Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • out of the blue text and email from J&P asking me to make contact regarding ref number.   Plan to adopt same tactic as for last 12 years with CW&D, IRDWW, IDR etc  
    • Spoke to legal which turned out to be the court processing the claim all they could recommend was filling in the plea online and gave me an email so I could attach proof of DD being in place. So going back to DVLA to see if I can get any further explaining what has happened 
    • It would just be good to get a few more opinions on the judges decision before I decide whether to push on with it or stop if there's every chance I will lose and owe them more in legal costs
    • America is a republic, (and) not a democracy - not quite there yet   Trump is a corrupt felon, not a president - yep
    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wheres the money gone ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5265 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please can someone explain where all the money collected by the councils for parking fines that was to be used for road maintenance has gone ? We are told that fines pay for this so why are the councils whining about the cost of gritting and potholes , perhaps the fines should be increased .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can someone explain where all the money collected by the councils for parking fines that was to be used for road maintenance has gone ? We are told that fines pay for this so why are the councils whining about the cost of gritting and potholes , perhaps the fines should be increased .

 

If you knew how much it cost to maintain the roads you would realise the contribution towards it from parking fines is a drop in the ocean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When water gets in cracks in the road and freezes it expands causing the road to break up. For cold weather the Council obviously allows for an average amount of bad weather with a contingency for emegencies but prolonged bad weather has to come out of Council reserve funds. If you bring Parking revenue in to the equation obviously during this period income from both paid for parking and fines is minimal and staff still need to be paid which add to the burden on an already tight budget.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When water gets in cracks in the road and freezes it expands causing the road to break up. For cold weather the Council obviously allows for an average amount of bad weather with a contingency for emegencies but prolonged bad weather has to come out of Council reserve funds. If you bring Parking revenue in to the equation obviously during this period income from both paid for parking and fines is minimal and staff still need to be paid which add to the burden on an already tight budget.

 

I was told that the reason potholes 'pop' was that contractors no longer use Hot tar to seal the infill , as was the case in days of old.

You know and i know from previous chats that some councils make substantial profits from parking revenue . If those councils were to be short of grit or whine about potholes with their expanded cash sums that would be in excusable IMO .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can someone explain where all the money collected by the councils for parking fines that was to be used for road maintenance has gone ? We are told that fines pay for this so why are the councils whining about the cost of gritting and potholes , perhaps the fines should be increased .

 

If you write to your local council they will give you figures as to how much revenue they gain from parking and where it is spent.

 

To be honest, it won't change anything except satisfy your curiosity.

 

Trouble is, lots of people have, for years now, been quite against any rises in taxtation, and begrudged paying tax at all. Yet they also want super public services. It will take a really radical shift in government priorities to change the situation, and that's not likely in the near future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told that the reason potholes 'pop' was that contractors no longer use Hot tar to seal the infill , as was the case in days of old.

You know and i know from previous chats that some councils make substantial profits from parking revenue . If those councils were to be short of grit or whine about potholes with their expanded cash sums that would be in excusable IMO .

 

The vast majority of Councils don't make a noticeable profit from parking many barely break even. Usually the figures quoted are income which as most people with half a brain would realise is not the same. I live in Surrey and along with 99 other local authorities make an operating loss on parking. Iin 2007/08 Surrey in fact lost £776,000 before capital expenditure and £2,012,000 if you include capital expenditure as they see parking as a service. Strangely these figures are not usually in the papers as they would probably not sell as many copies as 'millions fined by thieving Councils'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The vast majority of Councils don't make a noticeable profit from parking many barely break even. Usually the figures quoted are income which as most people with half a brain would realise is not the same. I live in Surrey and along with 99 other local authorities make an operating loss on parking. Iin 2007/08 Surrey in fact lost £776,000 before capital expenditure and £2,012,000 if you include capital expenditure as they see parking as a service. Strangely these figures are not usually in the papers as they would probably not sell as many copies as 'millions fined by thieving Councils'.

 

Thats why I said 'some' councils , mostly the London ones make massive profits e.g,Westminster , Camden , Hammersmith and Fulham and a Surrey one Richmond ,just some examples , they have no excuses as we well know .

Edited by noddyaccount
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Road Fund License fee should cover it with cash to spare but of course Brown and his motley crew need it to cover their expenses

 

Totally ridiculous statement when you consider how much is spent on roads, as an example just to widen the M25 at jct 10 in 2007 cost £75 million. There are 240,000 miles of local roads. You would need around 180,000 tonnes of salt to grit them all once (assuming a rate of 0.75 tonnes per mile). As it costs in the region of £25-£30 per tonne of salt, it would therefore cost around £5m to grit all the roads once and £15m to grit them three times. Currently, councils only grit around 40% of local roads (96,000 miles) during severe weather. It would therefore cost £1.8m to grit all 96,000 miles once.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally ridiculous statement when you consider how much is spent on roads, as an example just to widen the M25 at jct 10 in 2007 cost £75 million. There are 240,000 miles of local roads. You would need around 180,000 tonnes of salt to grit them all once (assuming a rate of 0.75 tonnes per mile). As it costs in the region of £25-£30 per tonne of salt, it would therefore cost around £5m to grit all the roads once and £15m to grit them three times. Currently, councils only grit around 40% of local roads (96,000 miles) during severe weather. It would therefore cost £1.8m to grit all 96,000 miles once.

