Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I've moved your thread to the Residential and Commercial lettings forum. People should be along to advise later. HB
    • Ah I never even considered it, odd f9r me because im Tech savvy. Had a look and sure enough its all there in my google timeline. Perfect. 
    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DN Natwest CC


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5056 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, in the autumn of this year i experienced a bit of cash flow probs, wrote to all my creditors explaining that this would last for no more than 6 months but i could only agree a part payment in the mean time. All oof them were fine and within 6 months i had paid off the balances. Natwest CC did send me a termination of contract notice bt i did not recieve any DN from them. They are insisting i did. They have now put a DN on my Credit file even though i stuck to my word and paid them in full. Am i correct in assuming that this is wrong as they have cancelled my contract, therefore they have no right to share my information with a third party? It lokks as though the DN was put on my file two months after me paying them off.....and i did not recieve any DN. I even asked them at the time if it would effect my Credit File and they said it would, but not severely if it was paid within 6 months. All of my other creditors were fine with this and have stuck to their word. Do I have a case against Natwest CC?

 

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing, i have just realised that they said they have issued me with a DN in october, however the date on the DN in the CRA file says for a breach in November? Can they now issue DN's in advance?? And all of the previous history for that account has vanished from the CRA record.........

Edited by peteisfishing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget the issue of did they send you a notice if they have added a default to your file after you have paid off the debt then yes you have a case against them.

 

On the issue of the default notice they should have sent you a notice of intention accompanied by a correctly executed default notice. This has to be done to comply with the lending code(section 36). The same also applies for the ICO's guidance on defaults.

 

You need to write to them requesting they provide you with a copy of both the notice of intention and default notice they apparantly issued you. If they cannot provide this they are in breach of the data protection act on the grounds of processing data unfairly.

 

Furthermore if they have ended the contract before giving you the chance to put things write ie, default notice then it is unlawful recission of contract.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have written to them yesterday, only an informal letter to get them to explain why they have done this. Sent recorded. I will see what they come back with then i will take them on. Whta about the dates? can they send a DN prior to the actual Default taking place? all sounds a bit odd to me, especially when i have stuck to my word and paid them off, like i said i would, within 6 months....dirt bags

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they will send you the notice giving you time to rectify it then they will record it if the conditions are not met so if an entry has been recorded in November then they would usually have sent it round september/october time.

 

A default notice is an intention and chance for you to put it right not actual confirmation they have put it on your file.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see, so correct me if i am wrong. I paid the balance at the end of Jan, the DN has appeared on my file at the end of Mar but dated "period ending 12 Feb" the alleged breach happened on the 11 Nov. to me it seems that they have issued the DN to the CRA after i have paid them off. Does this mean i have a case against them?

 

thanks for all the advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the have issued the default in November then it looks like it is correct if you have not paid until January.

 

Do you have a copy of it all?

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then as i said above you need both the default notice and notice of intention from them to check everything is in order.

 

These should be included in a SAR.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing which i have just realised, no record of this account was on my credit report since the account was opened in 1998. The only thing that is on there is the default. So even though my account has been impecible for 12 years the only thing they have reported to the CRA is the fact that i have defaulted. I have only just realised as i have a printed copy of my report from Jan. And nothing there regarding a Natwest CC. No other history is present.

I will write down in chronological order what the events have been for the last 6 months and would be greatful if i could be given some advise regarding the best form of attack.

Thanks for the advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the unfortunate business of been defaulted years of good work and clean credit files are literally trashed by the addition of a default.

 

Best way to go about this is to see what dates are on the actual notice and ensure it was sent with a notice of intention. This procedure is required under the lending code and ICO Guideance and really the only way of resolving the matter.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will find if you look at your file there will be the default entry on the month they added it then there will be nothing else after that month.

 

If there are outstanding balances they can report this to the CRA's until they eventually default you.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appeared in March, the balance was paid off on 19 of Jan. But the date says" Period ending 15 Feb 10" The entry has been made after the full balance was paid

Edited by peteisfishing
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the address that is attached to the account:NEW ACCOUNTS, CRA ENQUIRIES, CREDIT CARD OPERATIONS CENTRE, PO BOX 6050, SOUTHEND ON SEA, SS99 1WL...........why would it say new accounts when it is 12 years old? Although this is the first time it has appeared on my credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure.

 

They do not have to report to a credt reference agency on your account but more than likely will do. That is why they say we may share the running of your account with CRA's.

 

They can register a default if they wish to providing the correct procedure has been followed. Thats what you need to find about out. Anything else you really will be clutching a straws so to speak.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Entirely up to you, the information is for your use

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

just recieved a letter today from NW> I will put the full details up tomorrow, but one thing they have put in their reply is "A dn is deemed to have been served as soon as it is posted, wether i have recieved it or not and it does not need to be sent either recorded or regitestered post" This is as per the Consumer credit act. Is this correct?

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they seem to think.

 

You need to ask them to provide you with a copy of the notice of intention to file the default which should have accompanied it. They are required to send you this to comply with the lending code and ICO.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

James, i can't thank you enough for all the info. Could you please advise me of the next step. Would this be a SAR? If so do i need to ask for specific documents? I will be asking for the CCA, as this account was opened before Aprill 1999. Is there a template on here i could use?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you make a subject access request and request all data they hold on you relating to that account that is exactly what they should send.

 

You need to concentrate on asking them to send you the notice of intention to file the default and the actual default notice itself.

 

They actually need to send you both for it to be legit. Them saying it was sent and that is that just doesnt wash.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case i will Send them the SAR and ask for specificaly, the CCA, Intention to default and the DN, i don't think i require any more from them. I will send this off and let you know how i get on.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi just gone through same thing for last 6 months with natwest, they put a Default on all 3 CRA's but i never recieved a letter of intention or default notice? They had defaulted me on charges they had stuck on my account for missed direct debits totalling 181.00? Fully paid off now and shows settled on my cra's? But sent a subject access request over 6 months ago and they have only just replied after having a battle over them requesting my signature for id purposes but yet sent them a copy of driving licence, old statements with 3 different addresses on and they have just sent me a computer log printout of what conversations i have had with them since may 07, that is funny cos i opened the account in 2005, and they have still not given me info requested under DPA1998, so now i am also going to put CRA's on default now, for using wrongful info against me without natwest having written confirmation from myself?:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...