Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • be very wary upon what you see being recently posted on here 😎 regarding KIH.... all is not what it seems...  
    • 1st - all my posts on CAG are made not only in reply to the specific issue the topic starter makes but also in a general matter to advise any future readers upon the related subject - here it is kings interhigh online school. KIH lets take this topic apart shall we so readers know the real situation and the real truth...and underline the correct way to deal with KIH. https://tinyurl.com/ycxb4fk7 Kings Interhigh Online School issues - Training and Apprenticeships - Consumer Action Group - but did not ever reply to the last post.  but the user then went around every existing topic here on CAG about KIH pointing to the above topic and the 'want' to make some form of group  promoting some  'class action' against KIH . then on the 2nd march this very topic this msg is in was created. all remarkably similar eh? all appear to be or state..they are in spain... ....as well as the earlier post flaunting their linkedin ID, (same profile picture) that might have slipped through via email before our admin killed it.., trying to give some kind of legitimacy to their 'credentials' of being 'an honest poster'....oh and some kind of 'zen' website using a .co.uk  address (when in spain- bit like the Chinese ebay sallers) they run ... and now we get the father of the bride ...no sorry...father of a child at the uk-based international school in question posting ...pretending to be not the 'other alf... do you really think people are that stupid..... ................... nope you never owed that in the 1st place... wake up you got had and grabbed the phone - oh no they are taking me to court under UK jurisdiction...and fell for every trick in the book that they would never ever put in writing that could be placed in front of a court operating under their stated uk jurisdiction wherever you live. T&C's are always challengeable under UK law this very site would not exist if it were not for the +£Bn's bank charges reclaiming from 2006> and latterly the +£Bn's of PPI reclaiming both directly stated in the banks' T&C's were they claimed they were legally enforceable ...not!! they lost big time... why? a waste of more money if you've not got a court claim....... why not use them for a good outcome...go reclaim that £1000 refundable deposit you got scammed out of . people please research very carefully ...you never know who any of these people are that are posting about kings interhigh and their 'stories' they could even be one of their online tutors or a shill . don't get taken in. dx      
    • @KingsParent thank you for sharing your experience.  I also tried contacting the CEO but didn’t get very far. Do you mind sharing his contact details?  kind regards   
    • Thank you Rocky for the clarifications though they did cause a problem at first since an original windsccreen ticket was  of a different breach some time before. The current windscreen ticket only states that you were parked there for 6 minutes which is just one minute over the minimum time allowed as the Consideration period. There is no further proof that you parked there for any longer than that is there? More photographs for example? Moving on to the Notice to Keeper-it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. First there is no parking period mentioned on it. there is the time 20.25 stated which coincides with the W/S ticket but a parking period must have a starting and finishing time-just one time is insufficient to qualify as a parking  period as required in Section 9 [2] [a] . Are there any different photos shown on the NTK comapared to the w/s PCN? Not that that would make a difference as far as PoFA goes since the times required by PoFA should be on the NTK but at the moment Met only appear to show that you stayed there for 6 minutes. Another failure to comply with PoFA is at S9([2][e] where their wording should be "the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; ". You can see on your NTK that they misssed off the words in brackets. Met cannot therefore transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable. Then their is the discrepancy with the post code on the NTK  HA4 0EY which differs from the post code on the contract and the Post Office Postcode Finder which both list it as HA4 0FY. As you were not parked in HA4 0EY the breach did not occur. In the same way as if you were caught speeding in the Mall in London, yet you were charged with speeding in Pall mall London [a street nearby] you would be found not guilty since though you were speeding you were not speeding in Pall Mall. I bow to Eric's brother on his reasoning on post 12 re the electric bay abuse  That wording is not listed on their signs nor is there any mention on the contract of any electric charging points at all let alone who can park there or use them. He is quite right too that the entrance sign is merely an invitaion to treat it cannot form a contrct with motorists. Also the contract looks extremely  short no doubt there will be more when we see the full Witness statement. As it stands there is no confirmation from Standard Life [or Lift !] on the contract that Savills are able to act on their behalf. Also most contracts are signed at the end of the contract to prevent either side adding extra points. So their percentage  chance of winning their case would be somewhere between 0.01 and 0.02.    
    • @dx100uk no, haven’t received any correspondence as of yet. Still waiting on a court date but seems to be taking forever. Have noticed an increase in unhappy customers on here
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CAG toolbar - very disappointing


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The take-up of the CAG toolbar is very disappointing - and we really do need some help.

