Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Toyota Finance - Car loan question. Very concerned!


Surfer01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In 2008 we purchased a used Toyota car from a Toyota dealer and used Toyota finance to finance the vehicle. The repayments are £193 per month. At the time I thought I was signing a HP agreement but it turns out it was a loan agreement.

In October last year I was made redundant and arranged a DMP through CAB and Toyota was being paid £135 per month. At no point did Toyota finance respond in writing accepting or rejecting the DMP. As a matter of fact they never responded to any letters.

At the end of June I managed to find temporary work and at the end of July started paying them in full again however in September I fell ill with flu and was off work for 7 working days and obviously do not get paid when I am off.

As a result I was unable to meet my commitment on the 30/09/09 however paid the instalment £193 in full today after a lot of aggro with them.

Basically they are saying that because I have arrears from when I was on the DMP I need to pay the arrears of £382 which is less than 2 month's payments off over the next three months or hand back the car. There is no ways I can afford to pay an additional £130 per month to catch up.

The person taking my payment was a real nasty piece of work and gave me a real hard time even though I stated that all I wanted to do was pay the outstanding monthly payment and that if they had issues they shoudl write to me.

As far as I am aware the the loan is not tied to the car but then I was never given a copy of the Terms & Conditions from day one even though I asked for it on several different occasions verbally and in writing. The agreement that I signed does not state this but it may be in the T & Cs that I do not have at present.

In the event that the loan is tied to the car what are my options? I am aware that they will need a court order to take back the car and I would like to avoid any court charges. However how would a judge look at it if I am making an attempt to pay the monthly instalment even though I have arrears?

If not, I assume that I can sell the car, pay a sum off the car and then pay reduced paymenst until it is all cleared.

Which ever way we go, after selling the car, there will still be a balance outstanding of £2000 which if spread over the remainder of the term will reduce the payment per month to about £70 which is affordable.

Some input would really be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well it really does depend on the agreement and what you isgned up to; get a copy fast. did you sign it at the dealers and if so why werent you given a copy? if it is a loan ( personal, then it is not tied to the car ). and I am sure you may have got abetter deal somewhere else. As they say they can take the car back then it does sound like HP. its not lease purchase is it. the type of loan/purcahse is really importatnt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Something aint right here. Firstly the dealer should of provided you with a copy of the agreement you signed and should of made clear what type of finance you were getting. And Toyota Finance would'nt give you attitude over the phone especially over such a small amount of arrears and I could'nt see them offering a loan to finance a car, they would normally do it via an HP agreement. Are you 100% sure it IS Toyota Finance? You should of got a proper finance agreement from them within a short time after buying the car.

 

Now the good news; you say you have allready written to them requesting the agreement, when did you send the first letter? Was it over 2 weeks ago? If so, your account is now 'in dispute' and as such is un-inforceable. Also, if the car was bought with a loan rather than HP then they can't re-posses it any way.

 

Others will dive in hopefully and offer you more advice on this so you may wish to post the paperwork up for us to look at but please delete any personal details including account numbers ect before you do.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well If Its A Fixed Sum Loan Agreement, The Car Is Your, You Can Sell It, Whatever

 

The Finance Co Has No Claim On It

 

Need To See How The Agreement Is Headed

 

Fixed Sum Loan Agreement

Hp Agreement

Conditional Sale

Get The Idea

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the above. I have double checked and it is definitely a loan from Toyota finance otherwise I would have been able to hand the car back to them. There is nothing on the agreement about once you have paid "x" amount you can hand back the car however it does say that after 24 months settlement figure is "y", or after 36 months "X" etc.

When I signed the original agreement I assumed it was a HP agreement as I did not think that Toyota did loans. Obviously at the time I was not that familar with all the ins and outs of agreements.

The atttitude of their representative when I was trying to make the monthly payment which was less than 48 hours after the payment date just beggars belief as it was him threatening that they would take the car back. I had a run in with this same character just after I got made redundant and wrote a letter complaining about his attitude but they never responded to my letter or any other letters we sent them.

Although I was bit concerned I had the savvy to realise that a court order would be required to do this but even with a court order they may not be able to take back the car as the court order IMHO would be a demand to pay the outstanding balance and not handing back the car.

If I was trying to avoid paying the debt then maybe I could understand it. It is nice to come on here and get re-assurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a cca request no1 in my sig

 

inlcude a po for £1 and send recorded

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a cca request no1 in my sig

 

inlcude a po for £1 and send recorded

 

ida x

 

Don't sign the letter in your normal signature either! Initials or digi sign! They cannot repossess your car on this type of loan without a court order. It is not Hire Purchase! I have a very similar situation going too!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/161277-aa99-ge-money-car.html

 

:) ps. as soon as your valid CCA has not been received, the account is officially in dispute and the buck stops there!

Edited by AA99
ps.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Variation of a secured loan! the loan is secured on the car. so if you default they can apply to the court to take it back. not good, however I think if it came to court and you could prove hardship a judge wpuld enforce acceptance of a reduced payment per month on lender, especially if there is only a small amount outstanding. You would only get one shot at this, default again and they will get the order to take the car. the other option is to sell it and repay the loan, but any check will reveal that there is a charge against it that needs to be settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The arrears amount outstanding is only just less than 2 months payments and that was because I was in a DMP at the time however having said that at present I am off work due to my disability and only on SSP and I may not be able to return to work. I have also contacted CCCCs to help with our finances.

