Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Getting in first.


magpie99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. After days reading the plethora of info here, I have a few questions of my own.

 

So here is some background first:

 

About 2006 I left a nice well paid job at a bank (in the technology dept. honest!) and bought a franchise which failed partly due to my lack of business experience and part the economy. It was connected to real estate BTW.

 

For the last few years I've been trying to get back on my feet after a stress, overdrafts, divorce, debts, unemployment etc.

 

Over this time I struggled to meet all my obligations but (stupidly) never asked MBNA or others for a payment plan, to freeze interest etc, largely as I didn't know it was possible. :( Whilst I frequently missed MBNA payments for several months at a time, I've always attempted to make payments.

 

After missing many months of payments and lots of harassing letters, phone calls, emails etc in 2007 I received an unexpected email advising that they would accept a reduced payout of around £2500, approx 50% of the balance. If I'd had it I probably would have paid it.

 

Recently I have been working and things are finally looking up so I contacted MBNA and asked about a reduced early payment of the outstanding balance, to which they said they don't do this. So I forwarded the 2007 email.

 

They responded with "Ok, we do sometimes, but it will be on your record for six years" etc

 

Last month I paid the previous two months payments, so while I am not in 'default' I wondered if it was a better time to try negotiating an early settlement with them.

 

The thing is that I don't want to poke the nasty big dog with a stick and get bitten if I don't need to.

 

So:

 

- Using a template from CAG, I have written a SAR letter (which includes a request for the CCA) and will use Postal orders for payment.

- I've never been on a payment plan etc but I have been late on about 40% of payments over the last few years.

- I have ordered a £2 credit report from Equifax.

- I’ve copied my passport, but put some lines through the signature. Don’t know if that was pointless or not.

 

 

So my questions are:

 

- Do I need to do a CCA request when the SAR letter requests it anyway? i.e. Will MBNA ignore it in the SAR unless a separate CCA letter is requested?

- Is a signature (copy of passport etc) really necessary for creditors to comply with an SAR, CCA etc? Does anyone have a link to OFT stating so?

- Can a debt be sold while not in default/dispute?

- What are the pros and cons of the SAR and early settlement conversation with an account that is being paid, even if inconsistently?

 

 

BTW, I did try to find the answers for myself, but there is so much info here that it is a little like drinking from a fire hose. For example, searching for "signature" found about 8 million 'signguard' results :) Not a complaint, just an explanation as to why I'm asking questions that have no doubt bee answered before.

 

 

Just in case it helps anyone I thought I’d mention this; I’ve provided a YAC phone number to MBNA which records the message and emails me an .mp3 recording. This avoids unpleasant calls at inconvenient times. There is a paid version of YAC, but I use the version that is free to me, but costs callers 42ppm Yac - Inbound call services I hope this is useful to someone.

 

Thanks

 

Magpie99

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all. After days reading the plethora of info here, I have a few questions of my own.

 

So here is some background first:

 

About 2006 I left a nice well paid job at a bank (in the technology dept. honest!) and bought a franchise which failed partly due to my lack of business experience and part the economy. It was connected to real estate BTW.

 

For the last few years I've been trying to get back on my feet after a stress, overdrafts, divorce, debts, unemployment etc.

 

Over this time I struggled to meet all my obligations but (stupidly) never asked MBNA or others for a payment plan, to freeze interest etc, largely as I didn't know it was possible. :( Whilst I frequently missed MBNA payments for several months at a time, I've always attempted to make payments.

 

After missing many months of payments and lots of harassing letters, phone calls, emails etc in 2007 I received an unexpected email advising that they would accept a reduced payout of around £2500, approx 50% of the balance. If I'd had it I probably would have paid it.

 

Recently I have been working and things are finally looking up so I contacted MBNA and asked about a reduced early payment of the outstanding balance, to which they said they don't do this. So I forwarded the 2007 email.

 

They responded with "Ok, we do sometimes, but it will be on your record for six years" etc

 

Last month I paid the previous two months payments, so while I am not in 'default' I wondered if it was a better time to try negotiating an early settlement with them.

 

The thing is that I don't want to poke the nasty big dog with a stick and get bitten if I don't need to.

 

So:

 

- Using a template from CAG, I have written a SAR letter (which includes a request for the CCA) and will use Postal orders for payment.

