Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sacked Gross Misconduct


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone who has been sacked for Gross Misconduct had problems finding new employment? Were you honest on the application form?

 

Are you employed now? How long did it take you to find employment? Sorry for the questions.

 

My brother-in-law was dismissed for standing up to the bully supervisor in March this year. The assistant manager used to pick on people he did not like and favoured those he did. My b-i-law stood up for one of the ones that was being constantly being picked on (17yr old). Then the bully turned on him and made his life hell.

 

B-i-law was supervisor. Had trouble finding employment.

 

Hi there.

 

Is your brother in law finding it difficult gaining employment because of the reference he will receive from his previous employer? When you say 'were you honest in your application forum' do you mean the reason for leaving or are you referring to CRB/Disclosure checks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, meant to say, if it is because he is not getting a satisfactory reference from his ex employer, then maybe a way round it would be to take a short-term, less paid job......basically just anything he can get his hands on to then be able to put that down as a present/previous employer and therefore cut out the one he was dismissed from.

 

I know jobs aren't easy to come by, but it's just a option that he could consider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dismissed is not a good word to use, but then again, being dishonest is not great neither. Bit of a catch 22 situation.

 

One way I can compare is people with criminal convictions come across the same type of problems but are still successfull in gaining employment - here is a link to a site - www.unlock.org.uk

 

Unlock is a charity which helps ex offenders. I know your brother in law is not in the same situation, but he will be coming across the same kind of discrimination i.e. gaps in CV's, whether he should be honest in an application form, honest at an interview etc.

 

Go onto Unlock and read through some of the posts....hopefully it will provide you with some help in deciding how best to approach his dillema.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs!

 

Let me know how you if it was of any help to you! :)

 

ps....if anything, this forum will hopefully provide you with the hope that gaining employment is definately possible. Some of the people on Unlock have mountains to climb before they can secure employment, but they do!

 

Your brother in law just needs to get rid of his last employer as a reference - what about voluntary work or a short term college course whereby he could put his lecturer/tutor as a reference? The more he can put his previous employer in the past, the better!

Edited by Button1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The p.t course is a good idea but costly and so is the v.work. He is on jobs seekers, would the p.t course effect this?

 

I don't mean to put a downer on everything but would they not need at least 5 years checkable work history?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The p.t course is a good idea but costly and so is the v.work. He is on jobs seekers, would the p.t course effect this?

 

I don't mean to put a downer on everything but would they not need at least 5 years checkable work history?

 

Yes, I think you would need to put down your employment history, but I believe most employers only request 2 references, one from your last employer, and another from another reputable person ie professional person who knows you and can provide a good character reference for you. Its sometimes a good idea to take a character reference along to an interview with you to present to the company.

 

Could your brother in law get help from Job Seekers with regards to training or courses etc? He just needs to get another employer as his most recent and not go into too much detail about the job he lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was sacked for gross misconduct from my job on the railway over a year ago and,although I do some part-time work,still cannot find full-time employment in a similar position.If I do manage to get a reply for a vacancy then one of the first questions asked is why you left your last job,you can't lie so your automatically at a disavantage.I am still waiting for a tribunal(been told that it will most probably be in December)and unless I am successful there cannot see myself working in a safety critical job ever again.25 years work experience down the drain just because I dared to question a manager on the job for 6 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya,

i was sacked in early august09 for gross misconduct.i have been lucky in a way that i had a evening job at the time with the local NHS.at the moment i am getting overtime in the day but my contracted hours are in the evening.

i did fill out a application form and put down dismissed and the lady rung me up and said what i did etc and two weeks later offered me a interview but that job didnt have enough hours etc.

me personally i am going to put down dismissed and if i get a interview and if there ask why i got dismissed then i will tell them.be honest thats what i say because if you dont and get the job and they find out then that is gross misconduct aswell.

cheers stevo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was sacked for gross misconduct from my job on the railway over a year ago and,although I do some part-time work,still cannot find full-time employment in a similar position.If I do manage to get a reply for a vacancy then one of the first questions asked is why you left your last job,you can't lie so your automatically at a disavantage.I am still waiting for a tribunal(been told that it will most probably be in December)and unless I am successful there cannot see myself working in a safety critical job ever again.25 years work experience down the drain just because I dared to question a manager on the job for 6 months.

So you were dismissed in the same way as b-i Law. :( And 25 years of experience. Sorry to hear that the manager took all that away from you. I hope the tribunal goes in your favour.

 

It makes it tens times worse to find employment when they say it's gross misconduct. These 'managers don't realise or care how they ruin people's lives. Especially for the ones that have done nothing wrong compared to the ones that do (theft, drugs etc).

