Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx, with link having multiple accounts for me, I didn’t want to be a pushover in the first one ideally.. hearing is 3rd June, WS’s to be exchanged by 6th may 
    • he may be using a different name but cars and vans/vans and cars it’s all the same Gerard Bird/Gerry Bird/G Bird aka Gurdip Singh Virdi He is still doing the same thing, operating from the same premises at 101a Longford, I’m guessing during Covid they got the great idea to rip people off remotely and charge people for the pleasure. they now deliver cars that are shocking quality and refuse to even accept the issues you find. Then Gaslight you into thinking your the problem and call you an idiot for buying a used car instead of a new one. Buyers beware this thread is vitally important     
    • Changes to China's state secrets law requires internet firms to monitor information shared by users.View the full article
    • The only way to verify whether there is any financial reward for the management is seeing the agreement. That would be required during disclosure IF court proceedings went ahead... Unless you could bring pressure to bear and get a copy?
    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How do you like it now Lloyds!?


cantsay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is probably why you did not get a response, claim forms should be addressed to their registered office in London.

 

If you attempt to enforce it, it is highly likely judgement will be set aside, i.e. the judgement becomes a nullity. This will delay you by a few months. Obviously if Lloyds pay up then these points are irrelevant.

 

I will come back to you later when I have a little more time with a positive way forward.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually , I looked at my form and it wasnt that address it was Customer Services recovery ,charlton place , Andover. Also it was one that was offered as an address by the court.Also, the court didnt mention anything about that and the onus on the bank, when they receive official court docs must be to ensure they get to the right dept surely! Not just ignore them and not respond to any letters from myself which have all been sent recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been on phone to the court, GuidoT , and they confirm that your point is wrong. The Bank have had the docs and they havent responded, the onus is on them, he said I could apply the warrant without fear of the bank saying "You sent it to the wrong address we want judgement set aside"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court staff have no legal training, should not be giving out advice (save on administrative matters) and often misinform people.

 

However, who you listen to is your prerogative.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not saying they are not be trusted per se, but they often misinform (not deliberately), however they are usually fine with administrative type matters.

 

See post 2 of the link below regarding the difficulties relating to default judgement:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/61649-issuing-request-judgement-want.html

 

As I promised in post 27, here is something a little more positive (if you want to listen to me that is).

 

I would write to Lloyds' registered office as below (and it should find its way to SCM) saying I have judgement in default, pay up in 14 days or I will take steps to enforce. That way they may pay up or alternatively in the event you do enforce then you can show the judge that you also took reasonable steps to bring the matter to the Lloyds attention and provided them with a warning.

 

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc

25 Gresham Street

London

EC2V 7HN

 

Others may have different views and consider a more aggressive approach appropriate.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate what your saying. As to bringing the matter to their attention! I think the registered letters and emails I've exchanged with them over the past few months may have given them a clue! As well as the official court doc's theyve had. I, as has nearly everyone dealing with Lloyds has had to bend over backwards to make sure we do things by the book and give them every opportunity to settle, but they take the pi**. The court has said I can enforce judgement and thats what I'm going to try to do. Why should I give them even more time. As the judge said in Kazzaws case, they have settled every single other case are are abusing not only court time, but my time as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...