Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claiming back PPI on Halifax loan from 2002 **WON FULL AMOUNT REFUNDED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3271 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Received this reply letter from the Halifax on Monday:

 

Dear Mr XXXXX

 

Further to your recent letter received 10 July 2013 in which you rejected our decision to not uphold your Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) policy complaint, I have reconsidered your complaint in light of the further information provided.

 

In an attempt to improve our understanding of your concerns we also tried to contact you by phone on the current numbers we how. However, we were unsuccessful. We have therefore reviewed your complaint based on our understanding of your initial contact.

 

On considering this information I do not believe that it introduces anything that changes the original decision and I am still unable to agree that the policy was mis-sold.

 

Having completed all of these steps, I went on to look at your complaint as a whole to ensure that we acted fairly towards you in relation to the sale of your PPI policy, giving appropriate weight and balanced consideration to all available evidence including any further information supplied by you.

 

Although your new information adds some useful further background I am still unable to agree that the policy was mis-sold.

 

As such, I am still unable to agree that your complaint should be upheld.

 

Findings

 

Eligibility

 

The evidence detailing your status at the time of the sales, when considered in conjunction with the eligibility criteria in your policy booklet confirms that at the time of the sale, you were eligible for the PPI policy you bought.

 

Suitability

 

In addition to the documentation noted above, I have looked back to consider you circumstances at the point of sale taking into account any additional information that has been supplied with your complaint. It should also be noted that I have considered all aspects of suitability and not just those raised by you in your complaint.

 

These can be summarized as follows:

 

  • Affordability

An affordability check confirms that you could meet the expense of your PPI policy in addition to your living expenses and other financial commitments;

 

If you should wish to contact me directly my details are at the top of this letter. If I do not hear from you I will close your complaint and consider it resolved.

 

When we issued our original decision we advised you of your right to refer your concerns to the Financial Ombudsman Services (FOS), and that you had six months from the date of that letter in which to do so. You are still within this timescale so you are within your rights to refer the complaint to the FOS. I have enclosed a leaflet which gives details of how you can get in touch with them.

 

Your sincerely.

 

 

Is there anything else I can do? Is it worth phoning the Halifax and asking them to explain why they have not addressed the points raised in the reject letter?

 

Really do feel at a loss now. It's like they haven't even read my reject letter :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

no I don't think they have

 

why not give the FOS a ring

 

I don't think its correct that they can just decide you should have had another type of policy.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did 'regular' policies even exist in 2002? And did Halifax offer them?

 

They say in their original letter that the adviser had no alternative policies to offer me, yet they believe I would have taken a regular policy had I been offered it??? Makes no sense!

 

Spoke to the FOS today who offered to open a complaint for me. I went back to Halifax via phone today and couldn't get past the call handler to speak to the PPI team....she eventually 'escalated' the call and apparently someone is going to call me back next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am so frustrated with Halifax!!

 

I've tried to call Halifax back several times on 0845 601 4034 and I can't get past the foreign call centre handler.

 

Has anyone got any advice on how I can actually speak to the Charter PPI team? They are refusing to put me through.

 

Regards

 

Danny

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well that was via a search engine

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries, thanks anyway.

 

I'm speaking to a supervisor now with a view to someone from the actual PPI investigations team to call me, but I have a feeling that this is just going to have to go down the FOS route :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now called the Halifax 8 times and still no one will call me back regarding the complaint. I just want to speak to a person who has actually looked at the case!!

 

I've complained formally to Halifax separately about the PPI Team's shoddy service, but is there a more formal independent body I can complain to specifically about their handling of my complaint? Or should I just put it all into my FOS complaint?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

ring the fos first and ask

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well, after more phone calls and lodging a separate complaint about how they have 'handled' my complaint, I finally got the call today to say that my PPI complaint has been upheld IN FULL!!!!

 

Taken forever to get there but FINALLY the result I was after!! Thank you so much to everyone who has helped me.

 

I guess the moral of the story is what everyone has been telling me all along - don't give up!!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey great news

 

let us know when you get the money

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Still waiting for the Halifax to cough up...or even send a letter confirming that they have upheld my complaint. Does anyone know how long they have to actually payout?? I've called them but just keep getting fobbed off as usual :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 weeks from you initial complaint

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Original complaint was posted to them on 25th April.

 

They acknowledged the complaint a couple of weeks later and finally agreed to pay in full on 3rd of September.

 

.. So its well past 8 weeks since the initial complaint but only 6 weeks since they agreed to uphold in full.

 

What are my options now?

 

Do they usually take this long to pay out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they shouldn't be dragging their heels

 

several banks have been fined already for such actions.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?382875-LLoyds-fined-£4.3M-for-obstructing-amp-delaying-140-000-PPI-reclaimants!

 

i'd give them a ring and remind them of such

else you'll be straight on the phone to the FCA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to them twice today.

 

They are beyond useless.

 

Lloyds have outsourced their PPI 'customer service' to the Philippines and

 

they literally never do anything other than 'escalate' my complaint

 

which means they are doing sweet fa.

 

If I speak to the halifax general telephone banking number,

they tell me that they can't help me on this line and to ring the PPi number.

 

I spoke to the FOS today, and they said that the bank have 8 weeks from agreeing the misale to pay the settlement?

Is this true?

 

They said if I haven't received anything after 8 weeks then I can raise a complaint with them,

but then I guess I'm going in a year long queue or something that in theory should already be resolved.

 

I literally loathe the Halifax!!

 

How hard can it be just to transfer the money to my account?

 

I shudder to think how many other people they are doing this to :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I'm literally at a loss with this now :(

 

It's been 71 days since the call saying that my complaint was being upheld, and still no payment. Each time I speak to the phillipines I get the same scripted response of them 'escalating' the complaint. Nothing ever happens.

 

Can anyone advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing to do then is to stop talking to a foreign call centre and get a letter off to the lender telling them that you have been advised that your complaint has been upheld and that you require the written offer within seven days or you will raise the issue with fos.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I can't believe I never updated this thread to let you guys know how I got on! Must have just completely slipped my mind!

 

 

The Halifax paid out in the end, I got a letter advising of the settlement on 02/12/13 and received a cheque for the full amount on 17/12/13. Took a lot of hard work and perseverance but with the help from you guys I go there in the end :)

 

 

I have since moved my banking away from the Halifax and now use First Direct, who seem much better!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...