 

If you haven't downloaded it then please have a look. The most important thing for us is that you use the search function because it will generate some revenue for us if you click the sponsored ads.

 

It doesn't cost you anything at all. The money comes from the sponsors of the ads.

You can download the toolbar from here

 

We have bills to pay and it is very tight at the moment.

No one gets paid except one person who does admin for us.

 

Donations are very down. Book sales have become a trickle and the couple of advertising links that we have don't produce anything much at all.

 

At the moment, any revenue of any use is produced by our search boxes at the top and the bottom of the forum.

 

We think that we can increase this if you use our toolbar on your browser and get into the habit of using it for your normal searches.

 

The revenue problem is a problem for the CAG and it is a problem for all of the people who come to us for help because it means that our existence becomes precarious.

 

You would imagine that with over quarter million registered users and 700,000 unique visitors per month that donations would be flooding in and that everything would be hunky-dory.

Well it's not like that at all. Hardly anyone donates. Some people donate £10 but most people who donate are now donating £1 or £2. I appreciate that for many people even these small sums are a sacrifice but after Paypal takes its cut, there isn't much left. And of course, the vast majority of people just don't contribute anything at all.

 

 

How can you help us?

 

Of course, if you can donate then that would be great. But if you can't afford it, then don't worry. Don't get yourselves back into debt on our account - but what you can do, at no cost to yourself, is to download our toolbar and use it to make your web searches. If enough people did that it would make a big difference.

 

How else can you help? Refer to our toolbar in your forum signatures and let your friends know.

You could even include a link to our toolbar page in your emails.

 

Whatever you can do to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. How can I add the CAG toolbar to my signature?

2. In relation to the search box in the CAG Toolbar (which I have), who powers the search? Is this essentially a substitute for Google?

3. May I suggest that CAG implements a scheme to keep prompting all it's users and visitors to install the toolbar and use the search engine? Not sure how this can be done (maybe by weekly email or the first time the site is accessed each week). I only came to this thread because a link to it was at the foot of a post I read!!!

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The search engine is Yahoo.

 

I think that you will have to experiment with the sig. There is a way to include links. Maybe one of the mods will be able to tell you. I'll flag it to them.

 

Yes, we are trying to push the issue of the toolbar and revenue generally.

 

Thanks very much for taking an interest. It is very important to us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BF - I would suspect that most people either are not reading the posts about this or have their toolbar in place and are unwilling to install another one.

 

Is it allowed to send out a more simplified version of your post by email to ask for donations?

 

If all the recently visiting new members realised how dire things are and contributed just £2 each, that would be one heck of a boost to the funds.

 

I think people genuinely have no idea of the costs of hosting and running a site such as this. Would it be a good idea to give an idea so that they can understand?

 

If we lost this site, frankly, one heck of a load of consumers would be stuffed - permanently - as there is nothing quite like it for help and support and it's not something that can be replaced at the drop of a hat.

 

Maybe you need a fund raising forum or group of members? Get some brainstorming on the go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but this is going to sound negative, negative negative.

 

I wish we could send out lots of emails but we don't have the money.

 

To send a bulk email to our entire userbase would probably cost £3000 or more.

 

Also, we don't have the personal resources to start organising fundrasing. I'm afraid that it needs other people with the ideas and the energy to decide to set it up and to do the job.

A fund-rasing forum is a great idea - but it wouldn't produce the individuals with the drive to get on and do it. And that's what's needed.

 

Also, I can tell you that if we had charged even only £1 for membership of this forum, we would still be very small and we wouldn't have the information resource that we do have here.

 

People get very suspicious or very tight about giving their money away - unless, it is to bank charges or payday loan companies. Then they don't seem to care very much!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

BF

 

Something has to be done. How about just adding some text to EVERYONE'S signatures or to the top of each reminder email we get whenever our subscribe forums are updated?

 

Phoenix is right most people have not a clue that the finances are in dire shape. I say urgent action is needed lest things get worse.

 

Part of it of course is the general economic malaise people find themselves in. Yet, in my view and that of many, CAG is worth every penny!

