Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All I know this a long shot but ha anyone got any advice please? Nearly three years ago (maybe more) my ex took a contract out for a new phone for my birthday that I ended up paying the bills on (lovely present huh) I have always paid the bill for this. The phone number that I have had for most of my adult life was passed over to this contract and I am old now haha We are now divorced and have not been in contact  - he is abusive and I have nothing to do with him. I cannot enter into any dialogue with him whatsoever. I have continued with my phone contract and number etc but am stuck - I have no access to my bills even though they come out of my account - as the contract is in his name I cannot get a pac code to move therefore I will lose my number if I cancel- sky just quote data protection at me which I get but this is soooo frustrating!!!! I know that the sensible thing would have been to just l cancel the dd lose the number get another contract elsewhere and get over myself and move on but I am just asking out there as a final desperate attempt - can anything whatsoever be done??? Thank you in advance :)
    • What's your intent, or interest? I can't see that you have any cause of action regarding bills issued by one third party to another third party. Is the idea to use this as a lever "I'll denounce you to HMRC unless you do blah blah .." That might in fact have no teeth anyway, HMRC will aware of the company's turnover via their other tax affairs.  As a matter of fact a company buying VAT rated supplies and selling to VAT registered customers is actually worse off if not VAT registered themselves. Has your court case reached it's conclusion yet?
    • Hello, welcome to CAG.  I expect people will be along to advise later. We aren't here to mock, this is a serious forum. If you feel you're being picked on  report the relevant post to the site team.  Best, HB
    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Newbie ......... In Desperate Need Of Advice Please !!!


joella68
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:confused: hello all, firstly i would like to say what a wonderful site this is ;)

 

well im posting on behalf of my mum, who very stupidly has been running away from a repossession for roughly 12+ years now, she thought that back in 2002 it was all over asshe recieved a letter saying that if she could prove that she was on sick benefit they would scrap the debt, she called on the services of C.A.B, and never heard any more so assumed it was all dealt with, but last week recieved a letter asking her for around £32,000 she is frantic with worry and does know where to turn as it starts to get very complicated now as in the last year she recieved an inheritance .........this inheritance is invested now, as she has around £5,000 in the bank, she is worried that they will take tis money from her, she us 64 years old and about to retire,

please, please can anyone advise on this ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

i assume this is for property

 

we have a repossesions forum

 

i'll get it moved to there for you

 

sorry not my game

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I profess to knowing very little about reposessions or mortgage shortfalls and the like, just how long ago did the debt occur?

Has any payment been made on it?

 

Bit more info if you please. Was the property repossessed?

Was there a charging order?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Repossessions Forum ;)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply silverfox, the debt was from 12+ years ago, yes it was repossessed, no there was not a charging order as far as my mother has told me, but citizens advice did have some correspondence with the building society about 7 years ago now, and my mum has a letter from them saying that a payment of £10 per month was offered, she does not remember agreeing that with citizens advice, and no further replies have been recieved until last week.........7 years on !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I do know this. If the debt is from a mortgage shortfall then a 12 year limitation applies meaning that if no payment has been made in the last 12 years then it is Statute Barred. If that is the case with you, I would get them to prove their claim. That's about the level of my knowledge I'm afraid

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention, as well as the 12 year limit, if you have not acknowledged the debt in the same period the SB also applies

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep agree with that.

 

and its also for them to prove it is not statute barred, not for you to prove it IS.

 

sounds like you should be ok.

 

if you have no paperwork etc to refer too, it might come to sending them an SAR

but if its a DCA chasing you, then i would not bother .

 

who is the OC and who is chasing?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OC is original creditor

DCA is debt collection agency.

 

basically WHO is chasing you?

 

as for the £10 offer, unless your mother actually signed a letter saying yes i will pay this or any other letter saying 'yes i owe you £XXX' then that does not count.

 

it must be written & signed acknowledgement of the debt, or a financial transaction within the last 12yrs & once it has been statuted NOTHING can unstatute it!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that dx, right it is the britania building society that are chasing her, there has been no finacial transaction at all, i phoned the britania the other day on her behalf did not give any names and asked them how long they can chase and they told me there was no time limit to it !

