Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Payday loan strategy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5239 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I was made redundant from a well paying job several months ago, and have struggled to get back into full-time employment (a matter that should change in the next month or two).

 

Since redundancy, I put in a claim for benefit, which was unfairly disallowed, and I had no income and no resources for several months, and debts, arrears and charges spiralled around me. This culminated in my bank closing my facilities and registering a default.

 

Last week the benefit decision was overruled on appeal, which has given me a small lump of backdated money with which I need to appease as many debtors as possible.

 

A few months ago, in desperation and without any cash, I took a Payday loan for £750 with The Money Shop in order to pay my utility bill and buy food and provisions. This was done via a number of guaranteed cheques drawn on the account that later went into default.

 

On the first month anniversary, I extended the loan via a £112.50 payment from my own bank debit card. On the second month, I extended again via a £112.50 payment from my wife's bank debit card, as mine was then in default.

 

On the third month anniversary, mid-November, I didn't have any funds to extend the loan, and The Money Shop wouldn't discuss the matter and told me they would present the cheques.

 

So I let it happen ... I was powerless to do anything else.

 

A fraud investigation company working on behalf of the bank contacted me, and I sent them a letter confirming that the cheques had been written (but not dated, as is the style with The Money Shop) prior to the default on the account. This seemed to appease them, and they said it wasn't the first time they'd encountered such a matter.

 

Then my ex-bank contacted me, and I explained the situation. They pointed out that it was illegal to present cheques when there wasn't sufficient money to cover them, to which I retorted that surely everyone using a payday loan does it for exactly that purpose! I didn't foresee current difficulties when taking out the initial loan. They said that they would not be honouring the cheques, and would return them to The Money Shop.

 

The Money Shop head office then contacted me and asked what I was going to do. I asked them to give me a few days to consider my position (I am waiting for receipt of an element of the backdated benefit).

 

In the meantime, they have (without permission) taken a £112.50 payment, plus additional payments of £25 and £50 (charges?), from my wife's debit card that I had used in the second month.

 

Separately, I also have around £900 in arrears on my vehicle HP agreement, which I must try to keep going until the expiry of the contract in March 2010 when I can offload the car at a guaranteed value. If they move to repossess beforehand, I will get only market value for the car, and a huge negative-equity bill. As I have missed a payment on a restructured repayment plan, they are seeking repayment of the full arrears.

 

So my difficulty is in what to do. The funds available will not cover both the Money Shop initial capital and the HP arrears. I think the HP company might be the more flexible to a partial payment, but the risk is much higher (several £1000 in negative equity) if they're not.

 

Ideally the bank would have honoured the cheques and added them to my default, which I am sorting out separately, but that's clearly not going to happen.

 

Could someone please advise on the strength of my position with The Money Shop, and what they might be prepared to do? I'm not mighty keen on paying £112.50 each month until I can repay the capital sum, but I fear this is what I probably have to do. However, knowing that the cheques will not be honoured, I imagine they too will be after full repayment.

 

Thanks, Lamp

 

Note: I am not trying to deny the debt, just to find the cost-effective and lowest risk repayment strategy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lamps

 

Not straight forward with the money shop once they have your cheques as most banks will always pay a guaranteed cheque. The short term answer is a new bank account to protect your income. You would of course incur charges with your old bank. You mention old bank so perhaps already done?

 

I am not sure they have authority to keep 'dipping' in to your wifes account, has she signed anything ? - if not then I would suggest she contacts ber bank and to go down the fraud route. Maybe worth explaing to money shop what they have done and give them the chance to give it back. She does need to report card lost and get a fresh one that they can't access.

 

As for the car finance I can't really advise. Perhaps worth another post on the general debtforum as this sort of thing crops up on there all the time.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your wife needs to cancel her card right away. I would have a word with her bank, because I'm not at all convinced that this is legal and if that is the case the bank should be able to regain the money on a charge back.

 

I pay my friends Sky bill using my debit card all the time (she does give me the money first, haha!!), but that doesn't mean that her Sky bill, which is in her name, is suddenly my financial responsibility and they can take what they like from my account.

