I was advised to bring sandwiches by a senior manager. On September 22nd I was called into the Head's office and told there had been complaints about my teaching and a number of other things. I was advised to speak to the students to try and resolve issues brought about by the group that had been told I was useless the previous year. After an hour and a half of being harangued I had to go and teach the same class, without time for lunch or even a drink. I was upset. I laid out the causes for concern, asked what they wanted me to do about them, and started to teach. I admit I was upset, but I know I did or said nothing that was in any way bad. A student complained, I was suspended, investigated for gross misconduct and summarily dismissed last week.

I am appealing. What do you think I should take to the hearing?

Should I take documentary evidence that proves bullying over the year that may have contributed to my acting out of character during that one lesson?

Should I get letters of support from past students?

The union were useless and said that because the school had carried out the investigation and procedures according to ACAS guidelines there was nothing I could do.

I don't care if I never set foot in that school again, but I want to continue teaching and can't with dismissed on my CV.

Help.

Sorry for the long thread.

Edited by Teacher Annie
spelling!
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is really dreadful treatment and I find it truly awful that you've been put through this.

 

Something doesn't sound right and I would not take the union reps response as final at all.

 

You have nothing to lose by going to ACAS and even seeing if there is a solicitor who can help you with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank's for your kind words. Every one I have spoken to thinks this is appalling, but somehow they seem to be able to get away with it.

By the way they are A level results I have given.

Appeal and onwards I suppose.

The union is rubbish and failed to submit all sorts of evidence in my defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Annie - this may be not just one for ACAS but also one for a solicitor who specialises in these matters.

 

It's not just the dismissal as you say, it's the way they've blackened your character in order to achieve the dismissal.

 

If you can, also try and find people who will give you moral support as it's not just about being dismissed.

 

I hope you can get the right help and a satisfactory resolution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a bit confused by something in your post. You said that you know that you neither said nor did anything wrong. But later you said that the alleged bullying may have contributed to your acting out of character in that one lesson. Which is it - you did nothing, or you did something that was out of character? What were you dismissed for doing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was dismissed for:

Unprofessional behaviour by discussing a 'private conversation with the Head', even though he told me to go and discuss the points raised with the students.

I did not say anything during the lesson that could have caused offence, however I was upset and perhaps the student was unhappy about the way I discussed the points raised. The most ridiculous thing was the Head creating a massive fuss about the fact I give additional revision lessons in my own home during the holidays to A level students. All students are invited and some stay for the week because the they have nowhere else to go. This arrangement has operated for eight years with the permission of the head and parents/guardians. The student concerned said she had not been invited and felt left out, but as I pointed out the sessions are for A2 students not AS students as she was at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness statements were taken by the bursar who was designated investigating officer. She asked the class a series of questions about events leading up to the day of the complaint and what happened during the lesson. The questions asked and the answers given are quite different to those outlined in the dismissal outcome. The statements were taken after the students were put together in a classroom with the deputy head who bullied me, and told the same students I was a useless teacher. None of the statements were signed after being printed and none of the statements were read again by the students following the dictation of the statements to the bursar. The statements centred on my refusal to purchase out of date text books, prefering to keep students up to date with topical and accurate information and reference to websites. This was deemed my discussing the school's financial affairs with the students by the disciplinary committee. The rest of the statements concentrated on the students not wanting me to teach them because this year is so important for them and they "do not want her messing about", a reference to my taking time off work with stress. One student who was present on the day, was so distressed by the accusations against me he refused to give a statement and answer the questions, with his father complaining to the school.

The question of purchasing and issuing text books, which is what the focus of the complaint was originally was not given as a reason for dismissal, however my giving extra revision sessions was.

The dismissal letter states that decision was made solely about discussing with students a private conversation between myself and the headmaster, the state of the school finances, giving revision sessions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Annie

 

I hope you are feeling less stressed. I think you are doing the right thing by appealing the judgement. You have to comply with these procedures in any event to ensure that you can access benefits in due course. Fighting for justice is a long hard road and you have to steel yourself to the task, which could take many months if not years in some cases. We know that unions don't like taking on bullying cases but sometimes it is only as bad as the rep you have. How did you get represented, is it someone from the union HQ or a local rep in the school? Perhaps you need to talk directly with someone that has more clout?

 

If you have not done so already, you need to sit down and write out a contemporaneous account of everything that has happened to you and what you did and said in response. Try and keep a diary of events from now on in and get any other evidence that you can eg letters documents.

 

You said "Last year a new deputy head started picking on me and the head supported him" This is very common, a new manager comes in and starts to change things. What struck me was that this was done with the Head's approval, so actually what has happened is that the Head has discussed problems and instructed the Deputy to do what he did. So bearing in mind that you have been there 10 years what else has happened that may be relevant for the Head to consider you to be a problem in that 10 years? It could be anything including sickness, attitude, being disrespectful etc etc. Is there anything else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit that I am perplexed that this has gone so far on the basis of what you say. If you were supposed to resolve these matters with the students which the head raised with you, how were you supposed to do that without any reference to how you knew about their complaints? I could accept, very possibly, that discussing school fiinances with students may be wrong, but I can't see it as a dismissable offence unless you went overboard - if all you said was that you didn't think it was sensible to rely on out of date text books and you wanted to use more recent material - how is that discussing school finances?

