Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBOS Loan mystery!!


foxyflugel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yes it is in the ICO all the data is their about keeping records,what needs to be done on this occasion is foxy needs to write a letter of complaint explaining to the information commissioner ,the documents she has requested are not forthcoming and between rbs and triton they are trying to frustrate your access to all data they hold including any possible data in any other account ie a router account..she need nt bother the ICO with any details of the case just her request for information is being refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pebsham, Patrick and DD for replying to my post.

 

Pebsham - sorry for the confusion, if I can just clarify.

 

Basically, when OH took the loan out he had a current account with RBS also (this is when the first payments bounced). He was the defaulted in Sep/Oct 2005 and this is when it got sent to collections dept. We then opened up a joint a/c at Natwest and he wanted to pay weekly from this straight into his RBS loan account. They said he could not close his RBS current a/c as this had to be left open to service the loan. They agreed that he would pay weekly into his RBS current a/c and they would transfer over the monies into his loan a/c - sorted - or so we thought.

 

It wasn't until he received the letter (some nearly 3 years later) saying his loan was £6568 (I think from memory) in arrears that it came to light. He never received a statement of account (either on his loan or c/a) in all this time.

 

The duplicate loan stat they have sent seems very odd to me.

 

It says 2007 - 21 sep - balance £15763.20

 

then 2008 - 21 Jan - unscheduled credit £7159.47 (this was from current a/c)

 

2008 - 7 March - unscheduled credit £260.00(also from curr a/c)

 

then 11 March £50

18 March £50 etc etc

until 20 may 2008

at the bottom of the page in the total paid in box it says £7969.47

 

So this is what the fig is made up of Pebsham.

 

Also, it is my belief that when they offered the £300 settlement figure initially, they then witheld the monies from the a/c to make it look like he had taken them up on their offer. When I called Triton at the beg of Jan 2010 they said that no payments had gone to the loan a/c since beg of Dec 2009 - they had left his a/c at Natwest!! This would make it roughly £300 witheld and then applied at the beginning of Jan 2010. He received no letter to say that it was closed or paid in full.

 

Also on the arrears letters from Triton I noticed that it said

 

HIREP LOAN BALANCE

INSTANT ACCESS SAVINGS A/C BALANCE

INTEREST PAYING CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE

 

What does HIREP mean????????????????

 

Also on the default notice of 19 sep 2005 it says

 

total amount now outstanding £15763.20

Rebate allowable (if any) £3687.19

Net amount outstanding 12076.01

 

Also I noticed that the reference/ account numbers differ on the original loan and also on the arrears letters from Triton.

 

He took the loan out at 7.9% APR they said it was and it is actually a flat rate loan.

 

Sorry to throw more figures at you but this just gets more confusing - what are they hiding?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

it seems it was triton who were witholding monies without passing it back to rbs until they were caught out...i think whats happened here is that extra interest and charges were added becuase of triton witholding the monies ie the 7000 plus and eventually when it was queried triton has paid it over but penalties have arrived at the door that should nt have happened this is why both triton and the bank are trying to withold information and are deliberately trying to frustrate any claim,perhaps they are thinking along the lines of statute barred and also it does not look like the contract loan has been consolidated in the correct fashion hence no contrac is available...imo

patrickq1

 

Hi Patrick and many thanks once again for your valued response.

 

The £7k was paid into his current account at RBS and they were the ones who failed to transfer it to his loan a/c. They assured me that there was no default as a result of this (I have it in writing). They said initially that he could not pay straight into his loan a/c!!

 

The witheld monies have occured in Dec 2009 and Jan 2010. Being the £300 which I believe they have used - so as to look like he has taken them up on the early settlement figure offer of £300 - which they wouldn't put in writing!!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Foxy, thanks for all your time taken to clarify for the thick ( me) amongst us.

 

I really would like you as soon as poss to check Mr Foxyflugel's credit record to see what's on that.