Link to post
Share on other sites

statute barred me thinks quite clearly then.

 

as i said not my game, [repro's]

 

no time limit...hehe muppets.

 

just as an outside thought.

 

have checked your mothers CRA file?

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys thanks for your response so far, we think this statute barred is not applicable because mother has a letter saying that they would accept £10 per month that citizens advice must have offered..........but she does not remember giving authority for them to do that

 

do you give signed permission for c a b to act on your behalf when enlisting their help ?

 

she has aked c a b to give her all correspondence but they say that they dont keep files after 6 years so have nothing now as they helped with this in 2002,

 

she is affraid to go to the bs for a Subject Access Request in case this all opens a huge can of worms

she is wondering how they found her address too.

she is very ill and stressed over all this which she thought was many years behind her.

 

please any further help would be fantastic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I can understand your mum's reluctance to send for the SAR, but it really is the only way to get the right information to fight their claim. If you don't do anything they will keep on pressing for payment and may even issue a court claim. Either way you need to know what you're dealing with.

 

You should send the SAR by recorded delivery and keep a copy and receipt for posting. You also need to print off the signed for receipt from the royalmail website. Enclose a postal order for £10 (not a cheque as it will have account details on it) with the letter. On the back of the postal order write "fee for Subject Access Request only - not to be used as payment" then take a photocopy of both the front and back of the postal order and keep safe with the letter and proof of delivery.

 

When you get the information back, let us know what is in it and we can advise further.

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ell-enn so much, i understand this is the best way forward for her she is just so scared now and thought this was all over years ago, and like i said a pensioner now so this is a terrible place for her to be, and as mentioned before is worried she will loose her inheritence too, which is basically all she has to see her through the rest of her life.

 

thanks again

 

joella68

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to get her to be positive about the situation. Even if it did go to court (unlikely) after all this time I think the judge would want to know why the lender has waited 12 years to chase the money.

 

I know someone who was in a similar position and the lender stopped chasing after they asked for an SAR.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well this is what i cant understand .......... why if they believe that they have a chance have they not taken it to court before ? but i think that its little comfort to her at the moment, she is so angry with heself that she went to citizens advice 7 years ago because she thinks that them offering the bs £10 per month was admission on her part, which would not make it statute barred right ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

also i should mention that they sent a leter through c a b saying that if she proved she was on sick benefit they would review her in 12 and 24 months and if nothing changed re her being on sick benefit within that time they would close the file..........she recieved this letter from them in 2001, she did prove that, then in 2002 they came after her again which is why she involved c a b, thats when they ofered this £10 per month payment...........but no payment has actually ever been made, then here we are 7 years later, chasing her again after no contact ! poor mum :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets see what comes back in the SAR. There might be no formal record of the CAB offer if they haven't actually got a letter signed by your mum. We'll cross all bridges when we come to them.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is something you could use if need be. Just send the SAR and see what comes back :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ell-enn so much, i understand this is the best way forward for her she is just so scared now and thought this was all over years ago, and like i said a pensioner now so this is a terrible place for her to be, and as mentioned before is worried she will loose her inheritence too, which is basically all she has to see her through the rest of her life.

 

thanks again

 

joella68

 

as you have guessed, if they COULD have taken her to court before they would have done so.

 

pers, i would totally ignore them.

there is obviously nothing they can do to her, its prob just a redundant A/C flag auto letter.

 

if you really must send anything i'd send the statute barred letter.

 

i also very much doubt they could produce the cab letters anyhow or have any record of them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you have guessed, if they COULD have taken her to court before they would have done so.

 

pers, i would totally ignore them.

there is obviously nothing they can do to her, its prob just a redundant A/C flag auto letter.

 

if you really must send anything i'd send the statute barred letter.

 

i also very much doubt they could produce the cab letters anyhow or have any record of them.

 

dx

 

Agreed :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...