Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Student loan over payment


Welshie1984
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5106 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was ill over the Christmas period with a reoccuring health problem with my urinary tract. I attended uni up untill the 14 december or something around that, and handed in my one essay around that time.

 

We then had a 7 inches of snow in the first week i was meant to be back, so i emailed the tutor to let her know i couldnt even get out of my street, with no reply.

 

The next week i then fell ill with a kidney infection, and saw a consultant.

 

I received a letter from Council tax saying my tutor informed them i left my course on the 14th, and also the student loans company.

 

I received my Grant on the 5th Janurary, and spent it on books and a computer, i also repaired my car as it was on and off the road and wasnt too reliable.

 

I had every intention of going back to uni when my illness cleared up, and i handed in my essays on time, but it appears i got kicked out the same week i handed in a 3000 word essay, ridiculous!:|

 

I have today received a letter from the student loans company stating i must repay over £1600 in full for the over payment due to me withdrawing from the course on the 14??

 

any advice would be very appreciated, as i don't have a job yet as finding one seems to be near impossible:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello Welshie,

 

It sounds absolutely terrible how you have been treated by your university.

 

I am not aware of any university in the United Kingdom that has a statute in it’s association documents that would take a student out of the university on the grounds that you have described. Indeed, most universities are willing to move heaven and earth to keep you on a course.

 

It appears that the university believed that you had given up on the course when you have not. Did you take any action to remedy this situation? Also, it appears that you have been very badly treated by tutor who has lied to university with regard to your situation.

 

You may have remedies against the university for removing you from the course without following the due procedure.

 

In respect of the student loan, you are liable to pay back the £1600 in full as this is an over repayment and the conditions of the loan clearly state that her payment must be made in the circumstances. I’m sorry I do not have any better news for you in this regard.

 

In respect of repaying the amount, the Student Loans Company can be quite forceful when they want repayment of the amount. Therefore, I would suggest, that you write a letter to them stating the complete circumstances surrounding your ejection from the university and that you make clear that you are not in a position to make payment in full at this time.

 

You should offer them a reasonable amount that you can afford to be paid per month. I would stress, if you have no assets and their job, you also inform them of this in the letter. Also, when you’re writing the letter, I would suggest that you place a paragraph in there stating when your circumstances improve you will settle the debt in full. Do you not have any of the loan left over?

 

For the amount you owe the SLC, I cannot see them taking you to court, however you never know. If this does happen that you have various remedies available to you in terms of repaying the loan. The court will generally not ask or force you to pay an amount that you do not have and you will be allowed to pay in instalments, according to your means.

 

All the best of luck looking for a job and I hope things improve for you very soon!

Always seek professional legal advice and be careful of the cowboys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...