Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Brick Driver V's Lloyds TSB


Brick Driver
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Following on from this thread I sent off the Prelim letter on 17th August. This morning, 24th August, I recieved what looks to be a generic reply letter and a "how to voice your concerns" leaflet signed by Mr Andrew Palmer. Contents of the letter are as follows:-

 

Dear Mr & Mrs Brick Driver,

 

I am just writing to let you know the we've received your complaint and to say how sorry I am to learn that you're unhappy with us.

 

You have my assurance that one of our assistant managers will investigte the concerns you have raised with us - this may take a little time but I would expect out enquiries to be complete within the coming two weeks. We will then be able to respond in full to your complaint and ath that stage, I hope, resolve matters between us.

 

In case you haven't received a copy of our leflet called "How to voice your concerns" I've enclosed one with my letter. This tells you all you need to know about resolving your complaint with us.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Andrew Palmer

Customer Service Advisor

 

Is this generic letter aimed to stall me by informing me that it will take a few weeks to investigate hoping that I will go away and fotget about it or is this a genuine letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. This is the standard letter they normally send out just to acknowledge the receipt of your prelim. We sent our prelims on 9th August and had received exactly the same letter as you have by 11th - so a lot quicker than you've received yours. Today we've received our 'the answer's no' letter - exactly 14 days after they got our prelims.

 

Good luck. :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck!

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have again recieved a letter from Lloyds TSB Collections Department telling me that "It would appear that this account is currently a low priority to you". The cheeky buggers. I feel that my account is of a low prority to Lloyds TSB!

 

In LBA I asked for £235 to be refunded because when I last called Lloyds they told me that on the 1st September there would be more charges taken out of my account which I added to my claim.

 

This letter that I received today does not contain any of these charges and having checked my account online it appears that they havenot taken them either.

 

So do I remove these from my schedule of charges or carry on with the ammount I am claiming (£235)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send a letter - I believe the Collections Centre is in Brighton BN1 4BE - as they can (and do!) claim not to have received any contact from you.

Angie

 

Claim issued 7.7.06

Judgement entered against LTSB 8.8.06

Enforcement action issued 29.8.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. I have drafted up this letter to send. What do you all think?

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I received you letter dated 31st August 2006 (ref: CHHXXXX). I find the following comment made by yourselves to be one of ignorance and arrogance:-

 

“It would appear that this account is a low priority to you”.

 

As you should be aware, I have informed you that this account is in dispute with regards to unlawful charges levied by Lloyds TSB on a number of occasions. Please take this as a further reminder.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

 

 

Mr B Driver

Link to post
Share on other sites

HEY BRICK DRIVER I'M AT THE SAME STAGE AS YOU WITH LLOYDS MY LBA WAS SENT ON THE 01/09 I'M STILL WAITING FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THOUGH. THAT LETTER YOU DRAFTED SOUNDS GOOD I SHOULD HAVE SENT SOMETHING LIKE THAT! ALL OF THE STANDARD RESPONSES YOU HAVE HAD SEEM SOOOO FAMILIAR! I RECEIVED THE “It would appear that this account is a low priority to you” LETTER TOO IT MADE ME LAUGH, CHEEKY SODS.

HAVE YOU OPENED A PARACHUTE ACCOUNT?

GOOD LUCK DONNA X

Subject Access sent - 28/06/068)

Prelim Sent - 22/07/06:roll:

Standard Bog Off received - 03/08/2006:mad:

LBA sent - 07/08/06

Expiry of LBA - 21st Aug No reply as of yet so

Moneyclaim issued - 01/09/2006:lol: ( I even gave them an extra 10 days before issuing claim! ) THE SWINES!

Notice of issue received 11/09/2006

Acknowledgement of service received 13/09/06

28 DAYS & COUNTING!

Total Claim - £3,966.04 inc Interest

Lloyds Platinum Visa Subject access sent 11/06/2006

 

"All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy"

"Whoever said money can't buy happiness simply didn't know where to go shopping"

"We didn't actually overspend our budget. The allocation simply fell short of our expenditure."

"Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination."

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have different accounts with several banks. The Lloyds account is just a basic cash account so is no major loss if they close it.

 

You would think that they would have taken note what with the ammount of people claiming back these charges. Oh well, fingers crossed for the both of us eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

We addressed our N1s to Customer Recovery Centre in Birmingham (I'd imagine that's where your 'the answer's no' letters have ocme from. We've recently received acknowledgement of Service through from SC&M so there obviously weren't any problems using that address.

 

Good luck. Lucid :)

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

*Won unconditionally with contractual interest (29.85% compounded)

Lucid's Account - £749.62 * Joint Account - £2019.64 * Mindzai's Account - £595.65

*All settled in full - 6/2/07

*Hearings - 7/2/07

*Prelims sent - 9/8/06

_______

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...