 

I think a letter to both RBS data controller and Triton explaining that you are not satisfied with their response since you know they have more info, (contracts, statements, router accounts and anything else you can think of). Explain that you have written to ICO.

 

If you still get no joy from RBS / Triton a letter before action to seek to recover your believed overpayment. (We'll arrive at a consensus figure on here). The letter should explian that you will seek to recover charges taken "in error" but you need information that they are withholding. Bear in mind in civil court you only have to show balance of probability not absolute proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol - thanks Pebsham - don't think it's you that's thick - I was just unclear in the figures I stated.:lol:

 

This is sooooo frustrating - but my worry now is that it will be statute barred before they start to play ball - but i've got until May 2011 so hopefully that will be long enough. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it's actually called a "Subject Access Request" and whilst the information commisioner's office states that all computer information held on you must be provided it also allows for some paper information dependent upon how and why the information is stored.

 

 

Anyway back to the actual business at hand. Since Triton / RBS have stated that the debt is repaid I would request the information that shows the account closure since this must be held by them.

 

Can anybody point me to any legislation that would mean contract information must be kept past the end of the relationship.

 

Could Foxy not sue RBS for sight of the contract / statements etc since she believes that she may be owed substantial amounts due to errors on the part of a large corporation?

 

i THINK i am right in saying that as the contract has ended the only way you would get information relating to the agreement now would be by starting a legal action and then through general disclosure or through special directions

 

yes faux pas there- meant to say that a SAR is a request for INFORMATION they hold about you (not for copies of documents)

 

BTW - no offence intended

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol - thanks Pebsham - don't think it's you that's thick - I was just unclear in the figures I stated.:lol:

 

This is sooooo frustrating - but my worry now is that it will be statute barred before they start to play ball - but i've got until May 2011 so hopefully that will be long enough. :D

 

Don't worry too much about "statute barred" it's entirely possible to go past the "6 years" since you were prevented finding out the situation by the bank's unprofessional behaviour. Likewise monies overpaid by yourselves wouldn't necessarily be seen by a judge as a gift under the circumstances you have described.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is why a letter needs to be written to the information commisioner and just put it that they are being very unco operative and are refusing to divulge information as you have reason to beleive they have and are trying to conceal the fact that their has bee an act of gross administration to your detrement..

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

• Analyse the usage of dates in the Hirep system, analyse the impact of not converting parts of the system to be Y2K compliant.

• Transformation design, code changes, system and integration testing.

Edited by patrickq1
Link to post
Share on other sites

it is possible it could mean your data has been by the looks of things adjusted to some extent ,possibly they thought they were clear of the the whole affair and may possibly have re issued different data to what you think you have and what they think they have ,hence the term hirep data adjustment hope you can understand that and if it has gone to rbs and telford then we all know what happens their they may have boosted figures or altered the data ...so it needs the complaints going in to who ive already said to complain to... hope that makes some sort of sense to you

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understood Patrick;-)

 

BTW the Triton morons get worse. OH received an arrears letter today! Interestingly enough though - the loan a/c doesn't appear on the list - apparently he is in arrears by £50.38 :confused: They have listed his c/a and savings a/c - both of which have small credit balances on them. However, they have added a line saying - all a/cs held may not be listed above!! Absolute eejits :rolleyes:

 

Will get the comaplint off asap Patrick - and once again thanks for all your help - it is much appreciated. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont worry about the letter they have just sent it is probably designed to promote a rant from you just ignore it and number it in your itemeised filing system as you will need to make a full itimised account of everything day to day as it happens just send the complaint letters in and sit back and wait eventually they will have to come up with an account for all of this and when it does you will then feel vindicated

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HI,

 

I have a loan mystery going on myself! Loan was taken out about 15 years ago and about 10 years ago was stupid and never paid for a year, so it went from £4000 to about £12000 and passed to titan. I have been paying £200 a month on this loan for over 10 years now which makes me sick to my stomach, intrest was over 30% so i was not even covering the intrest. I have had meeting with my current bank who offered me a loan to settle this and clear it once and for all and actually be able to pay it off in 6 years. So was very happy thinking all i had to do was call get a figure and get it paid! Not so easy it turns out, they only have one current account in my name in £3371 credit, which is very strange since i was not covering intrest.