Link to post
Share on other sites

SarEl... sounds like the school is in financial difficulties if they are resorting to out of date text books. I can see it as a very tricky subject to bring to the attention of paying clients as an exodus of pupils and their fees could result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice on gathering evidence. I have kept a log of all incidents, since the first episode of bullying and nit picking. I have a dossier of emails and letters etc which when read are quite alarming and demonstrate a consistant drip, drip of picking on me. The official letters from the Head in reply to questions I have asked him are so inconsistant they are laughable. During an OFSTED inspection my department and my teaching was graded as outstanding, a fact acknowledged by the Head in a letter to me dated 9th December 2009 and accompanied by the ofsted report which singled out only 4 departments, mine being one of them. We broke up for Christmas the following day. On our return on Jan 5th 2010 I was told I was to be investigated, observed and students questioned about me because of my poor teaching. I have the respect of my fellow colleagues not only for my teaching, commented upon by their tutees, but also for the dedication and hard work I have put into the school. One of the senior managers has written me a reference that is fantastic and reflects my contributions to the school. So have I done something to put the head's back up. Yes! Disrespectful of the head never, of the deputy head? perhaps. When someone tells me I should be showing them more respect because of their title it brings out the worst in me. But I hasten add only in private!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because of the rapidly changing economic climate and a change in syllabus there are no up to date text books available for this course. The latest edition of the text book I have been using for years refers to the Celtic Tiger economy of Ireland. China as an emerging economy and India as an economy that lies in the shadows. I told the students that I was waiting for the release of ebooks which are automatically updated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" So have I done something to put the head's back up. Yes! Disrespectful of the head never, of the deputy head? perhaps."

 

So I am guessing you have been a thorn in the Head's side for many years? And now they are pulling all the stops out to get rid of you. There must be a procedure to complain about this to the school's board. The Head is only there because he / she has been appointed. This may be an up hill struggle but have you considered a grievance about the Head to the Board?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what started the whole thing. I complained to the Chair of Governors about the deputy head's bullying and the head's complicity. They were made to write a letter of apology. The Head has only been in situ 2 years and his deputy 18 months.

The Chair of Governors is putting together 3 Governors to hear my appeal. He and I have always had an excellent working relationship and he has seen me teach on many occassions, but I suppose they will have to support the head they appointed. I taught the children of two more governors who got higher than expected grades at A level under my tutilage, enabling them to go on to Oxford and Med school.

I don't know whether to go to the appeal on my own or take a friend who is a past parent and barrister. I won't take the union rep as he threatened the governor outside the room at our last meeting . I don't want to antagonise them at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Normally there are Policies that are in place to cover these situations. Each company is different it may be in a handbook / manual. In any event it should be grieved about especially if you have so much evidence."

 

You're right. They wrote it after I complained about bullying.

Edited by Teacher Annie
To add quote from qestion
Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a friend. These occasions are always stressful and it is better to have an independent person there. If they are legally trained all the better. I know this has not been raised before so may not be relevant but these problems normally have some sort of start point / event can you identify any one event. Is there any possibility of discrimination eg sex discrimination being an issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this has not been raised before so may not be relevant but these problems normally have some sort of start point / event can you identify any one event. Is there any possibility of discrimination eg sex discrimination being an issue?

 

Unfortunately the Head is very weak and has annoyed the teaching staff by not answering questions. In fact when asked a question he gives the reply he thinks you want to hear and then says something totally different to his deputy. The more senior members of staff and I was one of them pointed out these annomolies in emails. The second master at at the school for over 20 years has been forced to resign to preserve his reference and is now working in Australia. Five other heads of Department are urgently seeking new jobs and not one of them knows of my situation. They have been lead to believe I am off sick!!

On the point of discrimination the fact that I was summarily dismissed for one incident that still is a mystery to me, I can give three instances of men being allowed to resign with references for far more serious incidents (including subsequent jailing), when I have been dismissed without the option. However I do know the ruling on dismissal for gross misconduct where precedence accounts for little.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit that I am perplexed that this has gone so far on the basis of what you say. If you were supposed to resolve these matters with the students which the head raised with you, how were you supposed to do that without any reference to how you knew about their complaints? I could accept, very possibly, that discussing school fiinances with students may be wrong, but I can't see it as a dismissable offence unless you went overboard - if all you said was that you didn't think it was sensible to rely on out of date text books and you wanted to use more recent material - how is that discussing school finances?

 

You tell me! I certainly didn't go overboard. In fact I asked the students if they would like me to purchase available text books on their behalf, but gave them a warning about the fact they would be out of date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not legally trained Annie but it strikes me that if during the tenure of this Head 3 male colleagues have been allowed to resign and you have been sacked for something less serious then Sex Discrimination may be on the table. Have a look at the Equality Act 2010 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/part/2/chapter/2

 

Private Schools (and I am sure you are aware of this) fear publicity more than anything. A huge turn over of staff is a dead giveaway that it has problems. Take legal advice but raising the spectre of Sex Discrimination may be something that will work, even if it does not end up in a Tribunal as such raising it as a grievance so it is considered could open up a charge of Victimisation especially if the Appeal upholds your dismissal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a friend. These occasions are always stressful and it is better to have an independent person there. If they are legally trained all the better. I know this has not been raised before so may not be relevant but these problems normally have some sort of start point / event can you identify any one event. Is there any possibility of discrimination eg sex discrimination being an issue?

 

If it is allowed - the law does not permit this, and they can refuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Sounds like another bad union who just want your money. I had similar with UNISON in a school please do not join them. It is an easy case to win if they do not follow the rules from ACAS anything else there legal team are not interested too much work for no reward for them. Have you noticed that most of the unions all use the same legal team Thompsons.

 

What you are describing does come under Gross Misconduct only Misconduct which should be a written warning. I would go to ACAS and get a deal compromise agreement. You should have been provided with paperwork which states what gross misconduct is in the school with examples. Violence, racial abuse, theft etc

 

Fight them all the way and please no one join unions that will hurt them and then maybe they will look after their members.

Edited by batfink99
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...