Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Odd one this, I recieved 2 notice's for the 18th and 19th April stating that I overstayed on Wigan Robin Retail Park. Permitted Minutes 180. They state I was there 355 minutes on the 18th and 388 minutes on the 19th. Both times I was there around 10 minutes getting my wife a brew from costa after dropping the kids off at school.  On both days I had passed through there a second time around 3pm, again to get a brew then left. Both notices have 2 images each, Entrance and exit.  This is the interesting bit. The Entrance images both timestamped actually clearly show I am exiting the retail park not entering it. And the exiting images they provided show me leaving the carpark after visiting a second time later in the day. In the attachments You'll see all 4 images show that I am exiting, none of them are of me entering. I understand most if not all that see this post won't know the area but if the look at the map link i gave you'll see the road I was on leading up to the main road. g24 ltd 1.pdfg24 ltd 1.pdf GoogleMap view of the road I am on in the entrance images I would have had dashcam footage but I since formatted the memory card. I tried recovery tools but I couldn't get the files back.  
    • An update: I just got another PCN. I get the feeling that someone in the residence is calling OPS, as it's dated for a few mins after I parked. I won't appeal of course. Interestingly, our cleaner was also parked but didn't get a PCN. I asked them why and apparently they're whitelisted. I did ask the MA if they could whitelist me and they said they couldn't. Clearly they decided not to tell the truth. Surely, this would resolve all of the issues entirely i.e. we'd keep non-residents from parking, whilst allowing for residents to park without issue? Also, could OPS now take me to court for both PCNs separately, or could it be one case?    
    • I was with sse broadband until Jun 2023 at which point without notifying me they passed me to origin broadband who I was unaware is my supplier now -  My broadband at home kept working and I was under the impression that sse are taking direct debit payments from my bank account and everything is fine because the Internet has continued to work.  To my horror I have just noticed that origin broadband has been sending me PDF bills for £39 a month and the email heading has been showing as just no reply so I thought it was junk and never bother to check it.  I have now noticed a bill every month and now I owe them some £350. I did instruct origin to supply me Internet and therfore don't feel responsible for this debt.  What are my rights and is it a legal debt considered I did not sign any agreements with them - their first contact with me tho was very clever back in July 2023 trying to lure me into an agreement however because I just saw that email now I'm not sure what to do because I owe them 400 pounds nearly supposedly at 39 per month.  Our agreement with sse was for 26 per month but they shut shop and passed us to origin without asking our consent.    The following is what origin email said back in July before they stated sending invoice every month for payment.    We hope you're enjoying your reliable phone and broadband with us. We're just letting you know your phone and broadband package will end on 30 Jun 2023. Thankfully, good things don't need to come to an end - read on to decide what you want to do next.   Below you'll find the details of your current package and some other great options to compare it to.   What can I do - shall I just pay the debt and cancel it and move elsewhere or is there any way I can fight this as they are more or less enforced upon us with out permission by sse who most Likly sold our accounts to them.    Any help greatly appreciated 
    • whyisthis - Oh bless ya, it's so easily done.  Not worth losing sleep over; listen to the guys here, they know their stuff.  They won't take you to court, they'd get laughed out of it x
    • Monk - you are an experienced and respected member of this forum. Surely you realise how vitally important it is to respect court deadlines. There was no lack of knowledge.  You knew the deadline date.  You calculated it yourself in post 5.  It was written on the claimform.  Defence deadlines are written on probably a thousand threads on the forum. Sorry, but if you're up for a legal fight you also have to be up for organising yourself properly. As for now - 1.  pay it within 30 days and the CCJ disappears, or 2.  don't pay, nothing "legal" will happen, but you'll have a CCJ for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Defaults after 6 years - what happens?


kevlo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2936 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you make a payment within a six year period you start the clock running again , once the six years are up , making a payment does not start the clock again - the debt is statute barredlink3.giflink3.gif for all time and therefore cannot be Legally challenged .

 

In law , a limitation period is not extended by contact , it is only extended by payment or by written and signed acknowledgement of the debt . Spoken acknowledgement is not sufficient .

 

Please note that in Scottish law it is Statute Barred after five years

 

Please bear this in mind if there are still monies owed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the quick reply:

1 - No payment has been made on the CC since September 2004. The default was placed by Cabot.

2 - I have had correspondence with Cabot, but have either deflected via Kerobo/KBCM/Connect or

have always written that I dispute there findings. This has been going on for 16 months.

3 - I sent a prove it/harassment letter to which they didn't answer with any facts. Only to inform me of my complaints rights.

I am fairly sure that they haven't anything that would qualify as an acknowledgement - but of course in my mind - if you reply to anything like this even with an s74 request it sounds like an acknowledgement. This is why you understand law and I am Clueless of Clacton!

