Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arnold Clark miss-sold Service Plan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4804 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, i will try to keep this short,

 

i bought a 1 year old peugeot 307 petrol from arnold clark with extended warranty and a 2 service plan,

 

A couple of months later i enquired while the car was in for a warranty repair how i use the service plan to get my free services, and found out that my cars service schedule is 20,000 miles or every 2 years,

well i thought i had won a watch as the 2 service plan would cover year 2 and 4 and by the time the 3rd service was due at year 6 my warranty would be up and i could use a cheaper garage for servicing if i still had the car.

 

All was fine and i was happy with the car, then it was due it's first service and this is when i found out that the 2 service plan had to be used within 2 years, this is when i realised that i had been conned, i was told that this was set in stone and could not be extended to cover my 2nd service.

 

i spoke to the sales manager about this as the salesman was off with a long term illness and got absolutley nowhere everyone i spoke to quoted "Arnold Clark recomend yearly servicing" although no one said we will force you to carry out yearly servicing by selling you a service plan that your car dosn't need!

 

So i worked out that if i had not purchased a service plan the peugeot warranty services would have cost me £120 for first service and £240 for it's second service = £360 to keep my warranty active and the car serviced to peugeot recomended services.

 

Now with the service plan (Which i believe is supposed to save the customer money) £250+ 5years intrest for my first sevice and for the 1 they will carry out even though the car is not due a service, and £240 for the second service = £490+ the 5 years intrest.

 

To be honest i was really happy with my car but this really got me down,

i gave up trying to talk to anyone, the salesman was supposed to contact me but never did (funny that he spoke to me daily while i was intrested in buying the car) it's now a year later and i'm getting phone calls looking for me to book my car in for my special service, which has now got me thinking if they do another service like it's first service, which would have cost £120 then i will be getting £240 worth of servicing for my £250+ 5years intrest.

 

I dont suppose theres anything i can do about it, but i thought i would put it to you guys before i book it in for its service.

 

Thanks for any advice you can give me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Silverfoxy, if you should contact using the above email address, and I think you should, make sure you post what they say here as well. You've been conned once remember.

When companies have bad reputations, they will try and keep any further information from being made public so potential customers can't see how they operate and go elsewhere.

 

All, and without exception, sellers who offer an insurance (which a warranty is) must tell you that you have a choice to go elsewhere to get your cover. If this didn't happen, then you have been mis-sold and can claim it back including any interest you have paid.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice scaniaman, i have had a reply from Alasdair and he is looking into the matter.

I will give him the chance to look into my complaint before i go to trading standards, but i now know where my next port of call will be if i get no joy.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Arnold Clark Company Rep

Dear All,

 

We at Customer Services are willing to look into any case brought to us, I do not normally personally take incoming calls etc day to day, but I am happy to be involved in a case if I am able to be, if not, one of the Customer Services team would be happy to look into things for you.

 

Please, if there is anything anyone has on the go, we may be able to help you, so e-mail on online.customer.services@arnoldclark.co.uk

 

Kind Regards

 

Alasdair

Customer Services Manager

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not looking into cases that is required, it's resolution.

 

The problems shouldn't be happening to start with and if your were to issue instructions to your staff that profit isn't the be all and end all of selling cars then there wouldn't be so many customers making complaints and having to fight for their rights.

 

It's not the single customer complaint that needs looking into, it is the sales method you employ and in some case the deliberately fraudulent way some of these sales are made.

 

Buying a car at one price and then being offered another at a higher price when a problem occurs is happening too often to be a coincidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Arnold Clark Company Rep

I can assure you that we are trying hard to improve the service offered to our customers, any trends in complaints and comments are followed up and if necessary changes in training or policy are implemented. We take complaints seriously, we want to give our customers the best service we can.

Our policy of 'treating customers fairly' is regularly reviewed, if any problems are traced to a branch or individual, these are dealt with accordingly.

 

if anyone has a problem, contact me, we will try to help!

 

Regards

 

Alasdair

Link to post
Share on other sites

The sentiments are very admirable Alasdair, we will trust you are a man of your word.

Ultimately it is the company that suffers from poor staff procedures and when trust is lost, it is very hard to get back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff #9-SAYS IT ALL.

The hinmist two posts from Alasdair Craig@AC, appeals for disgruntled customers to contact him. Thats a bit queer as he hasn't tried to sort out a complaint sent him about six or seven weeks ago, or so i am led to understand. In this case where the complaint would need Clark to either lose MONEY or do a bit of graft for the punter they have gone back to their old ways of stonewalling the punter. Again conniff in another post-leopard and spots. What Clarks need to understand is that in this day and age the informed punters will not tolerate stonewalling which will not make the problem go away but only puts the punters back up. I know of at least one punter who is taking legal advice at the moment because their complaint is not being listened to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Alasdair is true to his word and that of AC then he might like to say why they have an inability to look into Scaniamans problems. It only needs a proper technical investigation to say yes or no, something which the aftersales service seem incapable of.