The amount outstanding on the loan is approximately £6600 and if we sell the car, we would be lucky to see £5000. The idea was to sell the car, pay in whatever we managed to sell it for and then pay reduced affordable payments. Although we bought the car over 2 years ago, we only received a copy of the T & Cs yesterday.

Perhaps we should draft a letter to Toyota Finance advising that we wish to sell the vehicle in order to pay off the bulk of the loan and then to pay reduced payments due to financial problems. Also adding in the letetr that if they fail to respond, we will assume that they agree to our proposal. At least that way it may generate a reposnse from them.

As I have already defaulted when I was on the DMP by paying a lower amount they may now take me to court, however I would like to have my say in court and make the proposal of selling the car to pay off the bulk of the loan. I am not sure if a judge would allow this or whether the judge would prefer reduced payments. We have never missed making a payment and when on the DMP we were paying about £60 less than our normal payment.

I am fairly certain that Toyota are going to pursue this as I lost my rag with the obnoxious character on the other end of the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certailnly write to them and outline a reduced payment and sale plan. This always looks good in court as you are trying to address the problem and if toyota play hard ball it will go aganst them, if your offer is reasonable. Also enclose a breakdown of income and expendityre so you can demonatrate what little if any disposable income you have. good luck and dont worry it will be a fairly long drawn out process. And point out that any additional caherges should not added to the account, as I undersatnd they will be excluded when it comes to court.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

a couple of things,

 

the t and c's are not drectly linked? it says page 2 of 3 customers copy but on the agreement it says page 1 of 2????

 

i can't see where it says what type of agreement it is?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does not say what type of agrement it is which is why when signing I thought I was signing a HP agreement. I did not realised that it was a secured loan as nowhere on the front copy that you sign is this stated. A bit misleading I guess. I am not 100% convinced that those T & Cs were in place when I signed or whether they were introduced at a later date.

I wonder if it is possible to view the original documents on a personal visit if you requested it as the T & Cs should be on the rear of the document. Perhaps this is why it has taken me 2 years to get the T & Cs out of them as they were never there in the first place. I wonder if the dealer would have the original copy as they were a main Toyota dealer? I suppose if it ever went to court, I could ask them to produce the original signed document for me to view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Variation of a secured loan! the loan is secured on the car.

 

I'm not so sure. At no point does it say the agreement is secured.

 

It looks ALOT like my OH's BH agreement, it seems to be an unsecured Personal Loan, restricted use (the car) Debtor-Creditor-Supplier.

 

 

@OP - If you do a HPI check, what does it say about your car?

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure. At no point does it say the agreement is secured.

 

It looks ALOT like my OH's BH agreement, it seems to be an unsecured Personal Loan, restricted use (the car) Debtor-Creditor-Supplier.

 

 

@OP - If you do a HPI check, what does it say about your car?

 

H

 

Agree;) I couldn't see anywhere it stated what sort of a loan it was and can we see the missing pages too!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does say in the T & C no.5 about selling the car with the cash loan!? but nothing about taking it back if you default, so maybe just a personal loan then;odd!

 

My OH's Suzuki/Blackhorse loan has the same term.

 

There has been some muttering on one of my threads that it **Might**/**Could** be classed as an Unfair term.

 

 

In my own opinion, these types of agreements (The personal loan type) are the Finance Co's attempt to get out of the obligations they have for a HP agreement (Voluntary Termination, etc.) but still try to keep all of the good bits (such as recording they have an interest in the car, retrieving the vehicle in Default, etc.),possibly by miss-information.

 

From what the OP has said, they have told him that they can get the car back (one of the Benefits a Creditor gets in a HP, but not in an unsecured Loan) and they did a similar thing to my OH. Infact, in my OH's case, they made an entry on the account's log that as the car had been retrieved and sold by them, they had no further Legal Recourse!

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does all sound a bit devious this loan. It says Cash Loan so presumably it was for cash from which a car was purcahesd. I wonder what the court would think if they applied for repossession? I would do an HPI check to see if any interest has been logged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCCs are a charity. Seems I put in too may Cs. See CCCS - Free Debt Advice from the UK's Leading Debt Charity I agree that it seems suspect that secured loan is not mentioned on the agreement itself but is hidden in the small print. The missimg pages have never been supplied. Top copy to dealer / finance company, 2 page customer copy, 3rd page T & cs but the way it si done does not tally!

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCCs are a charity. Seems I put in too may Cs. See CCCS - Free Debt Advice from the UK's Leading Debt Charity I agree that it seems suspect that secured loan is not mentioned on the agreement itself but is hidden in the small print. The missimg pages have never been supplied. Top copy to dealer / finance company, 2 page customer copy, 3rd page T & cs but the way it si done does not tally!

 

It's not though - it is an unsecured loan. They are just trying to put (potentialluy unfair) conditions on what you can do with YOUR goods.

 

H

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...