Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2 foot of sea level rise   The Thwaites Glacier — dubbed the “Doomsday” glacier because of the grave impacts for global sea level rise if it melts — is breaking down “much faster” than expected, according to a peer-reviewed study published on Monday in the academic journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using satellite imagery, scientists determined that widespread contact between the glacier and warm ocean water is speeding up the melting process. The climate crisis is interrupting natural processes across large parts of the continent, according to the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition. The glacier, roughly the size of the United Kingdom, could cause global sea levels to rise more than two feet if it melts completely, according to the study. “Thwaites is the most unstable place in the Antarctic and contains the equivalent of 60 centimeters of sea level rise,” study co-author Christine Dow said in a statement. “The worry is that we are underestimating the speed that the glacier is changing, which would be devastating for coastal communities around the world,” she continued. Read the full story here.       or here ... from the India civil service currents affairs exam Doomsday glacier Antarctica‘s Thwaites Glacier, roughly the size of Britain, is a fast-moving glacier in West Antarctica. Because of the risk it faces — and poses — Thwaites is often called the Doomsday Glacier. Because of its size (1.9 lakh square km), it contains enough water to raise the sea level by more than half a metre. Thwaites’s melting already contributes 4% to global sea level rise each year. Thwaites are important for Antarctica as it slows the ice behind it from freely flowing into the ocean. Credits: BBC Vigorous melting Salty and relatively warm ocean water is infiltrating beneath Thwaites Glacier, leading to significantly speedy melting. This process, termed as “vigorous melting“, is eroding its stability. However, its potential collapse could lead to a staggering 10-foot rise in sea levels, posing a dire threat to coastal communities worldwide. Previous studies discovered a deep connection to the east through which deep water flows from Pine Island Bay. That study also attributed the melting to the heat transport caused by channels bringing warm water towards the glacier from the north. With melting, glaciers become light and float off the land where they used to be situated. The resulting retreating grounding line exposes more of a glacier’s base to seawater, increasing the risk of melting. Since the late 1990s, the glacier has seen a 14km retreat of its “grounding line.” The grounding line is the point where the ice flowing off the land and along the seabed floats up to form a huge platform.   https://www.pmfias.com/current-affairs-for-upsc-civil-services-exam-may-28-2024/   or here Satellite data reveals Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is melting faster than we thought | Space WWW.SPACE.COM Seawater rushing miles beneath the glacier makes the ice more vulnerable to melting.  
    • I have notified all parties and will start a new thread.
    • The messaging app's boss has taken to social media to deny Mr Musk's claim it "exports user data."View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax bailiff visit: have i been ripped off?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4881 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is my first post on here. We fell behind on our council tax payments last year, and it was sent to court. i phoned the council and agreed to pay £130 a month for the rest of the couuncil tax period. On friday, I had a knock on the door, and it was a bailiff come to speak to my hysband and I about our council tas arrears. I told him that i pay it by BACS £132 every month. He telephoned his office and was told that the BACS had been cancelled because decembers payment had not gone through. (Obviously not enough money in my account to pay it). So he said lets have a chat about it, and came into the house. He asked us if we could pay the outstanding balance of £440.05, to which I replied no. He then told us that we could pay monthly but not by BACS because it had been stopped, and because of this he would have to do an inentory of our possessions incase we did not pay. I checked my bank balance and found that I could pay the balance off with my debit card on the day. So he then worked out our bill which came to 509.55 with charges. I gave him my card and he phoned the payment through. The payment was succesful, yet he still took down a list of our possessions in the living room (tv, xbox and wii). Did he need to do this since we had paid the full amount, and did we need to pay all those charges, since we cleared the bill? As far as I can understand form the copy of the notice of seizure
link3.gif
and inventory he gave me, we were charged £22.50 release fee, £36 for levy
link3.gif
fee, and £11 possession fee. Are these charges correct??

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, this is my first post on here. We fell behind on our council tax payments last year, and it was sent to court. i phoned the council and agreed to pay £130 a month for the rest of the couuncil tax period. On friday, I had a knock on the door, and it was a bailiff come to speak to my hysband and I about our council tas arrears. I told him that i pay it by BACS £132 every month. He telephoned his office and was told that the BACS had been cancelled because decembers payment had not gone through.

The bailiff cannot 'cancel' a BACS, only you, the account holder.

 

If you were already paying the arrears and you then receive a bailiff, you can disregard the fees under Section 1 of the Unsolicited Goods and Services Act 1971.

 

(Obviously not enough money in my account to pay it). So he said lets have a chat about it, and came into the house.

