Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Should I call Ruthbridge?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I received a letter today addressed to the occupier from Ruthbridge asking to be called immediately, I went strainght online and found out these are a debt collection agency.

I live in rented accomodation with a friend and we have been inundated with debt collectors/bailiffs etc. from the previous tenenats so it could well be to do with them. However, I too had debt from a Barclays and a LLoyds credit card when I was at university which I never paid for approximately £5k in total so I don't know if this is referring to me or to the previous tenants.

I understand that after 6 years my debt is statute barred as it was unsecured but I don't know for sure when I last made payments, my best guess would be that it was over 51/2 years ago but maybe not quite 6. I have not communicated with my creditors or made payments in this time.

I do not know if any CCJ have been issued and am too petrified to get a credit check done in case it flags me up.

So, my dilemma is should I call Ruthbridge and tackle this or should I just ignore the letter? all help gratefully recieved, I have been sick twice this morning with stress and have nobody to talk to about this.

Thanks

(By the way can bailiffs take my housemates possessions, I really don't want to get her involved with this)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter today addressed to the occupier from Ruthbridge asking to be called immediately,
Ignore it, if they want you they should address mail to you by name, they're fishing.

I understand that after 6 years my debt is statute barred as it was unsecured but I don't know for sure when I last made payments, my best guess would be that it was over 51/2 years ago but maybe not quite 6. I have not communicated with my creditors or made payments in this time.
If it does relate to this debt by the time you have sent the numerous letters demanding proof of the debt etc., the statute barred status will more than likely have kicked in anyway. ;)

I do not know if any CCJ have been issued and am too petrified to get a credit check done in case it flags me up.
You can check for yourself online for £8 CCJs, court orders & fines - Search yourself and others - Trust Online and DCAs will not know about you doing so.

(By the way can bailiffs take my housemates possessions, I really don't want to get her involved with this)
Certainly not, nether can they take yours without a court order & to do that there would have needed to have been a court order which you have failed to pay & if there was a court order you can easily get it set aside anyway.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!

 

Do not call Ruthbridge or any other debt collector - EVER. That's what they want you to do but you will be subjected to abuse and aggressive tactics to pay money for a debt you may not owe, are probably being overcharged for and or which they are likely not to have the proper documents. In addition you will never have a record of what was said and agreed.

 

If you get any more letters addressed to the previous tenant put them in a large envelope, possibly accompanied by some other promotional material, and pop into into the post without a stamp. The debt collectors will soon get the message that sending letters to your address will lead to excssive postage charges at their end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks, I won't call them. I guess I will just have to get on with it and ride it out - I have been reading on here and there is loads of help and advice so I will be strong and just tackle it if and when the need arises. It wouldn't be so bad if I lived alone but as I have a house mate I need to tell her about not calling them too which means admitting about my debt and I am so ashamed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a house mate I need to tell her about not calling them too which means admitting about my debt and I am so ashamed.
Being in debt is not shameful, although creditors would have us believe it is. :rolleyes:

 

It's a rare person who doesn't have debts of some sort & circumstances can change dramatically overnight as this present recession has proven to a lot of people who never thought they would ever get into financial straits. ;)

 

You'll probably find that your flatmate has problems of her own too, overdraft, credit card, student loan etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If these cretins are addressing letters to 'The Occupier', they clearly don't have a lot of information on you, do they?

 

Definitely IGNORE anything which is not addressed to you personally. If anything comes addressed to the previous tenant, just write "not known at this address" on the envelope and put it back in the red box.

 

Ruthbish are right at the bottom of the DCA food chain. They get the rubbish the others won't touch. They are extremely aggressive and rude on the telephone, because they know that such bullying is the only way they can ever get money out of people. Do NOT engage them on the telephone. EVER.

 

Bailiffs would be able to take YOUR possessions if you were taken to court, lost your case, and then failed to maintain the payments ordered by the court. Even in that case, they would NOT be able to take anyone else's possessions.

 

Your reluctance to get a credit check shows that you have a good understanding of how the system operates. You are very wise to think like this.

 

The old skeletons are best left in the cupboard unless they decide to emerge by themselves.

 

Try not to be made sick by Ruthbish. There is not the slightest shred of evidence that they have any information on you which represents a danger.

 

There is no need to reveal to your housemate that there may have been alleged debts in your past. As the letters are addressed to "The Occupier", they could easily be intended for the previous tenants.

 

SH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your help and advice - I hardly slept at all last night but feel better now reading your advice and replies. I have just spent an hour reading through other people's dealings with Ruthbridge and can see that they really are bully boys and I am more than smart enough to deal with them if it is me they are after.

I was wondering though if my debt isn't statute barred do they have to accept a repayment plan? I wouldn't be able to settle straight away but if I need to pay monthly I would do, perhaps it would be best to just wait and see if it ever got to court - my credit rating is knackered anyway and it wouldn't affect my job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering though if my debt isn't statute barred do they have to accept a repayment plan?
This is all hypothetical at the moment, you don't even know whether you are the person they are looking for. Besides, even if you were it is so close to being Statute Barred by the time you and they have gone through the formalities of exchanging letters and them providing proof of an enforceable debt, the Statute Barred status will have kicked in anyway. ;)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget that the letter was sent to the Occupier, it's only because you have debt in the past that you are taking the worry on board. Your housemate may well have been lying awake all night thinking it was hers too.

 

Do nothing at this point, ignore it. They haven't written to you, they've written to your address.

It's a steep learning curve....

 

Wendella 1 : RBS 0

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks - Normally I am such a level headed person but this has got me in a right two and eight.

 

 

Don't worry... just remember... NEVER speak to DCA's! and acknowedge NOTHING to them... most letters are Phishing letters to get a responce. If they write to YOU, then post up here and other experienced Caggers can give advice! :)

 

Stop worrying! I know it's hard not to, but if I worried about all mine, then I'd be dead with stress! :D

Edited by RW Fugitive
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks RW Fugitive - I will try not to worry. I just found an old statement showing I made a payment in Feb 2004 so it won't be statute barred yet - I don't know if I made any payments after that but I know I definately didn't make any post August 2004... how long can i eek the communication out for do you think if it is me they are after? I also remember i didn't pay a phone bill back in 2004 so it could be that too, I really don't know what on earth was going on with me then. Also I was wondering what will happen if I keep just ignoring the 'to the occupier' letters? Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you know u could always waste there time.

 

Ring them up from a pay phone and give them loads of abuse down the phone. Not only will it waste there time but it will make you feel better.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another 'to the occupier letter' :( - I wondered if anyone had any experience on what they tend to do after I don't reply to their letters. Should I be expecting an 'express delivery' package? I am so stressed about this but reassured by all the help that is available on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not be stressed by letters which only serve to illustrate how useless Ruthbish are and how little information they have. It is their money they are wasting by sending these phishing expeditions and not yours.

 

Eventually you will be able to forward these to the OFT, whose guidance states -

 

2.8

Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

a.

sending demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that

they are the debtor in question, for example, threatening debt recovery

action to 'the occupier' or sending a payment demand to all people sharing the same name/date of birth as a debtor in the hope that contact with the correct debtor will be made.

 

You could complain now, but I wouldn't. As you say there is a possibility that you have an alleged debt somewhere which is approaching statute barred status, I would do as little as possible for now. There will be a more propitious time in the future to turn the tables on Ruthbish.

 

SH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Scabhunter - I will listen to your advise carefully. I am reading a lot on what to do if and when this progresses and am sure with all the great help on here I can handle this. I wouldn't be so stressed about it all if it was with a more reputable company, but these do not sound like the sort of people I want to deal with!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...