Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep let us have a good laugh eh from today’s Telegraph 🤣😂🤣 the rest must try harder    Farage won Friday’s election debate, a poll finds Nigel Farage won Friday night’s seven-way BBC election debate, according to a poll.  A snap poll of 1,031 voters by More in Common found most thought Mr Farage won the debate, followed by Angela Rayner. Mr Farage received 25 per cent of the vote while Ms Rayner received 19 per cent. The Green Party’s Carla Denyer was the third most popular with 11 per cent, Stephen Flynn for SNP received 10 per cent and Penny Mordaunt, the leader of the House of Commons, took 7 per cent of the vote. Daisy Cooper, the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru’s Rhun ap Iorwerth took 5 per cent and 2  per cent respectively. The debate saw Britain’s main seven political parties clash ahead of the general election on July 4.  Mr Farage, who returned to frontline politics for Reform this week and is standing as an MP in Clacton, challenged his political rivals on immigration and net zero policies.
    • Hi CAG Team, I'm seeking your skills and help for a NtK my partner received through the post earlier this week. To give a little backstory, my partner and I, along with our young children (4 and 7), decided to go on a camping holiday about 3 hours away from us. We took a car each because we didn't have enough room in one car. We arrived at the services at very similar times as we followed each other the whole way. So, two cars. My partner has received this NtK, but I haven't. This NtK dropped through the front door on Wednesday, June 5, 2024.  We both parked in the Burger King car park, not in BP; we got out, all went for a toilet break, got some food from the BP garage and returned to our cars to eat.  After eating, we took the kids to the toilet again before leaving to complete our journey. I didn't notice any parking restriction signs and can't get back to the location due to how far away it is. I noticed another person had an issue here and reported it to you, and they managed to get the fine dropped. See below. To me, it looks like they have cameras at the complex's entrance and exit. I'm not sure if they own the land/car park by Burger King, so I'm not sure if this is a legal contract or not.  I find that 30 mins limit at a Services that serves hot food to be ridiculous and unfair, especially as we had kids to feed and water.  And the fact that I didn't receive the same NtK despite us driving in and out together is just crazy. This is the location - I also uploaded a map image. Google Maps MAPS.APP.GOO.GL ★★★☆☆ · Restaurant   1 Date of the infringement 24th May 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 29th May 2024   3 Date received 5th June 2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y - Only entering and exiting the complex/land.   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N   7 Who is the parking company? MET   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] BP Blue Boys, Tonbridge TN12 7HE   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA Anyway, I hope you can help me out with some guidance on how to proceed with this. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Passerby0233 2024-06-08 13_17_52-Burger King - Google Maps — Mozilla Firefox.pdf NtK_29-05-2024.compressed.pdf
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre (Northampton) Name of the Claimant ? PRA Group (UK) Limited How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 23/5/24 AOS - Tues, 11/6/24 (19 days)  Defence - Thurs, 25/6/24 (33 days) Particulars of Claim 1. The Claimant claims the sum of £7926 for an outstanding debt owed. 2. On 20/4/18 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank for a Credit Card under reference [16 numbers]. 3. On 10/5/22 the Defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £7296. 4. On 28/11/23 the debt of £7296 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited, who itself assigned the debt to PRA Group UK Portfolios Ltd on 30/12/23. Notices of assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925. The Claimant has instructed PRA Group (UK) to act on its behalf and the CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £7925 What is the total value of the claim? £8481 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Yes Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? I believe I sent a letter by registered mail of a change in address to abroad in 2021. Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not personally - probably sent to my parents Why did you cease payments? Unable to afford, living abroad What was the date of your last payment? Unsure (probably 2021) Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No ................... I have read through a number of similar threads, one thing i'm not sure how to proceed about is that I live abroad in the middle east and have done for several years. The claim letter was sent to my parents address and I really don't want them to be harassed about this. I am sure I sent the original creditor a registered letter with my change of address but can't find this currently. I am not in a position to pay this, and tend to come back to the UK to see family at most once a year (less since Covid),  not particular bothered about my financial score...more concerned about harassment of my parents. I have not registered on the gov gateway or anything like that.  Details below (as best as i can), and thank you for taking the time to look into it. Also redacted claim form attached: Claim form 23-5-24.pdf
    • While we wait for someone to explain how farage is any better than sunak  .. if not worse   One of many likely upcoming belly laughs   Reform chairman Richard Tice has accused the Tories of (reform like) “dirty tricks” after one of his party’s candidates withdrew his papers to stand at the last minute and endorsed former cabinet minister Sir Gavin Williamson. In a dramatic final 24 hours before nominations closed there had been fevered speculation that as many as six Tory MPs and other candidates could defect to Reform after Nigel Farage decided to stand in Clacton and become leader. But instead no Tories switched and Tom Wellings, the Reform candidate for the new seat of Stone, Great Wryly and Penkridge in Staffordshire, quit and put out a statement endorsing Sir Gavin.   Who does he think he is an Anderson, a Carswell !!! was heard at the reform HQ pub ... as Candidate brushed aside by Farage in clacton to run as an independent    Tice accuses Tories of ‘dirty tricks’ to persuade Reform candidates to stand down WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: A furious row has broken out after a Reform candidate’s last minute defection to the Tories   :ROFL  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Plz point in right direction- site soooo big now!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5124 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Im taking control of my finances myself after trying with cccs since April 09 and need some advice or a point to the right letters.