 

BIG mistake. Never let them in.

 

[He asked us if we could pay the outstanding balance of £440.05, to which I replied no. He then told us that we could pay monthly but not by BACS because it had been stopped, and because of this he would have to do an inentory of our possessions incase we did not pay. I checked my bank balance and found that I could pay the balance off with my debit card on the day. So he then worked out our bill which came to 509.55 with charges.

 

The amouint payable is the outstanding liability plus £24.50 (if genuine)

 

[i gave him my card and he phoned the payment through. The payment was succesful, yet he still took down a list of our possessions in the living room (tv, xbox and wii). Did he need to do this since we had paid the full amount, and did we need to pay all those charges, since we cleared the bill?

 

Correct, the work wasnt required because Section 45(3) of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 says:

 

(3) If, before any goods are seized, the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount and the levy shall not be proceeded with.

 

Source:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/613/regulation/45/made

 

You need to claim a refund from the council. If you are fobbed off with "contact the bailiffs" then speak to your local councillor, and if no joy then contact the Local Government Ombudsman siting the folowing case law:

 

JBW Enforcement Ltd v City of Westminster [2009] EWHC 2697 (QB), the Judge, Mr Justice Jack said:

 

Thus the bailiff gets paid only through the process of execution: if he becomes entitled to charge fees, but does not continue with the execution process, he will not recover them and he cannot sue the debtor for them.

 

Source:
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/2697.html

 

 

 

 

[As far as I can understand form the copy of the notice of seizure
link3.gif
and inventory he gave me, we were charged £22.50 release fee, £36 for levy
link3.gif
fee, and £11 possession fee. Are these charges correct??

Thanks for your help

 

No they are not correct, he has made them up. The law sets the statutory bailiffs fees which, in our case is £24.50 but you sould reclaim it because payments were already in progress

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, and the info. If I was to cancel the card payment, and then pay the council direct, because I signed that document would they have the right to come into my home and take our possessions? Do I have the right to cancel the card payment now, or is it too late? And what charges would I have to pay to the bailiffs if I did this? Or is it easier to do as you suggested, and leave the payment go through, and then claim the charges back from the council?

 

Sorry for all the questions, but I am not very clued up on all this, and need all the help I can get!!:oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, and the info. If I was to cancel the card payment, and then pay the council direct,

 

You can try that if you want to, its easier if you can but different rules for credit cards. Credit cards: you can claim a refund via your bank as a chargeback because the bailiff made a false representation (bogus fees) to obtain a credit money transfer contrary to Section 54 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 because ciivil enforcement is a regulated activity (the Ministry of Justice is the Industry Regulator). The bank has a duty to make a refund under Section 75 of the Act.

 

because I signed that document would they have the right to come into my home and take our possessions?

 

Technically yes, but its unlikely, but that cannot do touch your goods in your absence. Khazanchi & Anor v Faircharm Investments Ltd & Ors [1998] EWCA Civ 471 : On 17 March 1998 Lord Justice Morritt in the High Court ruled that bailiffs having a Walking Possessions Agreement cannot remove anything whilst the debtor is absent unless it is pre-arranged by appointment and with an Order signed by a Judge. The Judge also said in his conclusion, However it should be noted that in cases such as these there may be a sanction pursuant to Section 1 of the Criminal Damage Act l971. In other cases the provisions of Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act may apply also.

 

Source: http://vlex.co.uk/vid/ur-judge-cox-52584219

 

 

Do I have the right to cancel the card payment now,

 

Yes.

 

or is it too late? And what charges would I have to pay to the bailiffs if I did this?

 

None,

 

The law : Section 43(3) of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 says: If, before any goods are seized, the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount and the levy shall not be proceeded with.

 

Source: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/613/regulation/45/made

 

Or is it easier to do as you suggested, and leave the payment go through, and then claim the charges back from the council?

 

Small claims track is very reliable and always name the council and bailiffs company as Joint defendants.

 

Bailiffs quickly pay before the trial date, They can least afford a CCJ againsdt their name and can end their credit license when it is due for renewal.

 

Sorry for all the questions, but I am not very clued up on all this, and need all the help I can get!!:oops:

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for your reply. I paid by debit card, if this makes any difference. If I was able to get my bank to stop the payment going through, and I then paid the council direct, would I owe the bailiffs anything? Say a first visit fee? And if so would they be able to take my possessions to cover that, even though the items listed would be worth way more than the fees?

 

Sorry to keep asking you questions all the time, but you are extremely helpful, and I definately need all the help I can get!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...