Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Default - Experian Credit Report


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5003 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I was wondering if you could help me. My boyfriend and I are about to apply for a mortgage so i checked my credit report and a recent entry has been added. It relates to a Barclays loan showing as a default. I have previously requested a copy of a signed CCA which they did not provide. It is detailed in the link below:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/216812-barclays-resolve-loan-2.html

 

I am now in the position where i have the account suddenly turn up on my credit report (previously this account had never been reported to a CRA. I've emailed Experian to ask them to remove it but just wondered if anyone has any suggestions, as i'd like to try and resolve this as soon as possible so i can get a mortgage.

 

Can i challenge Barclays on data protection grounds as opposed to unenforceability or is the only option to clear the debt somehow and have it showing as settled? Does a settled default account look bad to lenders? All other accounts on my record are perfect with not so much as a late payment.

 

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

championless

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

From what I understand and I'm pretty sure others can back me up on this. Defaults remain on your credit file for 6 years regardless of them being marked as satisfied. Unfortunately the very presence of a default on your credit file has substanial negative effects on your score for the duration of it being on your file.

 

The only hope you have is writing to Barclays to ask them to remove it but you will have to have valid grounds for them to do so. The fact they cant produce a CCA maybe an option. But dont expect any quick fix. It can take many months to force a company to remove a default from your file. All I can advice is be persistant and have a read of this link http://www.learnmoney.co.uk/credit-file/remove_default_notice.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debtsucks is right it will stay for 6 years, while a settled default is better than an unpaid one lenders view them exactly the same.

 

Was it a previous loan you had or something?

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it was a loan. Can I argue that the default was placed in error because my account was in dispute at the time? I know they don't have a copy of my original credit agreement but all they do is suggest I contact FOS. Will this do anything useful? They've told me they would only remove the default if it was put on in error. What can I do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you actually have a dispute in?

 

The following is taken from the lending code but only refers to the amount been owed been disputed, not disputed in general

 

35. Subscribers can give CRAs default information about a customer’s debts if:

• the customer has fallen behind with their payments

• the amount owed is not being disputed by the customer; and

• the customer has not made a proposal that satisfies the subscriber for repaying the debt following the subscriber’s formal demand

 

As for the CCA request, they cannot enforce the debt unless they take you to court but can record it with the CRA's and carry out collection activity if they wish.

 

I personally would start by SAR them which should include the agreement and alleged default notice.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks James, that's helpful.

 

I had a dispute in the fact that i requested a signed agreement and they would not provide one other than a blank one.

 

The CRA have come back to me today saying that Barclays will not remove the default. Barclays have also come back to me themselves following my offer of full & final settlement on the proviso that they remove the default and have suggested that they would only do so if it was added in error. Can i challenge it on me not receiving the default notice? Or if they provide proof it was sent, is that considered proof that i received it?

 

Or can i make a complaint to the information commissioners office, following the subject access request, that they do not have the right to process my data in such a way?

 

Just wondering what the next step is after the SAR?

 

Your help would be really appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the CCA they are allowed to send you a copy of an agreement as long as it contains the same terms and conditions as the original. They have fulfilled their request by sending you this.

 

Like i said they cannot enforce the agreement unless they take you to court but can still register info with the CRA's.

 

The SAR will show everything they have on you and should include the default notice. If not you need to ask them where it as and request they send you a copy.

 

I have read various posts that courts have accepted templates of default notices and records of them been sent as proof but i disagree with this as you cannot identify if the default is perscribed correctly. Anyone can say they have sent something if there is no proof otherwise. I do not beleive the courts should accept hear say.

 

Try the SAR then take it from there. There is no quick fix and it takes time but can be worth it in the long run.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

They didn't register the account with any CRA. However, once they issued the default, the account suddenly registered with experianlink3.gif.

 

I've just had a thought though. The account numbers don't match up. The original account number is now different to the one listed on the default notice. AND a different sort code. Is this relevant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah as it has to be exact.

 

The account they have issued a default on needs to be the account noted on the notice.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply ask them which account the default notice refers to as it clearly is not yours.

 

See how they answer that!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would give it a go ask them to explain which account the default notice refers to as it clearly is not yours.

 

The incorrect details make the default notice ineligible and it should not be on your credit file.

  • Haha 1

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need to write along the lines of:

 

I am writing with regards to the default entry you have placed on my credit file dated xxxx and the default notice dated xxxx.

 

Please confirm which account the one listed on the notice refers to as i am unable to match it any of my accounts.

 

I would also like to refer to the 4th principle of the Data Protection Act that personal data shall be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date.

As this default notice does not relate to any account i have had with Barclays you are in breach of the Data Protection Act by adding the entry to my credit file.

 

Please provide me with a full explanation and remove this entry from my file within the next 14 days otherwise i will issue proceedings against you for breach of the Data Protection Act.

 

Something along those lines. Dont expect instant action from them but its a start and they are going to have to explain why the account number on the notice does not relate to any of your accounts.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking i might send the SAR first, to see if they have a copy of the default before i say that i have one? What do you think?

 

Won't they just remove it and then reissue a default? Or do you think i should send the above letter first?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would subject access request them get all the information you need on them but you can still send the letter aswell as the bottom line is it is incorrect and shouldnt be placed on your file.

 

I beleive they can re-issue a correct notice if it is within a certain time period but if they did this just pay off the outstanding balance if you can within the period they give you. Then the matter would be resolved and your credit file clear.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really it will have been on the application form but it does not matter whether notice was given or consent obtained when it comes to registering default information.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've received information back from Barclays following my SAR. I've received:

 

8 Fiched sheets of figures relating to the account from Jun 05 - Oct 08 (At the bottom of this it states account closed and the balance shows zero. It says this exactly "STMT Produced 13 Oct 08, Reason - Account Closed, STMT SHTS 00007 to 00007,Central 2nd Cl, STMT Addr - As per a/c heading")

 

A blank 'form of agreement' as shown earlier in the thread

 

AND Statement information relating to the account number i don't recognise.

 

It looks like that at some point in Oct 08, they decided to change my account number and sort code without telling me. I also sent the letter suggested above about the account numbers not matching up. I sent this to the data exceptions team. They sent me a letter stating that they could not deal with my case and referred it to retail banking customer services (who have since said it will take until at least 1st June to get back to me, can they do that if i asked them to remove the data from my report within 14 days?)

 

But that's all that was sent. Shouldn't they have sent me more than this? Like a copy of the supposed default? Notes on the computer systems that they hold about me, etc?

 

Any suggestions about next steps?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...