Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You may have noticed that we have gone to the trouble of restructuring your posts to make them readable. I had to do it twice now.  My site team colleague has done it once. Posting long blocks of text make it very difficult for people to read especially using telephones. It discourages people who might want to help you. Please can you make your posts properly spaced and punctuated. Thank you
    • Thank you, I was been told that it’s a serious crime if I shoplifted above £200, (this time £500, I gave the thing back+ last time probably also around £500 which I didn’t give back).. and I admitted to them that I sold those things at very low price to pay for food and stuff.   That’s why I was worried..as it wasn’t my first time.. I also did it in John Lewis in the city I live, but when they asked me I said I didn’t steal things from it as I don’t wanna get caught in my city. But I don’t know when they upload my pics in the system will they recognise me and think of me a professional shoplifter than against me… so what happened about the fraud was that what there was a phone call told me that my visa has problems etc due to I helped bad people do money laundering etc. I said I didn’t then they tried to ‘control’ me and many things happened to make me believe what they said… as soon as I gave them the bank details I lost all the money in it. 
    • Thank you. I would also like to thank the contributors to this thread. Particularly dx100uk for his/her? Support 👍
    • Hello again. Thank you for the update, I'm sure you will offer hope to other people with the same problem. HB
    • Hello I would be really grateful if you could give me your guidance please regarding a Notice to Keeper I received requesting payment of £100.00 for parking. The driver of the vehicle parked in Starbucks for a period of 38 minutes, thinking that there was 1 hour free parking according to the signage. They did not leave the Starbucks area of the car park to visit McDonalds. Starbucks was closed at the time so they were not able to purchase anything from Starbucks, which was the intention. Today is the last day to make the payment of £60.00 but I am reluctant to make the payment as I feel it is a total scam.  I would welcome your guidance and advice for next steps. Thank You   (I haven't added any copies of the NTK as I was not sure if it should be shared at this point?)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default help please


HL123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5274 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

CAG newbie here looking for some help please! This might end up being long so I'll apologise in advance :oops:

 

I decided to get a copy of my Equifax credit report today, and what a shock that was! In 2007, there are serious mortgage arrears and a default of almost £18,000 from a secured loan on a property I used to own with my ex. We split up in 2005 and I moved to Scotland, he stayed while we tried to sell the house. It took two years to sell (it needed major refurbishment - hence the secured loan), and during this time he told me he was paying the mortgage and loan every month, and even emailed me his bank statements a few times to 'prove it' (obviously now I know these were doctored!). I'd set up a mail redirect to my new address and written to the lenders telling them I'd moved out, but I didn't get any letters from them about the arrears, so I had no reason to doubt him. I know that both the mortgage and the loan were settled when the house was finally sold in August 2007, but looking at my credit report I can see he was already 6 months behind with the payments at that point. Luckily the mortgage didn't default, however the secured loan (different lender) did default. The balance on this loan was almost £18,000.

 

I know I can't do anything about the arrears showing on my file, as the accounts were in joint names and it's my own stupid fault for not checking my ex was actually paying them like he said. But I have two issues with the default - firstly, it is still showing as an outstanding balance, and hasn't been marked as satisfied. As the loan was secured on the house, it's impossible for it to still be outstanding. Secondly, the default date is the 31st August, but the property was sold on the 24th! The mortgage was paid off at the same time as the secured loan and my report shows that was settled on the 29th (I'm assuming the solicitor paid by cheque and it took a few days to clear), and I can only presume that the loan company received their cheque at the same time. So I don't understand how they could add a default on the 31st, knowing the property had already been sold and payment had been issued to them.

 

I've emailed Equifax asking for the default to be removed and the account to be shown as satisfied, but what are my chances of this actually happening? I don't have any information about the loan as my ex had all the documents and it was 4 years ago that I left - I don't even have an account number. Is it worth writing to them with just my name and previous address to see if they can find the info? It worries me that they still have it listed as an outstanding balance, in case they try to chase me for it!

 

Is it even worth pursuing it? Even if they remove the default, the account would still show as 6 months in arrears, so I'm presuming my credit rating is still going to be ruined until it comes off in 2013. Apart from these things, my credit history is perfect, so it's really annoying that I'm stuck with these bad marks against me because of an idiot ex boyfriend. I was wondering why I was (very embarrassingly) turned down for a car loan recently, and now I know why!

 

Do you ever just wish you'd never bothered looking?!!! :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...