Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can the settlement method be requested?


Number6
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6494 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm sure this must have been asked before but I can't find any related threads so sorry if I missed it.

 

It seems that LTSB (or their solicitors) always apply the condition that the refund is paid into the account from which the charges were taken. Fair enough..., sort of, I thought originally.

 

Has anyone successfully challenged this condition and got a refund by cheque?

 

The reason I ask is that since my claim went in LTSB have already taken more charges from the account so by the time I actually get the refund most of the surplus that could otherwise be put to useful purpose (like paying some bills) will be eaten up by the subsequently applied charges.

 

So I would then have to start a new claim cycle to reclaim the new charges that were applied thus wasting more of my time.

 

However, if my refund was by cheque then I could pay that into a "clean" account and issue a cheque from there into the LTSB account to cover the charges originally claimed; I could then "debate" with LTSB about the subsequent charges whilst having the full benefit of the refund in the meantime.

 

So has anyone got settlement by cheque? If so did it take much persuasion to get it?

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends, to some extent, on the condition of the account. Many claims are made against accounts which are already closed. In such a case the bank has no option but to send a cheque.

 

If an account has a debit balance greater than the charges refund, then you would expect the bank try to offset the debt by paying the refund into the account.

 

As to additional charges, when the bank eventually send you a conditional offer, which they surely will, you can suggest acceptance on the basis that they include the more recent charges in the settlement, thus saving everybody time and money. Failing this you will immediately issue a further claim. Many people who have tried this method have been successful.

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

When (if) the conditional offer arrives it should be for approx £1500 more than the overdrawn balance was at the time of the claim. The problem is that by the time the offer is made and accepted by me then LTSB will have taken in the order of a further £1000 in charges so if it's paid into the account I'll only get £500 in my pocket (provided of course I can withdraw it before they slap on even more charges!!). So if they won't agree to include the latest charges and interest in the settlement I'll be right back to square one and have to start the whole claim cycle again and wait another three months or whatever.

 

Whereas if I can persuade them to give me a cheque then I'm quite happy to pay back the overdraft as it was at the time of the claim and leave them to stew over the rest.

 

I suppose a lot hinges on how far I'm prepared to risk things by pushing them hard.

 

I just wondered if anyone else has tried to get a cheque and if so how did they fare?

 

Pete

I will not make any deals with you. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. Number 6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey, Pete, they are being particularly unpleasant to you, aren't they?:o

As they are playing hard ball with you, it's time to play hard ball with them.

 

Provided that you can afford another court fee, why not start another claim now, without preliminaries. That way, when you reach offer stage, they will see that you mean business and, hopefully, agree to settle the lot.

 

Otherwise I don't see them willingly offering a cheque. Would you?

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pete. I have a similar probem with recently applied charges. I have just written to them saying I will not discuss settlement unless they do include the charges taken in the last six weeks.(£300) My reckoning is they'll either agree to include them as per my demand or will see me in court which, quite frankly, I would welcome...however scary, as there is no way on this earth any judge would tell them it was ok to charge me £35 for bouncing a £1.99 charity direct debit! Taking a leaf out of mjanet's book and standing my ground. Also remembering that for the first time ever...it's me wearing the trousers! Good luck! Saj x

SEE MY THREAD HERE...http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/7358-saj-lloyds-tsb.html

Data Protection Act letter sent recorded delivery 15.5.06

Compliance 1.06.06

PAR letter sent recorded delivery 7.06.06

1st denial received 13/6/06

LBA letter sent recorded delivery 21.06.06 (received 22/6)

Moneyclaim filed 7/7/06, Served 15/7/06

Allocation questionaire returned 28/8/06

Court date 1st December :lol:

SETTLED UNCONDITIONALLY IN FULL 5.10.06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...