 

I'll challenge Alasdair here.

 

Prove openly that scaniamans problems were correctly looked at, something they and the manufacturer seem to have difficulty with. If he can sort this one out then he can put the hairdrier away.

 

The reality is that AC are only interested in sales (aren't we all) and that when it comes to aftersales, I would alledge, are incompetent, amateurs and on a par with some Disney charateurs yet pupport to be professional.

 

Professional??? I doubt it and it's a wonder how the hell AC got a customer service award. Unless of course it's linked to advertising spend. ?

If they are that good then why all the complaints?

 

Quite outrageous in the real world.

 

Sir Arnold needs to do a bit more me thinks and take these issues on board, something which seems to have been convinienty ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

one of the T&Cs in clarks service plans is that it is not transferrable to a new owner of the car.

You would think that a firm so focused on marketing would realise that if the plan was transferred to a (LUCKY) non clark customer, it would get them through the door for servicing then the sales vultures would get a go at otherwise unlikely punters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. Heliosuk,Thank you very much for "Throwing down the Gauntlet" to Alisdair Craig on my behalf. I really do appreciate that.

However, I thought you would have more sense, given that they have had over a year to verify my complaints.

Do you honestly expect people of Clark,s calibre to cross swords with someone with your experience in engine technology.

Alisdair is obviously cherry picking the complaints to tackle since he has not replied to your challenge. Out of their depth on this one???? or afraid of TS?

I am beginning to think that this is another one for the Sunday News Papers.

Edited by scaniaman
dippit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Scaniaman, Sir Alasdair hardly seems to be the Sir Lancelot of the Sir Arnold Clark kingdom does he. Perhaps he is more the Sir Percival Smoothie-Smoothie of Robert Bolts Baron Bollingrew which is worth a good read anyway and seemingly quite apt with AC.

 

The point is that despite frequent requests, the Kingdom of AC seem blinded by the Dragons of the Baron "The Computer Is Always Right" and if Baron computer says there is no fault, there is no fault.

 

However, as most of the professional engineers in this field know, it it possible that fault codes can be masked by software gliches, electronic tolerance stacks, let alone mechanical ones and the only way to prove it is to go back to basics and check leak off rates etc.

 

Unfortunately, Sir AC seems to employ Serfs who are incapable of realising this or even carrying out these basic checks necessary to confirm or deny that an issue exists.

 

I reckon it's more a case that Sir AC does not have competent staff to deal with the issue and as regards TS, well they would have to set up a quango just to understand the issue.

 

One thing for everyone to watch though is the current vulnerability of these DPF's to play up along with their associated paraphanalia. Generally they work well but go outside of the test procedures and boy does it get expensive to put right if it goes wrong and I would alledge the diagnostics and the people who have to fix them are not up to par as "it costs too much to train them".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

oops i'm really sorry i never got back to you on this 1 :(

 

Well as you have probibaly guessed by my lack of posting i got this sorted to my satisfaction.

 

My second warranty service will be carried out free of charge.

 

Well i have a letter from customer services stating that i will get the service free and i have to present the letter to the garage

to recieve the service free, hopfully all will go well when its due in 8 moths time.

 

I see from reading the above posts that not everyone is happy with Arnold Clark customer services,

i can only comment from my own experience and say i would rather deal with the customer service department than the Arnold Clark garage i bought the car from.

 

I can only appologies for how long it's taken me to get back and thanks for all the help and advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Well Silverfoxy you maybe got your service OK'd but your car will be lucky to get a lick and a promise. When i put my car in for it's last service, i enquired if they took the wheels off as part of the service. This question was prompted by my local garage who had problems removing wheels off cars over 3years old which had previously been main dealer serviced. Clarks said that the wheels did come off (brake work). When i took the car in i left a tin of copper grease and told them i wanted this put on all moving brake components and wheel bolts.

Obviously, when i collected the car i couldn't check if this had been done, but i know that they did not change the brake fluid as per Citroen service instructions.---another sad story.

Last week the car went for first MOT and got an advisory on a sticking brake. I took car to local garage for repair and they informed me that the brakes were partially seized and no copper grease had been used. This begs the question "how many Clark serviced cars are running around with faulty brakes???????????"

The mechanic told me that nearly all main dealers don't remove brake pads and clean mating surfaces, assembling with a heat resistant lubricant----and yet cars do 12,500mls between services???????? This is criminal, moreso on cars where servicing is two yearly.

From now on the cars that me and my extended family own, will be serviced by a proper garage who we can trust to do the job properly, and not how an accountant thinks they can get away with doing the very minimum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...