Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1 Date of the infringement 29th May 2023 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 2nd June 2023 PDF scan done Redacted and Attached 3 Date received 8th June 2023 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No, not directly but has some wording about transfer to keeper 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes, Entry and Exit times 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Yes, Panicked thinking JustPark had not updated Alliance with payment details HOWEVER not revealed the driver id Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up I think so (very brief email, saying appeal failed, due to OVERSTAY of 17min) 7 Who is the parking company? Alliance Parking 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Harlyn Bay, Cornwall For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS   This PCN is similar to @Kahunaburger in that it was a bank holiday weekend and car park was rammed. It was a very hot day, and we were first time parkers in this car park (not knowing the Alliance ANPR Scam in play). We entered the car park looking for our friends who were 2 mins ahead of us. As the car park was in overspill mode there were 2 other fields open and after doing a circuit gave up looking and after a few more mins trying to find a space parked up on the grass at the top of the field. N.B. There were no signs anywhere near us. We had to unload the kids, dog and beach bags etc .. and most importantly water the dog as he was so hot. Then made our way across the fields to the parking machine. As it was so busy there was a big queue, so attempted to book with justpark (which took an age getting a signal). Eventually paying for 4 hours. Upon leaving we were notified by Justpark that our time was up so proceeded to make our way back to the car, and within 6min had left the car park. So it was 11min to make the booking on JustPark and 6min after our 4hr time was up.   On 5th May 2024 we got a Letter of Claim and decided to post up here .. As for next steps, we guess from others post on this forum we understand we need to write a "Snotty Letter" with a few key points. Has anyone got best advice? otherwise we'll cobble something together from others posts. AllianceParkingScam-NTK+LOC-Jun23.pdf  
    • The return to principles-based regulation? Eric Leenders on Consumer Duty, AI and the wider economyView the full article
    • Hi, New to the forums (but can see I will become active). I recenttly changed fixed line/broadband suppliers. They are not that cheaper than my incumbents were. However, I foudn out their service levels for technical support are woefully inadequate. Basically business hours Monday to Friday and Saturday morning. I had an issue where I lost all aserve (phone and broadband) on Sat eve and they did not pic up the ticket untiul this morning 9am (Monday), and they say between 24 and 48 hours before will get in touch. So, between 2.5 and 3.5 days I will be without service - add a day if this happened on a bank holiday weekend. I purchased it online from a reputable comparison/switch site, and there was nothing to indicate such poort SLAs, nor easily found on the web site of the provider. In fact, their out of hours recorded telephone message states that one can get support 24 hours on their website, which turns out to be their FAQs. I will go through ther T&Cs foresincally, however, assuming they contain the service level agreement (buried in there at section 10, it looks like), do I have any rights. I would like to void the contract without having to pay it out because they do not meet the standards one would (or shoudl) expect of a Telco without making it obvious before purchasing. I know there is a 14 day cooling off period, but, especially with the reliance on broadband (and the fact I live in a rural area, so the alternative of mobile boradband is not practical), there would be an obligation for the supplier to be very clear of the SLA?   I know I can try an OFCOM ombudsman, but would like to understand my legal standing before I try.   Kind regards, JA  
    • Because it's 5pm. My case is tomorrow morning. I'd be lucky if they take it now....so I'll probably still have to change it.... Here is that page that was missing.  If there is any other way I can help please let me know. Super grateful for the help I received! Do you know if I must send my Witness statement to the other party as well or just to the court? THanks! FIRST PAGE OF WITNESS STATEMENT.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Resource Solutions - pestering my mother.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4954 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I hope someone can help or shed some light on this.

 

For the last few weeks my mother has been receiving threatening text messages from a company called 'Credit Resource Solutions', demanding that she call 'Sarah' over an apparent debt, or they'll carry out 'action' or visit our home. They provide a reference number beginning with 'SWNT*******' but in several of the texts the last digit is different despite identical wording.

 

This worried her because only family and friends have her mobile number - she never lists it as a contact number for anything important - and she has debts, but all known ones are currently being paid or in the process of being resolved. There have been no letters, either - frankly I'd expect any real or reputable DCA to make contact via post rather than text.