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya,

i was sacked in early august09 for gross misconduct.i have been lucky in a way that i had a evening job at the time with the local NHS.at the moment i am getting overtime in the day but my contracted hours are in the evening.

i did fill out a application form and put down dismissed and the lady rung me up and said what i did etc and two weeks later offered me a interview but that job didnt have enough hours etc.

me personally i am going to put down dismissed and if i get a interview and if there ask why i got dismissed then i will tell them.be honest thats what i say because if you dont and get the job and they find out then that is gross misconduct aswell.

cheers stevo.

Wow she offered you an interview even after? That hasn't happened once for b-i-Law. Could be because you already work p.t.

 

I see what you mean about being upfront or you could lose the job later. But dismissed for gross misconduct doesn't get b-i-Law through the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it could be because i have a part time job but also another reason was that my friend who works there told them the truth and the lady listened.blimey i was in the food trade for 22 years and yes i have been employed by the NHS for the 3 and a bit years.

Gross misconduct covers a wide range of stuff nowadays,everybody is getting sacked for it.

stevo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

I was sacked in early Sept 09. As I worked (nearly 2yrs) within a nursing home.

 

I have gone through the disciplinary hearing and was sacked the same day....later in the day, over the telephone. As they could not come to a decision.

 

I am now at the APPEALs stage.

 

My concern is that the overall outcome my CRB check will be effected by it. I have never in my life, been through such a demeaning and miserable and stressful time.

 

Is there anyway of 'appealing' against the decision that goes on a CRB check.

 

I was falsely accused of swearing at a client in a room with another worker (who put the complaint in!) The event is complete fabrication on her part. Remove the 'story' she has made up and there is nothing to go on. But work have classed it as 'emotional abuse' which then is interpretated as 'at risk of harm' and anyone sacked by these means is to be reported to the secretary of state. An official government body.

 

Losing my job is hard enough but to punish me for something I haven't done and a further 10yrs of my life is over the top!

 

 

I am sick to the pit of my stomach with it all. I am under the doctor for tablets to keep me 'calm' as suffering with anxiety from it all.

 

Any help/feedback is most welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask your employers for a copy of their disciplinary procedures.I know that there are certain rules that have to be followed.

Were you suspended while the allegations were investigated?

Were you notified of the allegations and given time to seek advice?

You have three months from the date you were dismissed to put in a claim to the Employment Tribunal but you may have to wait months(over a year in my case)for it to be heard.

Best bet is your appeal hearing,make sure you go in well prepared.Good luck.

Edited by greendollar
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for reply Green Dollar. Yes followed everything by the book....but my appeal is just round the corner so to speak. If this fails is getting a solicitor who will take it on. Even beforehand, trying to find one was a nightmare as 'unemployed' can't get legal aid for area of Employment problems. So catch 22!

 

would like to know the 'time limit' if any that it takes from reporting someone to the info. being on CRB check. Like is it done within a week a month or takes ages for it to happen? That is other worry! (Could be at a press of a button and procedure over!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi im hennessey's b.in law. Only two people are in employment after being sacked for gross misconduct and only because they were already working in those jobs? I wish i had done that or had just left when i was suspended. At least i would not have had this dark cloud following me.

 

This is upsetting. Are there no success stories from people who were sacked and now have found employment again? :(

 

Don't want to be claiming jsa. Want to be working. :(

 

James

Try changing your career path by doing a course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

could somebody please help,my wife was dismissed from b and q on the 7th august the reason given was gross misconduct, in that i have reasonable grounds to believe that you did a serious breach of the companies operating and security procedures whereby on the 23/07/09 you failed to challenge a customer leaving the store without making payment for his goods.

 

she was on the self service tills at the time , and did not notice he had not paid for 1 item until he left the store,she did contact the security guard. what my problem is her handbook says in all cases shoplifting you should contact a member of management immediatly, to deal with the matter. We do not expect you, at anytime, to expose yourself to any unreasonable risk to personl safety.

 

She has recentley found new employment, and i am a little concerened as to what her reference from b and q will say, when she had her appeal she asked the H R Manager about the references and she said that they will say she was dismissed I rang head office and asked them and they told ME it would say dissmissed but wouldnt say why.she had her interveiw on the 29/9/09, got job offer on 7/10/09, her new employer has asked for a personal reference which she has got, but im not sure if she has the one from b and q , my wife rang b and q yesterday and they said that they have not received anything, im worried please help. She is currently waiting fror acas to contact her regarding her unfair dissmisssal

Edited by SteveMetal
Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt very much that her new employer will contact B&Q for a reference,was she asked at her interview why she had left B&Q and if so what did she say?

Remember you have 3 months from the date of her dismissal to apply to the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...