Two xmas's ago my payments were returned to me and when i called was told i had wrong details, loan was not paid off and was still around £12000 and the payments they sent me back had to be paid back so i was not in arrears.

So after speaking to about 10 different people today who were very vary in giving me any details really,they said they need to look into it and calculate the balance and will call me back in a few days?? also this makes no sense to me either as your balance should be your balance....whats to calculate????? i asked woman on phone what i should do and they advised to stop making payments, i asked for a letter or email to clarify what she was saying and she would not do so, just leave a note on my account. All just seems very strange to me and dont know what to do. If my payments have been going to the wrong account for 1 1/2 years surely the bank would have contacted me or i would have had someone at my door.....really dont understand all this, feel like for the past 10 years i have been ripped off completley. Also i have done a credit check with experian and no outstanding debt is on my credit recoreds....does not sound right either!!!!!

Since account is so old and when younger was a bit silly i have no documentation regarding this loan at all!!!

 

Any help PLEASE :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

 

I have a loan mystery going on myself! Loan was taken out about 15 years ago and about 10 years ago was stupid and never paid for a year, so it went from £4000 to about £12000 and passed to titan. I have been paying £200 a month on this loan for over 10 years now which makes me sick to my stomach, intrest was over 30% so i was not even covering the intrest. I have had meeting with my current bank who offered me a loan to settle this and clear it once and for all and actually be able to pay it off in 6 years. So was very happy thinking all i had to do was call get a figure and get it paid! Not so easy it turns out, they only have one current account in my name in £3371 credit, which is very strange since i was not covering intrest.

Two xmas's ago my payments were returned to me and when i called was told i had wrong details, loan was not paid off and was still around £12000 and the payments they sent me back had to be paid back so i was not in arrears.

So after speaking to about 10 different people today who were very vary in giving me any details really,they said they need to look into it and calculate the balance and will call me back in a few days?? also this makes no sense to me either as your balance should be your balance....whats to calculate????? i asked woman on phone what i should do and they advised to stop making payments, i asked for a letter or email to clarify what she was saying and she would not do so, just leave a note on my account. All just seems very strange to me and dont know what to do. If my payments have been going to the wrong account for 1 1/2 years surely the bank would have contacted me or i would have had someone at my door.....really dont understand all this, feel like for the past 10 years i have been ripped off completley. Also i have done a credit check with experian and no outstanding debt is on my credit recoreds....does not sound right either!!!!!

Since account is so old and when younger was a bit silly i have no documentation regarding this loan at all!!!

 

Any help PLEASE :)

 

Who was the original loan with?

 

I've PMd you

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

OH received yet another letter from triton morons today saying his account is in arrears (but listing only a current and savings account - which both have credit balances on them). Also says that all accounts may not be listed as there are too many!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Where do I send the complaint to (mentioned in previous post) and what do I say? Is there a template for this??

 

I would like to send this tommorow if poss - please - any help would be very much appreciated. Cheers in advance. :-)

 

EDIT TO ADD - Just noticed on the account balances stated current a/c £50.29cr savings account £0.09 - this adds up to exactly the same amount (£50.38) they say the account is in arrears - COINCIDENCE???

 

They also say that my OH cannot withdraw the money out of the account - WHY? It's in credit - any suggestions from the experinced and wise would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by foxyflugel
additional info
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi foxy...i hope you have opened up another bank account elsewhere and use this as a parachute account,until all this is sorted out,like you say they dont seem to know their ass from their elbow...triton you are better to send them a letter requesting them to send all data concerning your OH this will be the SAR ,and then when you have pinned down what is what your complaint should now concentrate on RBS and their strange accounting system bordering on fraudulent accounting ,so i hope you get some answers.

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...