Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unfair Treatment J


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got sent home from work as i would not do a job there that i was not trained for, they had bullied me for two weeks to do this job and in the end a acting manager sent me home saying (no pay for me this week) Have sent a letter of grievence to head office heard nothing for nearly two weeks and still no work. Dont know what to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worked for the company for 4yrs as Headhousekeeper, company was bought out by another company in August this year, job remained the same apart from doing reception dutys, we were supposed to be trained on the computer system and phones but had no training to do this, because i said i could not do the computer side they sent me home, saying no shifts for me and i would not get paid, i have written two letters on the 16/10/10 grievence letters but have had no contact since she sent me home on the 14/10/10

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a horible feeling that I am not going to like the answer to the next question - how many hours did your old contract say? And whenin August did your contract change? The exact date of the new contract please?

 

But that has nothing to do with your original question, and this is very simple. You cannot be suspended withour pay. It is unlawful. They cannot refuse you shifts - that is also unlawful. And if they chooe not to have you at work then they must pay you. That much is simple.

 

Now lets deal with the more complicated part (and depending on the answers to my questions above - this might be the second most complicated part!). In your first post you say that you were sent home because yu "would do do" (as in refused) the jpb you were asked to do - did you refuse or did you say that you couldn't do the work because you could not use the equipment? If you refused, then technically your employer could discipline you for this - and they can suspend you, but not without pay. This is not good, obviously. When you wrote to the employer, exactly what did you say - did you say that you had refused to do this job?

 

And it gets more complicated - the law says that you can refuse a request from an employer, but only if the request is ureasonable or unlawful. It obviously wasn't the latter - but may have been the former. Can you explain why you couldn't use the equipment - albeit you haven't been trained on it, most people can use a computer. So what made it impossible for you to "muddle along"?

 

And now, even more complicated (sorry - I am trying to work out some issues in law here!) - you say that the duties changed from being Head Housekeeper to being required to do reception work. This is an awfully big change in duties - did you get consulted about this and did you agree to it? It would help also if I knew what your employer does - Head Housekeeper can cover a multitude of sins from hotel work to Stately Home!

 

If you are worried about giving away too many details on line you may PM me the details. Just bear in mind that I am a lawyer and so I can't always get back to you immediately - I will always reply, but it may take some hours!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, old contract was for 20hrs, i signed a new contract with new company on the 03/09/10, they took over from the 10/08/10, i did try to muddle along,but i could not check people in or out of the hotel, also could not end my shift on the system,so i could not log out of there system. They have said they have not suspended me, they have not contacted me (i asked them) when they took over my first meeting with them they said it would be nice if i could do both housekeeping and reception with the right training, the training never came, and all of the staff i once employed have now given there notice in, training was never given i asked so many times to be trained but they just thought i could do it, i have also asked for head office and HRs telephone numbers no-one will give them to me. what is pm?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, old contract was for 20hrs, i signed a new contract with new company on the 03/09/10, they took over from the 10/08/10, i did try to muddle along,but i could not check people in or out of the hotel, also could not end my shift on the system,so i could not log out of there system. They have said they have not suspended me, they have not contacted me (i asked them) when they took over my first meeting with them they said it would be nice if i could do both housekeeping and reception with the right training, the training never came, and all of the staff i once employed have now given there notice in, training was never given i asked so many times to be trained but they just thought i could do it, i have also asked for head office and HRs telephone numbers no-one will give them to me. what is pm?

 

You need to see a solicitor tomorrow. If not sooner. The new employer could not change your contractual hours - you should have been protected by TUPE, but you are within days of loosing a right to claim. Explain everything that you have told me here - this sounds very like it is an unfair dismissal arising from a TUPE transfer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much, i will contact my solicitor tomorrow morning, and i will let you know what happens,i was supposed to be covered by tupe, it all went through with tupe, i will let you know as soon as i know, thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...