Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Msa V Halifax ***SETTLED IN FULL***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6331 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

Sent off Halifax S.A.R 19.07.06, recieved letter saying statements would follow but havent got them yet. I have had a look through the forums to see if there is a template letter to remind them of the time scale limitation, cant find one, i know its still early days just wondered if anyone has had this problem and what did you do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Statements have finally arrived, i added up the charges which came to over £700 (for 1 account) over the weekend, typed out my prelim letter and list of charges and sent them off this morning recorded delivery. Will see if they are any quicker at replying to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got a letter friday offering a settelment figure and brochure with information on banking charges. i am really happy that i am starting to see some progress and the halifax is paying me for a change! tempted to accept but i think ill take them to the cleaners. Just about to look through the forums on what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats really good to hear Tarisa, did you claim the full amount?

 

Also am a little confused so if anyone could clear this up for me i would be grateful. i received the standard settlement offer of just over half the ammount 2 days before the 14 day deadline was up and i read under step by step instructions that there is no need to send another letter, just start the moneyclaim, am i correct in thinking that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

only just received the first offer, so still have half the battle left to fight! no there is another letter to send accepting the offer only in part payment and you will be claiming for the rest, you will find it in the library templates! good luck!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

But I would limit their response time to 7 days, no more.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks jonni2bad,

 

Halifax letter came today, just another standard reply letter i think, saying "we will not be refunding the money as you did not wish to accept it", thats funny i am sure i said i would but still persue for the full amount!

Anyway i have registered with money claim so i guess i will double check i know what i am doing and get on with that.

 

Time from starting this whole process upto now 2 months 10 days, but i am making progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post back if you need help with the Particulars

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just to confirm and inform any confused souls

 

On MCOL "money claim online" you register, enter your details, as the person claiming you are the claimant and then enter the banks details they are the defendent.

 

Keep following the instructions step by step, as i understand you enter no under the human rights act question, and yes under the reserve the right to claim interest (if you have decided to claim your interest).

 

I then entered this as my short statement:

 

I am claiming back charges in the amount of

£xxxxx deducted from my account because i

now understand that they are unlawful at

common law. I will also be claiming back the

costs i have incurred during this process

which include the £10.00 cost for the subject access request and court fee of £80.00.

And added the total costs in the calculation boxes provided below.

I couldnt find any info on CAG site about filling in MCOL but i suppose it pretty simple to understand and fill in, this is just incase your wondering plus could a moderator or someone in the know please confirm i have done it correctly. THANKS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I then entered this as my short statement:

 

I am claiming back charges in the amount of

£xxxxx deducted from my account because i

now understand that they are unlawful at

common law. I will also be claiming back the

costs i have incurred during this process

which include the £10.00 cost for the subject access request and court fee of £80.00.

 

This is a little sparse as Particulars of Claims go. You could try this which may need a little tweaking to fit

:

Claimant has account (A/C No) with Defendant from (Date a/c opened) conducted on their standard terms and conditions. Claimant is claiming the return of (£0.00 = amount of charges claimed) taken by Defendant in charges over (X) years. The Defendant’s charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. They are also invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2.1.e.

In the event that the charges are not a penalty they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. Defendant has declined justification of charges despite repeated requests. Claimant claims interest under Sec.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from(Date of 1st charge) to (Date of filing claim) of (£0.00 =The interest in the 8% spreadsheet calculation) and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00p = Amount of charges claimed x 0.00022).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i might of messed up or am just being paranoid, sent LBA off dated 24.09.06. Recevied halifax reply saying "i confirm we will not refund all the charges" on 30.09.06. I then assumed because they have clearly stated they will not be refunding me i could start my MCOL so i did and entered it yesterday, 7 days before the 14 day deadline.

All the other threads seem to be waiting the full 14 day deadline before entering it, will that cause any problems? thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you enter here?

 

Do you wish to enter Judgment by Default or by Admission? Please select one of the options below:

spacer.gif The defendant has not filed an admission or defence to my claim

(Judgment by Default)

spacer.gif

You will need to decide, how and when you want the defendant to pay. You can ask for the Judgment to be paid by instalment or in one payment.

spacer.gif The defendant admits that all the money is owed

(Judgment by Admission)

spacer.gif

If the defendant has given a new address on the form of admission to which correspondence should be sent, update the defendant's details within the following Judgment request.

 

 

Sorry for been thick, help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in over my head!!!

 

I thought i had really done well up to this point, i was uisng the CAG site to do research and double check everything without having to ask questions every 2 seconds but now am at a loss.

 

Questions:

Once the claim has been issued on MCOL am i right in thinking that you send off the schedule of charges to Northampton County Court straight away?

 

Do i click on start under judgement in the claim menu on MCOL website, or is somthing suppose to happen first like the bank replies or you give them the fourteen days?

 

If you do click on start straight away, what is the answer to the above post?(because it is the first option you get)

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't send any copies, really don't think you need to at this point. Your MCOL claim is complete - where it now says 'issued' will change at some point over the next 19 days (the court will write to you shortly informing you of their deadline to respond). It will probably change to 'acknowledged' within this time. You need only use the default function (where is says 'start') if the Halifax miss thier deadline so don't worry about what you have asked in post #23. You really won't have to do much over the next few weeks, so sit back, give yourself a pat on the back, and don't fret!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...