Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

had this letter through today


emm4
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you for your letter of 3rd march addressed to the group chairman. i have been asked to respond on behalf of the bank.

 

Whilst i can apreciate that no one wishes to pay bank charges unnecessarily, i feel that i should point out that we do offer a free, full banking service to those customers who remain constantly in credit. however, we do ask those customers who overdraw or who do not have sufficient funds in their account as and when thier payments become due, to make a contribution towards our costs in maintining their account. these costs are quiet considerable. if for example, all of our customers conducted their business in accordance with the terms and conditions of their account, considerable savings could be made. As matters stand however, we have to employ large numbers of staff to deal with all aspects of administration regarding accounts that become overdrawn without prior authorisation. furthermore, we have had to devolop and maintain the technology to allow us to carry out these within, in case of returned items, precise timescales laid down by the clearing process.

 

Notwithstanding the above, when you become a customer, we give you details of anycharges for the day to day running of your account. details of our charges are also available from our branch staff, telephone helpline or our website. while banking with us can be completely free, we apply charges if a customer does not have enough money in their account to meet payments they have requested us to make.

 

You incurred charges because you did not ensure funds were available in you account to cover the payments set up by you. it is your responsibility to operate your account within any agreed limits.

 

as a business we are entitled to set charges to cover additonal work. these charges are not hidden and are notified in the guide to banking charges leaflet we produce. we advise our customers to ensure cleared funds are available in their accounts to meet payments due. you will also note that in the front of each cheque book we request that funds are abailable before cheques are issued.

 

you acepted these terms when you opened you account and when you agreed your overdraft. we did not agree to pay your account in excess of the amount agreed without charges being made.

 

accordingly, i am unable to agree with your request to refund the charges. we do expect your account to be run in line with the terms and conditions of its operation. this means that you must ensure that cleared funds are deposited into the account the working day before any payments are due. if you do not feel you will be able to run your account in accordance with terms and conditions, we may have to consider withdrawing certain facilities, such as any debit cards, overdrafts and cheque books. alternativly, you may wish to consider seeking other banking arrangements elsewhere.

 

That was from Martin Orton at Birmingham

 

do you think its worth me putting a money claim in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That really does sound like a response from a no-star contact centre operative - would the bank chairman really delegate his letter writing to such a non-entity?

to make a contribution towards our costs in maintining their account

Surely, by definition a 'contribution' is voluntary...

 

I'm not even going to go further in that letter - if it was to me I would be in the bank within 60 minutes, asking for a complete explanation of it's meaning, from a person that could be held to account for the explanation...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...