 

The point I wish to clarify is:

1 - Should I send another 'prove it' letter and try for a response? This cost nothing and surely at some point they have to declare their hand?

2 - Or send an s.5 and leave the burden of proof with them and see if they come up with anything?

3 - Send an SAR which extends the time and gets closer to the date of default that THEY placed on my CR?

 

I hope I don't sound too stupid, but it does seem to look like very murky waters at times.

 

SSS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The information on the CSA file from the DCA is May 05.

 

 

To be honest seven , i wouldnt open a can of worms ,i would wait until the time above lapses ....thats what i would do !

 

However if you fancy the fight regardless ... then thats up to you

 

Whatever you decide ...goodluck

 

regards

 

rs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to the above. I have just been informed by a solicitor that section 5 is no longer enforced as it was repealed by the enterprise act of 2002. So regardless of default date is it still be statute barred.

 

Facts: Cabot have been contacting me for 17 months - Their original contact being 5 years after the official default date. I have circumvented dealing with them and believe I have not actually acknowledged the debt as stated earlier - but as ODC has said the niggling doubt surrounds Cabots default date on my Credit File.

 

But of course acknowledgment is a vague word. I have NOT made a payment in over 6 years that is a fact. If Section 5 is no longer enforced is it purely on a point of None Payment in 6 years, Contact in 6 years or Acknowledgment in 6 years?

 

Simply - Contact has been made by CABOT with the 6 year period In that time I have continued to dispute the debt. I have NOT paid to that account in over 6 years.

They have continued to pressure for 17 months, but have never gone the next step to take me to court - Why?

 

I don't mean to sound stupid, but I just want to make the right decision based on my situation. So what effect has the Enterprise Act had on s.5 and statute barred?

Edited by sevenhorsestakes
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had several Defaults on my credit file and sure as damn it a year or so before they were due to fall off ......along came the DCA`s

 

They tried to convince me to pay a small amount to acknowledge the debt or to offer me a Full and Final Settlement.....I vigorously ignored them all .

 

When they eventually all fell off amazingly the letters stopped !!

 

I was then inundated with offers of credit cards and loans , by the banks who wanted to be my friends again ....i was back in the land of the living :-D

 

I think they have nothing sss ...leave alone until the end of april...then check the CRA `s ...if its still there ...then you go to war !!!!:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi - I'm new to this forum thing so forgive me if I'm hijacking a thread - this was the most relevant one I could find!!

 

My husband and I and our three sons moved into my late grandmother's granny flat a year ago (boys in the only bedroom and us on a sofabed!) and we've started to save for a mortgage after renting for years. We recently checked our credit reports to see if we were likely to be successful in getting one.

 

When we viewed my husband's equifax report, it said that two of his accounts from 5 and a half years ago were Defaulted. They were both from the same bank, one was a current account and the other was a loan account. At the time, the bank said it'd be better for him to take out a loan to clear the overdraft of his current account (about £500) The entry on the credit report stated all these different amounts and none of them seemed to add up. He then rang the Bank, called in to the branch and was told he had to write a letter including details of his credit report to the bank's debt recovery section. When they received the letter, they rang and said they had to wait to receive copies of his bank statements from the time of the “default” so they could investigate further.

 

On receiving the bank statements, the agent was able to see that both the loan and current account my husband had had with the bank had been settled in full in December 2005 when they received a cheque for the full amount (albeit after a couple of missed payments). The agent apologised for this mistake and told us he would get in contact with Equifax straight away to clear the defaults. He did this promptly and when I checked the report on the Monday morning, the report had been updated, showing that the current account had been settled and the loan settled. However, the loan was still showing as in Default before it had been settled which didn’t change the credit score.

 

Is this defamation of character? I have no doubt we have been refused credit because of this. Our current bank won't even give us a small overdraft or debit card! Does anyone know if we have a case here? And, if so, what could we get from it? I don't even care about 'compensation' - all I want is a mortgage - the sofabed is killing my back!!

 

Any info would be brilliant - thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same with a loan years ago - I wrote a letter to the loan company asling them to change the report - which they did - You will definitely have to speak to the bank again and get them to change the information as it is their information. You should also check the other two Credit Reference Agencies - send £2 for a report. The report may not have been changed with them. I'm not much of an expert but hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

HI, I have a default which I am still paying. the date of the default is 19.5.10. It has been sold on several times. In May this year the default should disappear. If I am still paying it how does that reflect on my credit file? or can I just stop paying it. My credit file hasn't been updated on this debt since 12/15.

 

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, I have a default which I am still paying. the date of the default is 19.5.10. It has been sold on several times. In May this year the default should disappear. If I am still paying it how does that reflect on my credit file? or can I just stop paying it. My credit file hasn't been updated on this debt since 12/15.

 

 

thank you

thread is +5yrs old

best you start a new thread

of your own

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...