 

Last January I sent off CCA requests for 5 of my creditors. Braclaycard, Tesco & Nat west CC came back only with terms and conditions and Tesco and Nat West even had the wrong name in the information they sent. (numpties)

 

Anyway I decided to try the DMP and although it was crippling I managed. However in january this year I split from my partner and have now decided to do it all on my own (dont have his money to rely on anymore). So far I have managed to get all of my other creditors (except for the bank accounts) to accept my offers so I feel a bit more in control than I did before.

 

Anyway to cut to the crunch I now want to dispute the accounts.

 

Where shall I get a letter to do this (considering they sent me the terms and conditions) and not a signed CCA (in any shape or form) I cant seem to find it on here although i have seen it before and I have looked in the letter templates.

Please advise asap.....as I need to get letters off today.....as I have received letters saying that they will pass on to DCA's as they are now asking for full balances of the accounts.

 

Thanx in advance- Blossom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit this to suit;

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

This account is in Dispute .

 

On xx/xx/2009 I wrote to xxxxxxxxx requesting that xxxxxxx supply me a true copy of the executed credit agreement for this account.

In response to this request I was supplied a mere application form which did not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The document sent purporting to be a credit agreement does not contain any of the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required. Suffice to say none of the terms are present in the document

 

Since this document does not contain the required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3) consumer Credit Act 1974, which states

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This situation is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

In addition should you continue to pursue me for this debt you will be in breach of the OFT guidelines, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on debt collection

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I refer to page 5 of the guidance which states;

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment.

 

I require you to produce a compliant copy of my credit agreement to confirm I am liable to you or any organisation, which you represent for this alleged debt, if you cannot do so I require written clarification that this is the case. Should you ignore this request I will report you to the Office of Fair Trading to consider your suitability to hold a credit licence in addition to a complaint to Trading Standards, as you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40

 

Since the agreement is unenforceable and the default notice is non compliant, it would be in everyone’s interest to consider the matter closed and for your client to write the debt off. I suggest you give serious consideration to this as any attempt of litigation will be vigorously defended and I will counter claim for all quantifiable damages

 

I respectfully request a response to this letter in 14 days

 

 

I trust this out lines the situation

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have sent off account in dispute letters to Barclaycard, Tesco & Nat west. I have also sent of CCA requests to Nat west for 2 bank accounts that I have with them. (They initially refused my offers of payment that I have pro rata'd from using the spreadsheet on Cag) Then 1 week later they said that they would accept the offer. Crikey I wish they would make up their minds!

 

Anyway I have written back to them as they did not state if they would freeze the interest on the account so for another measure I also requested a copy of both accounts CCA with the £1 postal order.

I have seen threads where it is stated that cca's dont apply to overdrafts but this doesnt seem very cut and dried.

 

I will keep this threwad updated and would appreciate anyone in the knows input in due course. Thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hi all- advice needed

 

I have had letters back from all creditors for Tesco. Nat West & Barclaycard

 

Tesco have sent me a letter saying they have fulfilled their side of the bargain by sending me a copy of terms and conditions and also a 'true' copy of what i would have signed at the time. They have advised me to go to CAB as they will pursue the debt if i continue to doubt the veracity of what they have told me so far. blah blah blah...... They do not have a signed copy of the agreement!