 

As far as setting up a payment plan with the MS, the golden rule is pay by standing order only. Write to them detailing what you can afford to pay, stick to your guns and don't let them bully you. Don't talk to them on the phone, unless you record your calls (actually, I would say just don't talk to them on the phone period - they'll only try to bully you into paying more than you can afford). They probably won't agree at first, but once they see that they're not going to get the full amount out of you in one hit, they will eventually give in.

 

If they continually phone you, send them the phone harassment letter in the "templates" section on here.

 

I not an expert on the HP side of things, but I am sure that I have read on here that if you have paid more than 2/3 of the amount owing on a car, they can't repossess? I'm sorry, I might have that totally wrong, but I would look around the "Repossession" section of the forum and see if there is anything else in there that might apply to your situation.

 

Please keep your chin up, and try not to lose any more sleep than you have already. You've had a rotten time of it already, these people have no right to make things worse when all you are trying to do is repay what you owe.

 

All the best, keep us posted.

 

MsW

Edited by MsWeatherwax
Spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks RobJam and MsW for your replies!

 

Yes I've opened a new bank account (and will certainly not allow the Money Shop to get the details!), and the previous one is in default, yet their "solicitors" readily agreed to £50pcm repayment pending my re-employment, which in itself is a result as I was previously paying £280pcm to service the loan.

 

Also, I'm not seeking advice on the car HP. I believe each party's rights in the contract are clear to me, including the impact of early termination of the contract. I have not yet paid 50% of the value for a simple termination of the agreement as allowed for in the Consumer Credit Act, as the HP includes a large final installment which is just less than 50% of the financed amount, however I have paid more than 33% so the hirer cannot repossess without a court order. Shortfall losses are only covered by the hirer at the end of the agreement, hence I need to keep it going until March 2010 to avoid a negative equity situation and a bill for the shortfall. This is a bigger issue than The Money Shop, and the one I am trying to tackle first. If I am successful in negotiations, they might accept a payment which only partially clears the arrears and agree to defer or spread the balance.

 

The real question relates to The Money Shop, and what success I might have with them in agreeing some repayment outside of the monthly £112.50 carry-over charge. If I end up paying a chunk of my lump to the car HP, I cannot clear the £750 capital owing to the Money Shop as well.

1) is there a precedent to them accepting some alternative repayment method, given that the original agreement must be void as the cheques have been returned?

2) do they tend to seek a court judgement - I'd be quite prepared to voice opinion in front of a judge if they fail to accept a reasonable proposal.

3) how were they allowed to take unauthorised debit card payments from my wife's account? This means that they must have stored the CVV on their system, which I also thought was naughty. (note: I'll ask her bank for a new card!)

4) I can't find the T&Cs for my "cash til payday" agreement with them - are there any copies on the internet?

 

Thanks again

Lamp

Link to post
Share on other sites

... just out of interest, are the original bank within their rights to return guaranteed cheques because they are drawn on a defaulted account?

 

There stance is that I acted fraudulently because the cheque date is after the account went into default. However, I wrote the cheques prior to the account going into default, but omitted the date as required by the payday loan company. It was the loan company therefore that inserted the date prior to cashing the cheques.

 

I only ask as it would be the easiest solution for the bank to honour the cheques and add to the total default sum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

3) how were they allowed to take unauthorised debit card payments from my wife's account? This means that they must have stored the CVV on their system, which I also thought was naughty. (note: I'll ask her bank for a new card!)

 

Hi Lamp - I'm really sorry for never getting back to you on this one, I missed your post somehow.

 

Did you have any joy getting this refunded? I'm not an expert by any means, but I really believe this to be fraudulent. I can't see how they can just use someone else's account to claim funds just because they feel like it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lamplighter

 

I am new

 

I can answer the question in relation to you car if you are 1/3 or have paid have the finance on your car then the finance company will need to get a return of goods or from the court so Ms weatherwax is right they wont just repossess it. I hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...