 

So I did some checking, and CRS and these same messages are listed in several places as being a [problem].

 

Which was something I was more than happy to believe until they started ringing last week. My Mum won't answer calls from unknown numbers on her mobile, so when they last called I did. They demanded to speak to my mother, wouldn't give me any information when I said I was authorised to speak on her behalf, and said she needed to call them at CRS.

 

No calls since, and no response to my e-mails to them asking what this 'debt' was pertaining to, which still leads me to believe they're trying to pull off a [problem].

 

I'm asking for help here because today they sent a message to my Mum saying they would pass on her case to 'H L Legal' if she didn't call them immediately. I told her not to, as it still looks like a [problem], but it's beginning to seriously scare her - she's been ill recently and is stuck inside, and now terrified that someone will force entry and remove our belongings.

 

Is this anything we should be worried about? Or are they simply [problematic]?

 

Thank you for any help anyone can provide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Some more here about this '[problem]'.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?250695-Credit-Resource-Solutions-Possible-[problem]

 

However, and welcome BTW before I forget but I'd have no contact with them. You have read it could be a [problem], and from what I am reading it would seem like they are 'fishing' so the more contact you have, the more they will come back to you. I would leave it alone until you either have more in writing ie something solid and then, if necessary, come back here and post it. Until then, I would maybe just ignore them.

 

The next piece of advice: your mother is already doing the right thing by not answering their calls and I have to say using witheld numbers ... you can complain about this under the Misuse of Telecommunications Act and Protection from Harassment (I can't remember the exact Acts but they come under those) to someone like Consumer Direct.

 

If they are genuine that should quickly become obvious when they put something in writing. It's fairly common for a DCAs initial approach to be the phone. So, personally, I'd wait to see if they write but also complain to Consumer Direct for their aggressive approach using witheld numbers.

 

Edited - Oh, of course, the thing about witheld numbers is ... they could be anyone phoning, really, couldn't they? So, if it is a [problem] ...

Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
she's been ill recently and is stuck inside, and now terrified that someone will force entry and remove our belongings.

 

Hello guests before I continue with posting ... So who is going to force entry? HL Legal? Don't think so. You've already said you think it is a [problem] or have read it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

she's been ill recently and is stuck inside, and now terrified that someone will force entry and remove our belongings.

Is this anything we should be worried about?

 

Absolutely nothing to worry about, I know it is easier said than done but really, they cannot do anything.

As for anyone forcing entry and removing goods, the ONLY person that will do this is a THIEF, so if it happens then 999 is the only number you need.

CRS are a tin pot DCA and you MUST report them for their lousy childish efforts to intimidate your Mum.

Firstly complain about them to:http://www.csaconsumers-uk.com/page/i-have-a-complaint as they are members of the CSA.

 

You can have a look at their hilarious thoughts here http://www.creditresourcesolutions.co.uk/

 

Once you have finished laughing at them, because that is all they really are, ONE BIG JOKE, complain further to the OFT&TS via http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

 

Don't ring them ever, unless your confident in baiting them.

Just continue to ignore the fools, and file their letters, including the envelopes, under ignore.

If they ring, just hang up, or laugh then hang up, they really cannot do ANYTHING, they are NOT Bailiffs, they may like to threaten that they will do this and do that, but in reality, your postman has more legal rights and know how than this outfit.

The ONLY people who CAN take legal action is the Original Creditor (OC) or the person who legally owns the alleged debt. And for bailiffs to be used, they first have to take you to court, they then have to obtain a CCJ, you then have to fail to pay toward that CCJ, they then have to go back to court and apply to the Judge for COURT CERTIFIED BAILIFFS to attend the property, and even then you DO NOT have to let them in.

 

As you can see, there is an awful long time before they can actually do what they think they can, tell your Mum not to worry especially where these chancers are concerned!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

I'd certainly be glad to phone the police if any of these muppets showed up on my doorstep. I'd be more than obliging. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...