 

Nat West have sent me the exact same letter although they could only provide me with a signed application form and of course with totally the wrong name on a further letter stating the card number only and the credit limit.

 

Barclaycard have gone one step further and sent a letter stating they have cancelled my repayment arrangement (the one I had with CCCS) and have now brought in Mercers. Who have started to call. Crikey didnt even understand half the words she said. I advised her I was writing to them and would only communicate in future through written correspondence. She seemed ok with that and hung up. Barclaycard do not have a signed copy of an agreement either.

 

So what do I do now! Please point me in the right direction again folks......Thanx Blossom x

Link to post
Share on other sites

okidoke! The letter from Mercers does state that I have til 23rd April to make a payment and if i dont they will make a formal demand and they will register with credit reference agencies. Can they still do that if BC already defaulted me......seems a bit odd. But I get your drift I will await the next round. Thanks again cerberusalert......:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All...Sorry been a while I havent had access to a scanner but would really appreciate advice on the following. There have been a few developments :confused:

 

Mercers contacted me on April 6th as stated above with a default notice stating

 

Default notice under section 87(i) of the CCAct 1974

They procedded to state that they act as agents etc and that i was behind with payments. They then said that I shoudl pay minimum payment by 23rd April 2010. then they contimued to state what action can be taken against me etc.

 

On may 5th I received a 2nd letter from Mercers stating that they will pass my account to a local debt collector who may call at home for full repayment. Apprently they are confident that we can resolve the problem.

 

On May 27th I received a letter from Barclaycard referring to Section 78 of the CCA 1974. They have stated that they must supply me with a copy of my executed agreement and a statement of account which is practicable to refer (blah blah blah!) They then stated Please note a copy of your current Barclaycard Credit Agreement will be sent under separate cover.

 

Withn ref to CPR we have provided you with sufficient info to allow you to understand our position. The CPR does not confer an automatic entitlement to documents before proceedings start. CPR 31.16 provides that a party may apply to the court for pre-action disclosure in certain ltd circumstances, which do not apply here. The application must be supported by evidence and the usual order is for the applicant to pay the costs of the application, including the respondents costs, together with the respondents costs of complying with any order that is made as a result CPR 48.1(2)

They continue to state they have provided me with the contractual terms under which my financial obligations arise and a statement of account. They then state that if i dont keep up my payments they will register a default against you. Durrrr! havent they already ??? and Mercers??? I thought you could only have 1 default....

 

they have attached a copy of BC terms and conditions.

 

Now I am presuming they are just trying to confuse me with jargon. I know there wont be an agreement available. the card was over 20years old. So what do I do now???? and who do I respond to....Mercers or Bcard? And who the ek will these local debt collectors be? I have had phone calls from Moorcroft recently but have ignored them or told them that I will only communicate in writing and well this dca is dealing with a RBS card that there was no agreement for....im going to start a new thread for this one I think....but tbqh..its the same sort of situation...So plz help blossom before she hits the blossom hill. lol;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the date that the Default Notice was sent?

I thought you could only have 1 default....
They can only register one default.
I know there wont be an agreement available.
Without an agreement they cannot enforce.

 

Send them this; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for quick response again cerberusalert!

 

Just been through all documentation. The default was sent April 6th 2010.

 

Bcard have sent the same letter this week that I had in Feb 2009. I am confident that there is no cca too....

 

I will send them the letter. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

A court would assume that a default notice was sent 2nd class unless they can prove otherwise which means they allow four working days for service, add the fourteen days to remedy and the date should be the 24th April so the DN would be deemed one day short.

 

Did you keep the envelope?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt keep the envelope but Im learning.:( I sent a dispute letter to barclaycard though on March 21st 2010. so surely Mercers shouldnt have issued a default on this account? So I am assumin I clould argue that they remove it.... after they receive the letter I have just composed!!!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I am assumin I clould argue that they remove it....
You could but I wouldn't because if they terminate your a/c on the back of a defective default notice they would only then be legally entitled to any arrears not the full amount as they would have 'unlawfully rescinded' the agreement.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...