Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see below for an extract from the letter more about my case.    You have been convicted of two matters of failing to give driver details linked to two speeding offences and been disqualified in your absence. You confirmed that you did not receive the court documentation and the first you knew about the cases was on 3/6/24. As you can make a statutory declaration it is possible that we will be able to persuade the police to accept pleas to either or both of the speeding offences as they were committed within a very short space of time and withdraw the two fail to give driver details offences as normally if you plead to one or other of the speeding or fail to give driver details the prosecution will withdraw the other related offence. If successful you would not face a totting ban. In respect of the speeding offences, it could be argued they were committed on one occasion due to the proximity of the time and location and we may be able to persuade the prosecution to drop one of the speeding offences. You are technically guilty of all the offences because you accept it was you driving when the speeding offences were committed and that you did not update your change of address with the leasing company when it was your responsibility. If the prosecution will not withdraw the two failures to give driver details offences, you will face a totting ban but will be able to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. This may or may not go ahead at the court hearing date, so we need to prepare for all eventualities. As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge. The court have dealt with the matter very quickly and have actually listed your matter for an application to suspend the disqualification pending appeal on the above-mentioned date. We could actually use this date to make the statutory declaration in court having explained the situation to the magistrates and then see if the prosecution will agree to accept pleas to one or both of the speeding offences as a way of resolving the matter without the need for you to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. It is possible the case would need to be adjourned so that we can make those representations, or the court may want to go ahead and hear the exceptional hardship argument. The outcome of your case is always at the discretion of the Court.  
    • Hi,    I will look over your case shortly.   I am sorry for the delay.
    • Judges are now loaded and they are both deputies 😕
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA when loan paid off by overdraft?


Leolemon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4965 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm booked in to see a solicitor but I'd welcome any of your thoughts as it will help me prepare good questions.

 

In 2001 the bank paid off one of two defaulted loans by using an overdraft account. This was done on the same day all the accounts were closed and shipped off to a debt collector.

 

Therefore the single balance they pursue is made up of the second loan and an overdaft (an overdraft inflated by paying off the first loan). I hope that makes sense.

 

I would like to see a copy of the agreement for the loan which they paid off using my overdraft just before the accounts were closed. Is the 'overdraft' part of the balance covered by a CCA request?

 

I do understand that overdrafts have some exemption but this overdraft was used to pay off a loan - the banks decision.

 

It would be a good loophole I guess if banks could pay off loans by using overdrafts then pursue you for the overdraft which enjoy slightly less legal standing than the loan?

 

I've made several requests for copies of all agreements over the years and they've admitted to not having any.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot CCA your overdraft.. But you must send a SAR. you must also request a copy of your overdraft agreement.

 

Inorder to take a payment from your current account to pay off the loan without your consent, there must exist an agreement that allows them to do this. As they have admitted that they cannot provide an agreement which entitled them to do this, challenge any claim.

Get the statements. This will show how the overdraft was created. Without an agreement showing you owed the loan, demand that the account be credited. Remember, all correspondence can be submitted with your defence, if/when they instigate legal proceedings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debbbsy, thanks for taking the time to reply.

So it's your understanding that I can request a copy of the overdraft agreement?

 

I do have closing statments of account. That's what they have always sent me when I've requested copy agreements in the past. The statements show the last few weeks of transactions between current and loan accounts, including the transfer - or offset as I understand it - the bank made to pay off the loan account.

They have no copies of anything else, and have pursued me for an amount based on the closing statements only. They don't even know how much they claim I original borrowed in the first place because there's no records.

I've just resent a SAR and CCA request - sent the last one last year and no copies of agreements. They are trying to put together a reconstituted version this time and have delayed the request. I don't know how they will do this if the original amount of loans is not known.

Anyway, thanks for your help, it's preparing me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am too having same with Barclays so can either advise what letter I send to Wescot is it the CCA request or a SAR? and what template do i use for that request please? any help appreciated

Send Wesclots this; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?428-General-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt and make them prove a debt exists and they have the right to collect.

 

Send the bank a SAR to see what unfair charges PPI etc you can reclaim, also it should throw up some interesting facts as to whether the O/D is now fully covered by CCA 1974 because they've paid the cc with an overdraft and thus created a loan. ;)http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?417-A-Subject-Access-Request-for

Link to post
Share on other sites

The overdraft would generally be enforceable, the credit cards would not.

This looks like a cynical attempt to make unenforceable credit cards enforceable

 

They will claim the haev a right to offset. This does not include increasing an overdraft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I'm confused here. I don't understand why credit cards are being mentioned?

I started the thread with a question relating to a loan paid off by an overdraft when the accounts were closed and sent to the debt collector. The banks decision and not mine. I had no idea until ten years later that they even did that the day the account was closed - I always assumed the amount was for the loan, not an overdraft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes,

I sent the letter you had listed on that message and got reply sometime last week saying it had been requested from Bank and then saturday to say they had contacted bank and as its a bank account they dont have to send any agreement and im to send the money NOW!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't have to send an agreement for an overdraft but they do have to provide proof not only of the debt but also that they have the right to collect it.

 

Have you sent the bank a SAR so that you can get to the bottom of this? Because technically they have converted the overdraft into a personal loan as well by paying the original loan off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I sent off the SAR request and have yesterday recieved statements from Barclays. I have taken account of a payment made to RAC (of which I had cancelled before I moved so I have been on phone to them this morning to challange why anyone would want or pay for duplicate covers) They claim they may not be able to refund as its past the 14th day of cancellation but I won't be leaving it there as this too has incurred charges at the bank. I also have two payments for my Barclaycard which they have taken after I said I couldn't afford to pay and then numerous 'RESERVE FEES'???? which the reserve fee's total over 100 pounds.

I am not unsure as to what to do with this information in regards to contacting wescott again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter today from wescott saying that as it is a bank account (overdraftlink3.gif) they don't have to issue me with anything

 

This is quite simply a lie. The most probable reason for this response is that they have requested documents from the OC, who have admitted they don't have anything. With nothing to prove you owe the money, they make it up as they go along.

 

They must provide a copy of your current account application (to prove you opened the account), information about your overdraft,and the agreed credit limit.

You must CCA the OC for a copy of the Loan. It must contain a clause that legally allows them to pay it from monies in you current account. Even if the clause exists, before terminating the account, they would have to issue the correct paperwork, & follow lawful procedures,any deviation from this allows you to challenge them. Request officially all the documents they should have issued.

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Debs.

The information sent from the Bank is issued from 2008. I opened the account in 2006 so no statments before 2008 have been sent to me and nor has my application to open the account nor any aggrement ir overdraft etc? Shall I write back to Wescott and say that until you provide me with a copy of my account application from the bank I am not paying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...