Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tradewise Car Trade Insurance - Wont Pay Help!


nickyb2010
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4239 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Mother has a Fully Comp Trade policy with Tradewise. I am a named driver on the policy as I sometime drive cars for her. Around a month ago a man came to view a car and during the process of the viewing he asked to hear the engine whilst it was running he simply drove away and stole the car. We reported this to the police straight away and the Insurance also. Trade wise have finally responded to say that they will not be paying anything towards this claim because if we refer to the insurance manual they don't cover for theft from intended purchase. I know there might not be much that we can do as it is written in black and white but if you can help in anyway that would be great thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi nicky

 

I think you need to put your case to them in writing, for the time being put aside what it says in the manual. See if the same exculsion applies to policies from other Insurance companies. When you allow someone to look at your car, you don't know there going to steal it, a theft is a theft. A bit of a sham policy.

If you didn't think it was unjust you wouldn't be here, so lets see what happens. The next complaint is to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Send the letters recorded.

 

http://www.biba.org.uk/ComplaintsandTracing.aspx

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/contact/index.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All thanks for the quick response, I will get onto writing a letter ASAP. I have included a photo of the claim in their letter and the ref section in the manual. One of the stipulations they have included in their letter is worded differently in the manual, very badly in fact because they have missed the end of the sentence so it doesn’t actually mean anything it isn’t included on the following page either. The other stipulation is that they use the words "deception by a purported purchaser or agent " they have no definition of the words deception in there definitions section however I don’t believe there was any deception, the person simply stole the vehicle? I don’t know if these arguments would hold any water but just things that I thought of when I immediately noticed it

photo.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go to the FOS now, start this moving. This could go either way, there wil be a lot of factors to look into, i.e. you say the engine was running, how did they see ? where was your mother, within a distance to stop the thief or 50 yards away.

Be prepared for a wait, also be prepared for possible dissapointment (sorry).

To your advantage, Tradewise are a pretty new set up, their wording may let them down compared o others out there.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Tradewise will do ANYTHING to avoid paying out. We lost our car transporter due to theft and i took our claim to the ombusman, They ruled against us on the grounds that we never declared to tradewise that we had a car transporter. We told our broker Unicom, who are a sister company and share the same office building as Tradewise,But as Unicom failed to pass on this info,WE the paying public get shafted.

AVOID TRADEWISE AT ALL COSTS. YOUR COVER IS NOT WORTH THE PAPER ITS PRINTED ON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...