- I've never been on a payment plan etc but I have been late on about 40% of payments over the last few years.

- I have ordered a £2 credit report from Equifax.

- I’ve copied my passport, but put some lines through the signature. Don’t know if that was pointless or not.

 

 

So my questions are:

 

- Do I need to do a CCA request when the SAR letter requests it anyway? i.e. Will MBNA ignore it in the SAR unless a separate CCA letter is requested?

 

if you put a line in the SAR that you want it , no need to send sep CCA request, though most MBNA stuff from that era is crap anyway.

 

- Is a signature (copy of passport etc) really necessary for creditors to comply with an SAR, CCA etc? Does anyone have a link to OFT stating so?

 

no its not, if they are quite happy to send statements/demand for payments, then why do they need to check it s YOU wanting the SAR??

sadly, it just delaying tactic usually

 

 

- Can a debt be sold while not in default/dispute?

 

yes

 

- What are the pros and cons of the SAR and early settlement conversation with an account that is being paid, even if inconsistently?

 

i would not settle without valid CCA, and after reclaiming mis-sold PPI and/or unlawful charges.

 

 

BTW, I did try to find the answers for myself, but there is so much info here that it is a little like drinking from a fire hose. For example, searching for "signature" found about 8 million 'signguard' results :) Not a complaint, just an explanation as to why I'm asking questions that have no doubt bee answered before.

 

 

Just in case it helps anyone I thought I’d mention this; I’ve provided a YAC phone number to MBNA which records the message and emails me an .mp3 recording. This avoids unpleasant calls at inconvenient times. There is a paid version of YAC, but I use the version that is free to me, but costs callers 42ppm Yac - Inbound call services I hope this is useful to someone.

 

Thanks

 

Magpie99

 

you are in good hands in the MBNA forum

 

lots of people are infront of you in your quest.

follow those threads

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that DX, I know it was a chore to read.

 

OK, I got all that. Your last comment was interesting:

 

i would not settle without valid CCA, and after reclaiming mis-sold PPI and/or unlawful charges.

 

I'm sure that I took PPI for a while some years back with MBNA, but I would like to look at the SAR history first.

 

What actually defines "unlawful charges"? Surely not all late penalties?, or is it the compound interest based on those charges?

 

If I understand correctly, why pay and get a 6 year partial payment / negative history when I can have one for free?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that DX, I know it was a chore to read.

 

OK, I got all that. Your last comment was interesting:

 

 

 

I'm sure that I took PPI for a while some years back with MBNA, but I would like to look at the SAR history first.

 

What actually defines "unlawful charges"? Surely not all late penalties?,

 

yes ALL OF THEM, inc over limit ones too!!

 

or is it the compound interest based on those charges?

 

AND the compound intererst at THEIR rate + 8% stat too on EVERY charge from the date it was levied to the date of your claim.

 

If I understand correctly, why pay and get a 6 year partial payment / negative history when I can have one for free?

 

you need to be cute here.

 

IF you went over limit because of their unlawful charges, then IF they refund said charges, they MUST remove any markers because of that charge...get me drift?

 

now, just a word of warning: partial settlement is a WASTE OF TIME, its as bad on your score as a string of defaults.

 

it is always best to get ALL negative markers/ etc etc REMOVED by them as a 'goodwill' gesture of your F&F.

 

there is little point in wasting your money if they won't do that.

 

what works quite nicely is : i will pay you £XXX to settle the A/C and for you to remove ALL negative markers frommy cra recordss.

if you will not do that, it will be £5 PCM and take me to court if you like!

 

no JUDGE will EVER make you pay more than you offer.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Point(s) taken. Thanks.

 

Put bluntly like that, then I definitely won't go for a settlement without F&F.

 

While I'm waiting for their 'response' I'll research the wording for my "please refund all the charges" letter.

 

BTW, I appreciate the help as it's quite a challenge to catchup on years legal decisions, legislative changes etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I forgot to mention that they recently called me and politely demanded a payment which I said that I would be paying in a few days once my wages had cleared.

 

The woman accepted my response after I pointed out that I had been making full monthly payments. She did warn that if I didn't pay then I'd be getting harassing calls within days. Then she asked me a very surprising question, given that the card is currently suspended:

 

"Would you be interested in an MBNA personal loan?

 

:eek::eek::eek:

Edited by magpie99
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...