 

Westmiser council alone made 90 million pounds from parking last year , more than enough .

Think of the savings to the economy as a whole , lost productivity etc, lost wages , lost parking revenue to the councils themselves , not to mention the cost in lives and injuries.

It is a short sighted false economy , from the people who are meant to serve us , not themselves , the public servants have been at their masters drinks cabinets again .

Edited by noddyaccount
Link to post
Share on other sites

Westmiser council alone made 90 million pounds from parking last year , more than enough .

Think of the savings to the economy as a whole , lost productivity etc, lost wages , lost parking revenue to the councils themselves , not to mention the cost in lives and injuries.

It is a short sighted false economy , from the people who are meant to serve us , not themselves , the public servants have been at their masters drinks cabinets again .

 

I don't think Westminster will be sending money to Barnsley to pay for gritting somehow. Its curious how Westminster is always trotted out as an 'example' of how much Councils make from parking when its location and use make it far from typical. I'm sure Councils are aware of the loss to the economy but I doubt if they enable Sainsbury etc to open they will get anything from Sainsbury to pay for the grit. You obviously have no understanding of how Councils are funded, I'm sure when Libraries, Schools, Social care are all cut next year because you've blown the entire budget on two weeks gritting you would reconsider your point of view. In order to grit all roads rather than just main roads would cost an additional £425 million do you really want that on your Council tax bill? Most accidents are from pedestrians falling over which has nothing to do with gritting roads and to grit footways would cost £600 million. I'm sure if your Council tax bill goes up 25% you will be happy because you know you could still drive to the shops in the snow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Westminster will be sending money to Barnsley to pay for gritting somehow. Its curious how Westminster is always trotted out as an 'example' of how much Councils make from parking when its location and use make it far from typical. I'm sure Councils are aware of the loss to the economy but I doubt if they enable Sainsbury etc to open they will get anything from Sainsbury to pay for the grit. You obviously have no understanding of how Councils are funded, I'm sure when Libraries, Schools, Social care are all cut next year because you've blown the entire budget on two weeks gritting you would reconsider your point of view. In order to grit all roads rather than just main roads would cost an additional £425 million do you really want that on your Council tax bill? Most accidents are from pedestrians falling over which has nothing to do with gritting roads and to grit footways would cost £600 million. I'm sure if your Council tax bill goes up 25% you will be happy because you know you could still drive to the shops in the snow.

 

£ 425 million a year , not taking into account council parking excess would be less than £50/year per household . Losses to the ecomomy are much more than that , maybe central Govt should cover any shortfall .

As for the Council funding i advocate a cull of management types or target pathfinders as I imagine they are called , press officers and other overpaid executives a.s.a.p . Why do hospitals , sorry health trusts whatever the imagineers call them today{sack them too } , need press officers for example , are Doctors not able to talk . Sack all 'spin doctors' {paid liars}, I am sorry if you come into any of the above categories , but not very much .

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there are no "management types" who will buy the grit, ensure it is delivered, ensure that the gritters are ready to go at the right time, ensure that the gritting has been done, and deal with the no-win-no-fee lawyers when the injury claims for people slipping over start coming in.

 

Yes, get rid of press officers. My company are currently under siege because the press officer said something that the company experts told them not to say :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there are no "management types" who will buy the grit, ensure it is delivered, ensure that the gritters are ready to go at the right time, ensure that the gritting has been done, and deal with the no-win-no-fee lawyers when the injury claims for people slipping over start coming in.

 

Yes, get rid of press officers. My company are currently under siege because the press officer said something that the company experts told them not to say :rolleyes:

Keep the managers in the old true sense of the word , absolutely , people who lead preferably by example and even better who have come up through the ranks and know the work they are directing . I meant get rid of the quangocrats , performance junkies and fast track graduate graspers out to make their bones .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey up lad, barnsla az spent loads on its brass gettin its lines a sign reight, but if tha guz to co-op i penistone them bayz ant painted reight on't rooad, same es them isdabled bays darn frum t'arnall.We ad jcb art yisterday on old goods yard, ar cant mak me mind up if 'wor fer safti or sozs the cud get the brass in ont park wots tha recon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey up lad, barnsla az spent loads on its brass gettin its lines a sign reight, but if tha guz to co-op i penistone them bayz ant painted reight on't rooad, same es them isdabled bays darn frum t'arnall.We ad jcb art yisterday on old goods yard, ar cant mak me mind up if 'wor fer safti or sozs the cud get the brass in ont park wots tha recon?

 

Penistone every time , I think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...