 

The masses of users and visitors need to know how easy it is to help and they'll be downloading the toolbar and clicking away at those sponsored links!!!!

 

For example, how many links do I have to click on to donate a pound (£1)?:D. If there was a way to make this an automatic weekly or monthly activity for say 20% of CAGGERS, would it be enough BF?

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BF

 

Something has to be done. How about just adding some text to EVERYONE'S signatures or to the top of each reminder email we get whenever our subscribe forums are updated?

 

Phoenix is right most people have not a clue that the finances are in dire shape. I say urgent action is needed lest things get worse.

 

Part of it of course is the general economic malaise people find themselves in. Yet, in my view and that of many, CAG is worth every penny!

 

The masses of users and visitors need to know how easy it is to help and they'll be downloading the toolbar and clicking away at those sponsored links!!!!

 

For example, how many links do I have to click on to donate a pound (£1)?:D. If there was a way to make this an automatic weekly or monthly activity for say 20% of CAGGERS, would it be enough BF?

 

If 20% donated regularly, that would make us very secure and allow us to do some interesting things.

 

However, donating a £1 at a time doesn't make sense because Paypal takes their fee as well as their %.

 

It is better that donations come in as large sums as possible.

£10 makes much more sense than 10 x £1.

 

Of course, in addition to the toolbar, people could just donate.

It just seemed that the toolbar is a good way for people to help without actually having to put their hands in their own pockets.

 

If people want something to show for their money - in addition to what they get on-site, then buying our materials would help too - but it seems that at the moment, people don't even want to do that very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't use Firefox or Explorer, Is there a Toolbar for Opera?

 

I've flagged this to Webmaster

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BF.

 

I’ve added the toolbar and will use it at every opportunity.

 

I have also added a link to my signature but two points arise from this:

 

  • Because I don’t post that often and my posts are frequently short, my signature rarely appears. Is it possible to restore the signatures of members on request?
  • It’s better to link to your Global Announcement, rather than the plug-in page, because the advantages of using the toolbar are explained. However, the link will presumably become invalid after 8th July so perhaps your announcement could be made a sticky in the General Forum.

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

I'll look into signatures.

 

Announcement expiry is very easily changed - but what you say about the explanatory page is very true. We'll add an explanation to the download page too.

Ta

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add a bit about Paypal.......

 

Whilst it's obviously very costly to send £1 to the actual site, if a small group of people who know or trust each other sent a small donation of £1 or £2 to one person who has a Paypal account, by using the 'Send Money' option, selecting the Personal tab/ Gift, using existing funds within their own Paypal account, that is free for both parties.

 

That person could then send the total donation to the website as normal.

 

The 'free' option for sending money cannot be used to donate to the website because that would raise flags with Paypal and they'd sanction the website account.

 

But it would mean that small groups could band together to raise a more feasible sum to then donate to the website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If 20% donated regularly, that would make us very secure and allow us to do some interesting things.

 

However, donating a £1 at a time doesn't make sense because Paypal takes their fee as well as their %.

 

It is better that donations come in as large sums as possible.

£10 makes much more sense than 10 x £1

BF

 

My point here was not to donate £1 via PayPal. I wanted to know what it would take in number of clicks on sponsored links via the toolbar for CAG to receive £1 from the clicks.

 

This way if enough people, say 20% of 250,000 = 50,000, simply did enough toolbar search clicks each month to each generate £1 for the site(£50K), it hasn't really cost them anything but will have done the site a world of good.

 

If this practice could then be encouraged as a monthly habit (e.g. with competitions/rewards etc), it could take off as perpetual funding source:). In addition to the usual donations of course:D.

 

BF, please bear in mind that the downturn in funding that CAG is experiencing is reflective of the economic times and not only a lack of interest from Caggers. It makes sense to look at any viable funding sources that don't compromise CAG.

Edited by bustthematrix

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BF

Can u give an idea of the minimum income CAG needs per month/annum?

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BF

 

 

 

If this practice could then be encouraged as a monthly habit (e.g. with competitions/rewards etc), it could take off as perpetual funding source:). In addition to the usual donations of course:D.

 

.

 

Yes, that would ba an ideal situation. However, we can't encourage people to make revenue-generating searches just to help us. Advertisers would soon realise and there would be trouble.

