Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

1 Follower

About tonycard

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 1 Date of the infringement 12/ 02/2020 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] [scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] 3 Date received 27/02/2020 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up no 7 Who is the parking company? UKCPS 8. Where exactly [carpa
  2. Second ticket in a montukcps1.pdfh, both issued on a wednesday ukcps12.docx
  3. Guess what, I've just received another of these tickets through the post, same sort of photo as first one and I still have the ticket that shows I've paid, uploading the the scans later
  4. On the 9 Dec I purchased a car from a dealer through hire purchase, the car is 2 years old and had a advertised mileage of 17000 . The salesman informed me that the odometer was faulty, but I could take the car and arrange to have it done at my local Vauxhall garage, as the car was still under warranty and if Incurred any cost they would pay. I did this,only to be told that the instrument panel did not belong to that car and it was second hand. Vauxhalls told me that they had to email Germany to get permission to reprogram the car,it was granted. After the
  5. I have uploaded scans I think, the ticket I purchased shows entry time 15 Jan 09.03. The time issued on the NTK is 10.45 The only photograph on the NTK is front reg
  6. valid ticket displayed yet still got a penalty notice through the post, I still have the ticket, should I appeal or just ignore it? 1 Date of the infringement 15 01 20 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence
  7. Can a company who have purchased a debt continue with court action if they cannot produce a copy of the agreement for credit card, when requested under cca. They admitted that they did not have it yet still went through with the court claim and got judgement by default.
  8. Well this ones raised its ugly head again. the finance company agreed to a payment of £2000 for the first car and that debt would be cleared. now they have sent a bill via their solicitors for over 10k for the first vehicle this includes interest of over 5k accruing at £4.50 a day. There was originally two entries on their credit file now there are three, they want full payment by the 11 /9 or they will start court proceedings. This has gone on long enough the couple are distraught yet again, but its so hard to help them as lot of the dealings where done over the phone they j
  9. The vehicle was purchased from Liverpool, give me an address where to send the information.I will pass it on. There will not be any phone calls, it was dealing with this matter by phone that cost them £2000
  10. Thanks for the reply dx, totally agree with the above, I believe even without all the problems that arose at the inspection they would have had a good case for miselling as the 130 checks could not have been carried out I ts what the finance company offered that's got me confused, Option one : Walk away and owe nothing ? would this mean that they the finance company have rejected the car? Option two : pay £2000 and they would refinance them into another car why would anyone pay £2000 for finance? The credit reference agencies are showing two entries from this fina
  11. About 3 years ago a car was purchased from carcraft through finance company by way of hp. within two weeks the engine management light kept coming on and all electrics cutting out, car taken back to carcraft who informed them that it was a coil pack fault and it needed replacing, (the coil pack had been replaced 12 months early, this information was supplied with the paper work that came with the car) the faults still continued so back the car went, this time they said the EML came on because there was no fluid in the hand brake system. these cars are supposed to go thr
  • Create New...