Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Just started a PPI claim...Natwest/RBS Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

let the fos sort it out.

 

they can play what games they like, but once the FOS have gotten their teeth in them it's get all sorted.

 

prob still trying to buff you off with crap.

 

if its not in the agreement nor the T&C that that is the way it works, then they can't do that.

 

little fleecers..

 

 

however, just remember though, if the PPI was higher payments at the start then slowly reduced...it might play in your favour as it'll be a greater figure for the 8% over a greater time.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hey all, this is dead and buried yet. Its been 31 weeks since I registered my complaint originally with Natwest/RBS. I had a call today from the FOS Adjudicator that has been assigned my case and she advised me that her ruling is to uphold my claim and she has sent a letter to Natwest but needs to give them until the 25th April to reply. The only downside is that she informed me that due to the current court cases going on (she mentioned something about the banks not being happy with the FOS's ruling) that it may be they dispute and refuse to uphold my claim. If this happens it will have to go through to the FOS's Final Decision process in which the Ombudsman will rule on the matter, they may disagree with her ruling and decide not to uphold it but if they do, Natwest will have to pay out. Unfortunately this process is currently taking 12-18 months.

 

Anyway, its a small glimmer of hope, fingers crossed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all, it seems when I phoned up last year to have the PPI stopped on both my Natwest Credit Card and my Loan they raised 2 PPI complaints for me even though I only asked for the Loan to be disputed. Got an out of the blue letter yesterday offering me £2513 which they have calculated from 2002 till now. Surprised is not the word! That more than pays the balance on that card.

 

The FOS have been keeping me "on hold" regarding my loan complain but I called RBS direct earlier and they say the hold up is with the FOS processing correspondence due to the volume of claims. Upside is they have confirmed they have accepted my dispute as per the FOS's ruling and will be offering me the full amount of PPI I paid, plus associated interest, plus the 8% standard on top. I am over the moon, I dont know what the compound interest is going to amount to as they have never given me details of this "sliding scale" they mentioned of how they took the PPI payments but what i do know is, that at the very least I have paid them £7008 in PPI payments without accounting for interest.

 

Its taken 11 months but its been worth the persistence. I cant thank you guys enough for the help and comments :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Well this is now finally over and done with, ended up with nearly £14,000 but it's been a long road, good job I'm a patient man. What is annoying me is all the PPI companies out there trying to entice people, and making out as though its a difficult process to claim back, when in actual fact it's not difficult, just requires patience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...