Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi and greetings to one and all. this is my first ever post on the site so all help is valued.

Recently my car caught on fire. the insurance deemed it a total loss. they asked me for the paper work which i provided. once they received the paper work i received a call informing me that a cheque should be dispatched within 7-10 working days. this time passed as of yesterday so i called them this morning. the gentleman i spoke to said there was a problem with my log book and they are waiting to hear from head office with a decision. He said the problem was that the log book was in my sisters name. i've read elsewhere about 'fronting' but this isnt the case. i was the sole driver and insurer of the car so its not like i was trying to get a cheaper premium. should this be a problem?

thanks in advance.

 

ps . i apologise for the bad spelling and capitalisation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurers get a bit suspicious when the registered keeper is not the policyholder.

 

Having said that, in law, the registered keeper is NOT always the legal owner, BUT usually when a proposal is taken they ask 'are you the registered keeper and owner of the vehicle' , so if you answered yes to that question and they now find out that you are not the registered keeper it could cause you a problem.

 

From a legal point of view, for someone other than the registered keeper/owner to insure a vehicle they have to have 'insurable interest' in that which is being insured, in your case you would need to show that you needed insurance because if anything happened to it then you would be liable for replacement costs etc.

 

The obvious question is why was the car registered in your sisters name, please give me honest answers and then I can help you better.

 

Who really bought/owned the car? If your sister has no licence and nothing to do with the car then why was it registered in her name?

 

There are a few possible outcomes, the most serious is that the insurers declare the policy void because they were misled regarding registered keeper, that's not something they would do lightly and once you answer the questions above I'll be better placed to advise if that's a possibility.

 

If it's an innocent mistake they may decide to deal with the claim (or they may impose a slight charge and then deal with the claim).

 

I agree it's not a case of fronting from what you have said.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just spoken to my insurance company. During the conversation the gentleman i spoke to said they because of the unusual circumstances i.e finance in the mrs' name and log book in my sisters name that they will be appointing an independent body to ask me a few more questions in order to clarify the claim details. the company is called quest partnership. i've googled them but they have very little if any details about themselves on the site.

my question to you is have you ever had any dealings or do you have any knowledge of this particular company or any of its type. If so what can i expect? What do they do? why has the insurance company really appointed them?

 

any help appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want help then you need to answer the questions Mossycat put to you!!

 

Mossy really is the best one to give you an insight in to how the insurance works, but at the end of the day we need to know why the car was registered as your sisters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't normally post PM's up here, but it will help to make this thread more understandable and possibly help others with a similar problem

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by dolaphonic

THanks for the reply.

its a tad confusing or not dependent upon your view.

my girlfriend got the car for me on finance so obviously the first name on the log book was my girlfriends. shortly after i bought the car i moved to my sisters but had no intention of driving the car for a bit. a friend told me that i had to change the keepers details in case i needed to declare it SORN. once i started driving the car again i intended to change the log book back into my name but bad luck got to me before i remembered. i know my sister would be classed as keeper but i can prove i owned and maintained the vehicle by service and repair records from bmw.

what are the odds of them not paying out? as i said there was no fronting involved so i cant form a laymens view see the problem.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mossycat

It sounds like an honest mistake, you were given wrong advice RE the SORN declaration, but that's of little consequence.

It is clearly not a case of fronting or any other attempt to get a reduced premium, so I'd explain this to your insurers and I'd expect them to deal with your claim, if they don't then PM me and let me know what they say.

 

Originally Posted by dolaphonic

Hi once again,

I have just spoken to my insurance company. During the conversation the gentleman i spoke to said they because of the unusual circumstances i.e finance in the mrs' name and log book in my sisters name that they will be appointing an independent body to ask me a few more questions in order to clarify the claim details. the company is called quest partnership. i've googled them but they have very little if any details about themselves on the site.

my question to you is have you ever had any dealings or do you have any knowledge of this particular company or any of its type. If so what can i expect? What do they do? why has the insurance company really appointed them?

many thanks in advance for any help given

 

 

Originally Posted by Mossycat

I've never heard of them, I'd be tempted to post this update on the thread you started and see if any of the other insurance guys have.

It sounds like they want to investigate it a bit further (which is reasonable), so my advice at this stage is play along and be honest, if they end up rejecting your claim (which I think is unlikely) there are a number of things that you can do, but let's wait and see what they say first

 

 

Mossy

Edited by Mossycat
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...