 

That's why the toolbar is so useful because if people can get into the culture of using that for their searches then I expect that it would make a heafty difference.

 

We are going to be looking and taking on more affiliate links.

 

How much do we need each month?

 

About £1100 average allows us to tread water - keeping all our expenses paid which includes one admin support, accountancy, server fees, domain fees, software updates, tech maintenance some telephone, ISP and tech expenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that would ba an ideal situation. However, we can't encourage people to make revenue-generating searches just to help us. Advertisers would soon realise and there would be trouble.

Hi BF

 

This is why I said as long as 'CAG is not compromised'. My thinking is that simply by encouraging people to use the toolbar there would be natural traffic to these links. I think it's helpful for people to know how CAG gets revenue from their activity in order for it to work. i.e.

 

- by using the toolbar in itself or

- by using it for searches (alternative to Google)

- only when a sponsored link is clicked or

- whenever any link is clicked, sponsored or not

 

That way they can be more purposeful.

 

If CAG can get 50,000 searching each month, I doubt any advertisers would be too bothered as they are more interested in the visibility they get. Caggers conducting specific searches would only see relevant sponsored links in their results and they are likely to click these anyway.

 

In my view it's not necessarily a subversive strategy unless it's promoted in that manner, which I'm sure will not happen.

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
BF

 

My point here was not to donate £1 via PayPal. I wanted to know what it would take in number of clicks on sponsored links via the toolbar for CAG to receive £1 from the clicks.

 

This way if enough people, say 20% of 250,000 = 50,000, simply did enough toolbar search clicks each month to each generate £1 for the site(£50K), it hasn't really cost them anything but will have done the site a world of good.

 

If this practice could then be encouraged as a monthly habit (e.g. with competitions/rewards etc), it could take off as perpetual funding source:). In addition to the usual donations of course:D.

 

BF, please bear in mind that the downturn in funding that CAG is experiencing is reflective of the economic times and not only a lack of interest from Caggers. It makes sense to look at any viable funding sources that don't compromise CAG.

 

50k a month?

 

why would you need so much if you actually need around £1,100 a month to tread water? as you state above.

 

BF, you have to be careful here, people will always be sceptical of money raising as money lining pockets, especially if you need 1100 quid a month but make plans to make over 50 grand a month.

 

Not sure you done yourself many favours with the last few posts.

 

Mayeb i have the wrong end of the stick, if so, apologies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Banish,

 

BF didn’t say anything about the 50k it was bustthematrix. I don’t see anything wrong with BF’s posts personally; maybe you got the usernames mixed-up?

 

best regards.

 

yes you are correct, i did get them mixed up.

 

but upon reflection, BF did say securing donation from 20% of the client base, 50,000 people, would secure them.

 

so in essence, what buster has said in monetary terms does relate to the 20% of readership/signees/client base that BF mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes indeed he did, sorry. It could be argued that once the paypal fees have been deducted, the total would be much less than 50k.

In any case I doubt BF needs me defending him/her, so I shall bid you a good night. :)

Best regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

People shouldn't be suspicious of donating AFTER they've received good help from this site. Maybe people could be FORCED to donate after a certain number of posts so that they've had the help by then (anyone who has posted 100 times will have got many answers to their questions). Many sites do this.

 

Even a membership fee structure may work and those who pay get access to restricted areas with extra information.

 

I agree the site is a not for profit setup but that doesn't mean it can't have surplus income which can be used for future running costs.

 

There is no excuse for anyone not paying even £1 and with a membership of over 250,000 that would generate ongoing income. Don't forget that many people would not get the refunds they do if it wasn't for this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I've made small donations in the past and will do so again in the future. As for the toolbar - I used to use it, but then I switched from using Firefox to Google Chrome and there is no CAG toolbar available. I've asked this before on another thread, but is there any likelihood that there will be a Google Chrome version of the toolbar at some point in the future?

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

by tifo : Maybe people could be FORCED to donatelink3.gif after a certain number of posts so that they've had the help by then (anyone who has posted 100 times will have got many answers to their questions). Many sites do this.

 

 

How about those who GIVE advice rather than receiving it TIFO ? If they were forced to donate (although I have donated in the past anyway) the advice would dry up I'm thinking ..... :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...