Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cygnet and ACF, faults with car and bill of sale problems.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4396 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya

 

Ok, if what you state is correct with the date and signing then the BoS is void, it must be 7 clear days(unless one of them are a bank holiday), chances are your is void, but you have to get it void.

 

heres the act http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1878/cukpga_18780031_en_1 have a look at the amendments after.

 

look at point 8. clear as a crystal.

 

Now if the BoS is void the CCA can still be enforcable and that they have to follow the CCA 1974, to stop them repo you must have paid more than a 3rd, after that they need a court order.

 

If it was me, I would challange the BoS and get it void. as it clearly is-one issue down

Then I would then write a letter to the company and complain, letter only no phone calls, you want a paper trail (keep the envlopes-date stamp) Send all letters via reg mail. SAR the company, this will get all the information on your account, even telephone transcripts and CHARGES to said account.

 

Complaining puts the account under serious dispute (you can put that in the letter) they have 6 weeks to sort your issue out, if you still do not get satisfaction make a complaint to the FO and TS. You can tell them if you wish that the BoS is void, stating the 7 days rule and you can then as them for a explination on why your signature is on a piece of paper you have never signed...see what they say-if anything...

 

trooper68

Trooper68:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok thats great thanks, but if the BOS is void and i argue the case and win, where does that leave me?

 

Ideally i want to get rid of the car, it was a rush purchase and it costs me too much in fuel/finance/insurance every month. Ive only had it for 9 months, but including the deposit have paid over half what the car is worth!

 

If the BOS is void, would this mean, as the loan is no longer secured on the car, i could sell the car and pay off the finance?

 

Im just trying to see the best and least finanicially draining way of getting rid of this massive mistake!! :(

 

If theres a technicality i can use through the BOS and CCA thats perfect, but im more than prepared to still be left with some kind of debt, its just how thats enforceable and how i can negotiate the figure?

 

Thanks a lot for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

Ive posted a few times on this subject but still dont have a definite answer.

 

Ive determined that my BOS is definitely void so where does that leave me?

 

I want to get rid of the car, its an absolte drain on my finances in terms of finance, fuel and insurance, so the ideal outcome would be for me to get rid completely!

 

So if the BOS is void, does this mean i can hand the car back or at least reduce my payments as the loan is no longer secured on the car?

 

Any advice welcome!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes there is also a CCA in place.

 

The BOS was stamped outside of the 7 days, doesnt have a solicitors details and was signed by the agent who sold me the car. All of which i believe makes it void? I havent checked the text of the CCA to ensure that too is correct.

Yes its Cygnet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well now the good news

 

the bos and agreement will be linked

 

if one is defective, both are but you will have one hell of a fight on your hands

 

i need you to scan your agreement into your computer

 

then upload it onto your thread by googling a program called photobucket

 

if you have any probs ill send you my email address and ill do it

 

remember to deleate personal info but leave in the figures

 

imost of these micky mouse agreements have somthing wrong with them and i am quite good at spotting them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Im posting this as a seperate thread in order to get some urgent help really!

 

There is much opinion on the '7 day rule'. The simple google definition is:

 

''days reckoned from one day to another, excluding both the first and last day; as,

from Sunday to Sunday there are six clear days.''

 

My questions are

 

1) My BOS was stamped on 21st Dec and stamped on the 29th. That means it was stamped on the 8th day, but by the above definition, excluding the first and last day, would that make it valid?

 

2) Is Christmas day excluded from the clear day definition?

 

Any help appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 4 months later...
Hi i have a sale and bill agreement with a company callled the funding corporation. I thought my agreement was on hp not this rubbish sale and bill. I want to know if there is anyway out of the agreement. Please let me know.

 

Look at post #2

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends if the BOS has been regitered at the high court, which it must be to be valid.

You can check by writting to the high court with the details. If has not been registered they cannot take it back or take you to court for the money.

Is there any mention on the BOS about it being regulated by the CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi all

 

I started a number of threads on this back in 2010. I have a car with Cygnet with a 'void' bill of sale. It seemed to be the opinion, legal or otherwise , that a void BOS would mean a void CCA but nothing concrete.

 

Ive read the more recent posts regarding the issues around BOS and the CCA, but it still seems there is no definite answer as to whether the credit agreement would also be void.

 

Does anyone have any further insight on the matter?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

I was actually going to settle my car finance before i started to read about VT.!

 

Ive already posted a number of times about my cars void bill of sale, but it seems no clearer as to whether that would void my credit agreement?

 

Anyhow, a quick question about VT. I have finance with the funding corporation, I've paid over half the TOTAL payable so if i can't hand the car back based on a void bill of sale, i believe at this stage i can hand it back on a VT?

 

The only issue is, its just expired on its MOT and i know it needs some work doing, new tyres and potentially new break pads.

Can i hand it back without an MOT? Its taxed and insured.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have a car on credit agreement secured on a bill of sale rather than a hire purchase agreement. I have paid over half the total payable and am wondering if i can return it on voluntary termination.

 

Ive read lots of contradictory posts, some saying you can terminate on credit agreement AND HP, others saying on HP only.

 

Ive checked my contract and interestingly the only box not ticked is the option to terminate early!

The company in question are fairly dodgy, ridiculous interest rates etc and I've been trying to prove for a while that the bill of sale the car is secured on is actually void. The popular opinion in all consumer/legal forums is that I'm correct but trying to find a piece of law that isn't archaic to support my case is very tricky!

 

Anyway, my question is can i terminate? If not, is the bill of sale anything to bargain with?

 

And why would they include the option to terminate early yet its the only section of the contract i wasn't asked to initial and sign?

 

The other question is, if i can terminate, does the car have to be MOT'd? Its just expired! The car is in good condition but does need new tyres and potentially new break pads. Its taxed.

 

Im in the UK, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im having the same problem , this is my take on it :The agreement is set up to confuse and deceive.

The first page leads you to believe you are signing a credit agreement regulated fully by the cca act 1974, but your not, this is how regulated agreements should be set out according to the 1974 act and as they are using the bill of sale act 1882 they need to show the figures clearly.

 

Then the 1974 act is mentioned in section 6 and 7 of the bill of sale again this is to deceive as all I think it means is any default notice or termination letter has to be worded correctly according to the 1974 act.

They do not tell you that they can default after 1 late payment then reposes after terminating regardless of how much you have paid yet if you had paid a third under the 1974 act they would have to go to court for repossession order so it is not fully regulated under the 1974 act . its normally 2 missed payments before default triggered

 

The only signature you will find is on the bill of sale regulated under the 1878 act ammended 1882. If you take the first page with the figures on it and no signature on it away all your left with is a bill of sale.

DONT FORGET THIS IS ONLY MY TAKE ON IT. So if the bill of sale is void there is no agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that if the BOS is void the security is void - but the regulated credit agreement would still exist; just in an 'unsecured' capacity - so long as it adheres to the contractual requires of the CCA.

 

It has, however, been a while since I spent a great deal of time on these so wouldn't know of any developments and/or case law that has happened in the last 18 months or so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...