Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
    • Sorry my redactions made it harder dx. Tick dates are 11/12/2014
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • I agree
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Desira Gt Yarmouth.....


kevb0444
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What a dodgy main dealer. Avoid like the plague.

 

I took the GF's 53 Fiat Seicento there to have some warranty work and when i came to pick up the car the woman handed me the keys and as i was walking out she said "oh by the way....the handbreak cables snapped".

 

I was like WTF???? I said it was fine when I bought it in. She said she new and recommended that when I take it away, to leave it in gear when I park. She told me it would cost £200 to repair...

 

I said “hang on so you broke the cable and now I have to pay for it”. She said that she didn’t break it. It snapped when the mechanic put the hand break on. I asked if it was covered on my warranty and with out checking she told me it wasn’t. I asked what I was supposed to do and she said that she’ll book it in next week.

 

I asked to speak to the service manage and she asked him to come to reception. He walked in, all cocky, and with out even asking what the problem was he said “I’ll tell ya what. I’ll be generous and we’ll go 50/50 on it” He knew what to say before I even told him about the problem. I told him that wasn’t good enough and he said he could do no more. I asked him if I could have a courtesy car over the weekend and he told me I couldn’t as I hadn’t booked it in and they didn’t have any spare anyway.

 

I’d had enough at this point and handed him back the keys and told him I was going home to seek some legal advice. He wished me good luck so I told him I’d heard about garages like this before and he just smiled and told me he’d worked in loads like it.

 

I got home and called Trading Standards who were shocked to hear how a main dealer had acted so badly. They told me that as the cable broke whilst in there care then they have to repair it for free.

 

I phoned the Desira back and told them I’d spoken to Trading Standards. Told them that under the Supply of Goods Act they where liable to pay for the repair. I warned them that I would take the matter higher. After hearing all this the Service Manager put me on hold for a wile and then came back and told me they’d replace the cable for free. I asked about a courtesy car and was told I could have one as one was due back today and WAS free all weekend.

 

Anywhoo all was fine untill the exhaust went on the Seicento the other week. I thought.."should i run it past Desira to see if it's coverd on waranty" Anyways i ran it over there just to check, as the only other main dealer is 20 odd miles away. They told me it wouldn't be coverd...so i asked how much it would cost (so i'd have an idea) and was told £365!!!

 

I asked why it cost soooo much and was told that i needed a new Cat aswell and that the exhaust came as one complete system. I thought that can't be right and said i'd go to a local exhaust garage and was told if i had a 3rd party exhaust fitted it would void my warranty!!! I thought "fudge it..theres only a few weeks left on it anyways"

 

I ran the car elsewhere and was told it didn't need a new cat, just an exhuast system and that a new exhaust would cost £100. I booked in the car and gave the other Desira a phone call and asked them about the exhaust. I told them where it had gone and they told me it would only cost £175 and that it didn't need a new cat and that they couldn't understand why the Gt Yarmouth Desira wanted to fit one!!!!

 

I've also now heard some other horror storys about Desira in Gt Yarmouth...

 

They had sold someone a new car and when it arrived it had a dent the size of a tennis ball in one of the doors and they refused to replace the car (it had already been paid for) and offerd to fill the dent at (guess what!!!) 50/50...

 

They also sold a used car as "perfect condition with no bad history" only for the new owner to discover it had been in a smash and been filled, repaired and re-sprayed...

 

They had a new Punto in once and one of the front springs had snaped (faulty from the factory!!) and the resulting collaps of the front suspention buggerd up everything under it...but they only replaced the snapped spring for free and tryed to billed the poor sod for the rest of the work!!

 

I've now heard T.Standards are investigating them!!! So be warned peeps.....

NatWest:

**£466.28 Settled In Full 21/08/06**

Halifax:

**Full settlement of £107.52 offerd and accepted 25/10/06**

GE Money:

**£48 settled In Full 19/09/06**

Barclays Bank:

**Full settlement of £90 offered and accepted on 24/10/06**

Alliance & Leicester:

**£170 Refunded In Full 17/09/07 (Charges due to bank error but still had to fight them for almost 3 weeks to get back)**

 

"Thin-de le'hasuan 'aloun'myin-del bpi-de gka-de hasou-de paya"

"Learn the gifts of all sights, or finish in the dance of the fallen gods."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

Very poor experience with desira Yarmouth - bought secondhand there with promise of free service, tank of fuel etc. but was not carried out, book not stamped and so on. Complained in writing and received an envelope containing cheque, no letter, for 35. Got my garage to carry out service and won't go anywhere near Desira Yarmouth in this lifetime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...